LISTSERV 15.5 - RECMGMT-L Archives

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

RECMGMT-L Archives

May 2008, Week 2

Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Search Archives

Subject	From	Date	Size
ADMIN PLS read here we go again was Re: [RM] Centralized Scanning Office	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 14:00:17 -0400	75 lines
Re: ADMIN PLS read here we go again was Re: [RM] Centralized Scanning Office	Ryan, Rebecca <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 11:20:32 -0700	132 lines
Re: ADMIN PLS read here we go again was Re: [RM] Centralized Scanning Office	Jessie D. Miller <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 13:34:59 -0500	66 lines
Re: ADMIN PLS read here we go again was Re: [RM] Centralized Scanning Office	Vanessa Hodge <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 11:41:07 -0700	95 lines
Re: ADMIN PLS read here we go again was Re: [RM] Centralized Scanning Office	Christopher Varlack <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 14:50:41 -0400	35 lines
Re: ADMIN PLS read here we go again was Re: [RM] Centralized Scanning Office	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 13:16:56 -0700	34 lines
Re: ADMIN PLS read here we go again was Re: [RM] Centralized Scanning Office	Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 15:02:22 -0600	92 lines
Am I being to picky w/this [potential] vendor?	Earl Johnson, Jr. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 13:41:21 -0700	48 lines
Re: Am I being to picky w/this [potential] vendor?	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 13:55:15 -0700	33 lines
Re: Am I being to picky w/this [potential] vendor?	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 15:59:54 -0500	31 lines
Re: Am I being to picky w/this [potential] vendor?	Deborah Gouin <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 17:00:06 -0400	87 lines
Re: Am I being to picky w/this [potential] vendor?	Joan Brunning-Symons <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 16:01:08 -0500	24 lines
Re: Am I being to picky w/this [potential] vendor?	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 14:10:47 -0700	35 lines
Re: Am I being to picky w/this [potential] vendor?	Stephanie Jones <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 16:27:49 -0500	40 lines
Re: Am I being to picky w/this [potential] vendor?	Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 07:51:10 +1000	52 lines
Re: Am I being to picky w/this [potential] vendor?	J. Michael Pemberton <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 20:04:04 -0400	57 lines
Re: Am I being to picky w/this [potential] vendor?	Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 09:57:28 -0400	39 lines
Re: Am I being to picky w/this [potential] vendor?	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 09:33:37 -0500	32 lines
Re: Am I being too picky...	Earl Johnson, Jr. <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 12:22:37 -0700	30 lines
ARMA Austin May Chapter Meeting (Tuesday May 13th)	Montoya, Andres <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 10:29:55 -0500	31 lines
ARMA RIM Self-assessment	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 15:00:54 -0400	24 lines
Re: ARMA RIM Self-assessment	Stakhov, Gene <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 16:54:26 -0400	30 lines
Re: ARMA RIM Self-assessment	Tom Wilson <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 16:02:35 -0500	53 lines
Re: ARMA RIM Self-assessment	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 17:10:02 -0400	30 lines
Re: ARMA RIM Self-assessment	Steve Petersen <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 16:42:37 -0500	27 lines
Re: ARMA RIM Self-assessment	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 14:45:38 -0700	121 lines
Re: ARMA RIM Self-assessment	Frederick Walden/YM/RWDOE <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 15:17:48 -0700	82 lines
Re: ARMA RIM Self-assessment	Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 15:23:23 -0700	26 lines
Re: ARMA RIM Self-assessment	Nolene Sherman <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 15:44:57 -0700	28 lines
Boy Friday afternoon sure was some fun!	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 11 May 2008 20:04:37 -0400	138 lines
Re: Boy Friday afternoon sure was some fun!	Nick De Laurentis <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 00:50:51 -0400	21 lines
Canon Business Services	Chris Browne <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 11:52:25 -0600	39 lines
Centralized Scanning Office	Nishika Gupta <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 11:24:15 -0400	31 lines
Re: Centralized Scanning Office	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 10:28:49 -0500	59 lines
Re: Centralized Scanning Office	Frisbie, Linda K <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 12:41:38 -0400	44 lines
Re: Centralized Scanning Office	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 12:01:31 -0500	36 lines
Re: Centralized Scanning Office	Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 10:12:20 -0700	63 lines
Re: Centralized Scanning Office	A.S.E. Fairfax <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 10:29:32 -0700	33 lines
Re: Centralized Scanning Office	Bradley, Mary <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 13:40:28 -0400	77 lines
