LISTSERV 15.5 - RECMGMT-L Archives - February 2009, week 2

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

RECMGMT-L Archives

February 2009, Week 2

Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Search Archives

Subject	From	Date	Size
ADMIN GENTLE REMINDER WAS Re: [RM] ISO 15489	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:08:41 -0500	37 lines
ADMIN pls read was Re: [RM] Help...leaving for vacation.	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:16:44 -0500	40 lines
Archival Award of Excellence	Metzer, Laren <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:53:50 -0800	61 lines
ARMA International Elections End February 16	JFrost <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:10:57 -0600	35 lines
Career Opportunity: Senior Records Manager	Hurd, Daniel <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:51:55 -0500	56 lines
Classifying Records Management	McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:19:49 -0600	62 lines
Re: Classifying Records Management	Trudy Phillips <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:57:57 -0500	98 lines
Re: Classifying Records Management	Gordon Hoke <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:05:28 -0600	36 lines
Re: Classifying