Re: Centralized Scanning Office	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 13:44:38 -0400	33 lines
Re: Centralized Scanning Office	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 12:57:04 -0500	65 lines
Re: Centralized Scanning Office	Nishika Gupta <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 09:40:28 -0400	116 lines
Re: Centralized Scanning Office	Evans Kitty <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 10:00:08 -0400	170 lines
Re: Centralized Scanning Office	Vednere, Ganesh <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 10:39:50 -0400	40 lines
Re: Centralized Scanning Office	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 08:48:12 -0500	135 lines
Centralized Scanning Response	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 11:51:41 -0500	105 lines
consultant	Trudy M Phillips <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 19:58:52 EDT	32 lines
Consultant information request	Michael DeVanna <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 11:30:38 -0700	20 lines
Re: Consultant information request	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 14:59:19 -0400	52 lines
Re: Consultant information request	Trudy M Phillips <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 19:56:47 EDT	53 lines
Correction: Job Posting US-TX-Houston Records Management Specialist - Taxonomist	Weber, Sandra (JSC-IS)[TES] <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 16:40:49 -0500	111 lines
Diana Holbein is out of the office on 5/13/08	Diana Holbein <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 22:09:16 -0400	18 lines
Re: Does anyone print labels directly from MS Access?	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 06:42:46 -0400	33 lines
Re: Does anyone print labels directly from MS Access?	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 07:08:56 -0400	34 lines
Re: Does anyone print labels directly from MS Access?	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 07:26:44 -0400	48 lines
Re: Does anyone print labels directly from MS Access?	Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 07:42:10 -0400	44 lines
Re: Does anyone print labels directly from MS Access?	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 08:03:40 -0400	34 lines
Re: Does anyone print labels directly from MS Access?	Gerry McFatridge <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 08:14:19 -0400	48 lines
Re: Does anyone print labels directly from MS Access?	Osier, Nina <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 08:17:49 -0400	28 lines
Re: Does anyone print labels directly from MS Access?	Gary Vocks <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 07:46:30 -0500	57 lines
Re: Does anyone print labels directly from MS Access?	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 08:49:34 -0400	94 lines
E-Discovery Compliance Starts with Records Management Plan	pakurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 17:20:11 -0700	31 lines
Re: E-Discovery Compliance Starts with Records Management Plan	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 21:16:33 -0400	31 lines
ECM Solution - EDMS Product Option	Steve Shalagan <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 10:16:47 -0500	38 lines
Re: ECM Solution - EDMS Product Option	charlie sodano <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 08:23:14 -0700	68 lines
Re: ECM Solution - EDMS Product Option	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 09:38:19 -0600	25 lines
Enterprise 2.0	Aaron Taylor <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 09:26:24 -0500	33 lines
f RM were a TV Show?	McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 21:05:08 -0500	54 lines
FW: [RM] Centralized Scanning Office	Ryan, Rebecca <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 11:22:48 -0700	89 lines
FW: [RM] Does anyone print labels directly from MS Access?	Chris Everett <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 11:15:43 -0400	45 lines
Re: FW: [RM] Does anyone print labels directly from MS Access?	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 18:16:42 -0400	46 lines
Green Archives anyone?	Debra Kimok <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 15:46:38 -0400	81 lines
Happy Mothers day	Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 11 May 2008 11:24:25 -0600	21 lines
History of forms	JIm Cassedy <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 10:21:49 -0400	22 lines
Re: History of forms	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 07:44:55 -0700	28 lines
Re: History of forms	Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 11:41:16 -0600	46 lines
Re: History of forms	Graham Kitchen <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 15:38:08 -0500	47 lines
If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Earl Johnson, Jr. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 13:20:18 -0700	27 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Cynthia Hobson <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 10:30:22 -1000	52 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Alice Young <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 16:31:06 -0400	45 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Williams, Stephanie <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 15:37:19 -0500	58 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Cahill, Colin E. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 16:37:22 -0400	54 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Matthew Hebert <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 13:39:04 -0700	61 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 13:41:01 -0700	23 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Myree-Rofe, Simone <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 13:33:58 -0700	61 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Lura Harrison <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 13:42:39 -0700	76 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Cynthia Hobson <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 10:45:39 -1000	49 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Pilar McAdam <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 13:46:15 -0700	39 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Millican & Associates, Inc. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 16:50:06 -0400	61 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Jon Quandt <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 16:51:15 -0400	61 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Jessie D. Miller <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 15:51:03 -0500	49 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Cahill, Colin E. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 16:57:33 -0400	95 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 14:04:08 -0700	33 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Shirley Patschke <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 15:57:23 -0500	45 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Bradley, Mary <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 17:09:26 -0400	69 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Frederick Walden/YM/RWDOE <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 14:10:26 -0700	57 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Seibolt, Robert <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 16:10:05 -0500	29 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 17:14:02 -0400	38 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 17:26:25 -0400	29 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Stephen Cohen <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 17:27:56 -0400	29 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Stephen Cohen <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 17:35:56 -0400	44 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 18:11:31 -0400	57 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	keith.harris <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 18:15:19 -0500	77 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Geoff Bethell <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 11:42:33 +1200	141 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Shelley Arnold <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 08:09:48 +0800	203 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 17:39:49 -0700	24 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 22:44:25 -0400	66 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Steve Petersen <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 08:05:37 -0500	17 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Evans Kitty <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 10:38:56 -0400	40 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Francisci, Hugh (MGCS) <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 10:48:50 -0400	57 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Milton Donald <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 11:00:02 -0400	114 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Tom Wilson <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 10:24:47 -0500	41 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 08:12:44 -0700	27 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Laird, Elizabeth (ITC) <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 13:58:48 -0500	50 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	McLallen, David <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 08:43:44 -0600	47 lines
Re: If RM were a song, what would the title be?	McLallen, David <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 08:46:39 -0600	32 lines
Important email cases redux	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 10 May 2008 07:42:56 -0600	56 lines
Re: Important email cases redux	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 10 May 2008 10:50:18 -0400	53 lines
Re: Important email cases redux	Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 10 May 2008 13:30:02 -0600	23 lines
Re: Important email cases redux	Shelton, Alicia <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 10:28:53 -0500	42 lines
Important email cases?	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 17:39:10 -0600	42 lines
International Retention	Levita High <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 17:53:00 -0400	18 lines
Re: International Retention	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 17:07:05 -0500	34 lines
Job Posting Consultant - Records/Matter Management - Legal	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 22:19:07 -0400	44 lines
Job Posting US-TX-Houston Records Management Specialist - Taxonomist	Weber, Sandra (JSC-IS)[TES] <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 15:51:35 -0500	96 lines
Job Posting US-TX-Houston Records Management Specialist - Taxonomist	Weber, Sandra (JSC-IS)[TES] <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 15:58:23 -0500	96 lines
Re: Lessons Learned for Training and Records Management ; ECM	Melissa Guenther <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 06:50:25 -0700	97 lines
Litigation hold	Joan Brunning-Symons <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 10:32:25 -0500	50 lines
Re: Litigation hold	Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 08:46:52 -0700	29 lines
Re: Litigation hold	Hawkins, Lisa A (2HX) <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 17:28:23 -0400	57 lines
Managing YOUR List subscription	Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 14:09:45 -0700	32 lines
Re: Managing YOUR List subscription	Tom Wilson <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 19:34:14 -0500	61 lines
Re: Managing YOUR List subscription	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 23:48:38 -0500	37 lines
Re: Managing YOUR List subscription	Creamer, William <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 09:26:35 -0400	42 lines
Re: Managing YOUR List subscription	debbie ferguson <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 14:15:23 +0000	65 lines
Marketing RIM	John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 14:59:38 -0400	38 lines
Re: Marketing RIM	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 15:18:37 -0400	64 lines
Re: Marketing RIM	Jessie D. Miller <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 14:18:24 -0500	61 lines
Re: Marketing RIM	Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 15:30:17 -0400	54 lines
Re: Marketing RIM	Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 15:35:05 -0400	40 lines
Re: Marketing RIM	Barbara Wyton <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 15:47:50 -0400	32 lines
Re: Marketing RIM	Vana Lopez <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 13:08:32 -0700	22 lines
Re: Marketing RIM	Brian Devir <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 17:12:33 -0400	42 lines
Massachusetts. Cambridge Public Library.	Don Saklad <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 03:43:48 -0400	150 lines
Re: Massachusetts. Cambridge Public Library.	Don Saklad <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 03:53:32 -0400	13 lines
Re: Massachusetts. Cambridge Public Library.	Starck, Brian <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 07:17:14 -0600	172 lines
Re: Masters Degree Survey Assistance	Paul Dodgson <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 12:20:46 +0100	58 lines
MER Conference -- Only a Few Registration Opportunities Remain	Robert F. Williams <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 14:29:18 -0500	362 lines
Re: Merging Electronic Data Storage Software	Tim Shinkle <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 15:53:12 -0400	94 lines
Re: Merging Electronic Data Storage Software	Susan Brown <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 14:34:43 -0400	50 lines
Metadata Schemes or Common Taxonomies for Public Law Enforcement and Judicial Functions	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 15:36:36 -0700	68 lines
Re: Metadata Schemes or Common Taxonomies for Public Law Enforcement and Judicial Functions	Tanya Marshall <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 19:07:10 -0400	96 lines
Re: Metadata Schemes or Common Taxonomies for Public Law Enforcement and Judicial Functions	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 16:34:06 -0700	31 lines
Re: Metadata Schemes or Common Taxonomies for Public Law Enforcement and Judicial Functions	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 09:18:17 -0500	28 lines
Re: Metadata Schemes or Common Taxonomies for Public Law Enforcement and Judicial Functions	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 08:42:28 -0700	28 lines
Re: Metadata Schemes or Common Taxonomies for Public Law Enforcement and Judicial Functions	Don Prososki <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 11 May 2008 19:11:10 -0700	47 lines
Montague Institute: Summer calendar of events	Jean Graef <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 10:13:28 -0400	39 lines
NAGARA Grant Proposal Reminder	Marybelle Yeazel <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 09:43:31 -0400	43 lines
NARA- Great Lakes Region Trainining opportunities	Marybelle Yeazel <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 06:37:26 -0400	146 lines
NE Conference Approved Pre-Approved for 14 Maintenance Credits	LaSorsa, Frank <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 10:25:40 -0400	69 lines
OT OT UT R Wimps OT [RM] Why we don't all agree on this subject...	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 13:34:38 -0700	47 lines
Re: OT OT UT R Wimps OT [RM] Why we don't all agree on this subject...	Deanna Brouillette <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 15:43:52 -0500	44 lines
Re: Product Opinion Requested - Now vendor ads	Neil <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 07:10:23 -0700	41 lines
RAIN 20080 eMails, eMails, eMails, Internet Archive	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 11 May 2008 22:01:42 -0400	422 lines
RAIN 20080504 Bates numbered?, WH emails, UK forgeries, OHS, Stolen Secrets	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 22:29:09 -0400	375 lines
RAIN 20080506 SSN, WH emails, Spring Cleaning, Forgeries	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 10 May 2008 16:21:32 -0400	370 lines
RAIN 20080510 Missouri emails, Archivist funeral, eDiscovery, Dumpster finds,	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 23:02:00 -0400	362 lines
RAIN 20080512 IM buys, employee records, ID governor, Records purge, Dumpster find	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 22:07:33 -0400	242 lines
RAIN Article	Frederick Walden/YM/RWDOE <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 14 May 2008 06:54:56 -0700	28 lines
Recall: Job Posting US-TX-Houston Records Management Specialist - Taxonomist	Weber, Sandra (JSC-IS)[TES] <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 15:58:28 -0500	17 lines
Request for a Response From Vendors of Records Storage Boxes	Lorinda Kasten-Lowerre <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 09:32:20 -0700	34 lines
Re: Request for a Response From Vendors of Records Storage Boxes	williee foster <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 17:21:15 +0000	24 lines
Re: Request for a Response From Vendors of Records Storage Boxes	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 14:35:38 -0700	48 lines
resubscriber	Joan Brunning-Symons <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 09:46:10 -0500	31 lines
Retention Scheduling in Interwoven Records Manager	Cheryl L. Rose <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 16:32:09 -0400	47 lines
Re: Retention Scheduling in Interwoven Records Manager	Tracey Black <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 16:36:57 -0400	71 lines
Re: Retention Scheduling in Interwoven Records Manager	EATON DAVID <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 08:18:02 -0400	101 lines
Re: Retention Scheduling in Interwoven Records Manager	Patricia V. Romero <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 13 May 2008 08:32:22 -0400	29 lines
Re: RM Team Appreciation Suggestions???	Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 07:37:26 -0400	42 lines
Re: The end of ARMA as we know it	Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 10:24:37 -0400	131 lines
Re: The end of ARMA as we know it (????)	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 10:22:08 -0500	140 lines
what is max # boxes vendor can intake or perm out?	Maureen Cusack <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 17:46:34 -0700	37 lines
Re: what is max # boxes vendor can intake or perm out?	McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 20:16:04 -0500	42 lines
Re: what is max # boxes vendor can intake or perm out?	Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 19:04:41 -0700	32 lines
Re: what is max # boxes vendor can intake or perm out?	Bradley, Mary <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 09:44:05 -0400	119 lines
Re: what is max # boxes vendor can intake or perm out?	Pilar McAdam <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 08:24:22 -0700	92 lines
Re: what is max # boxes vendor can intake or perm out?	Anne Merwin <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 12 May 2008 18:33:47 -0500	48 lines
Why we don't all agree on this subject...	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 11:39:23 -0700	68 lines
Re: Why we don't all agree on this subject...	Deanna Brouillette <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 13:44:45 -0500	34 lines
Re: Why we don't all agree on this subject...	Lago, Starla <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 11:55:21 -0700	112 lines
Re: Why we don't all agree on this subject...	Jon Quandt <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 15:09:12 -0400	70 lines
Re: Why we don't all agree on this subject...	Creamer, William <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 15:18:21 -0400	32 lines
Re: Why we don't all agree on this subject...	[log in to unmask]	Fri, 9 May 2008 15:41:26 -0400	35 lines
Re: Why we don't all agree on this subject...	Sharon Blackstock <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 13:51:37 -0600	25 lines
Re: Why we don't all agree on this subject...	Joan Brunning-Symons <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 14:58:01 -0500	20 lines
Re: Why we don't all agree on this subject...	Christian Meinke <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 13:28:45 -0700	49 lines
Re: Why we don't all agree on this subject...	Gerry McFatridge <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 16:51:01 -0400	69 lines
Re: Why we don't all agree on this subject...	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 17:04:38 -0400	29 lines
Re: Why we don't all agree on this subject...	Tom Wilson <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 19:23:27 -0500	114 lines
Re: Why we don't all agree on this subject...	Tom Wilson <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 9 May 2008 19:24:51 -0500	33 lines
Re: [OT] [RM] If RM were a song, what would the title be?	Brent D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 8 May 2008 13:44:34 -0700	44 lines

Back to: Main RECMGMT-L Page

LISTS.UFL.EDU

RECMGMT-L Archives

May 2008, Week 2

Subject

From

Date

Size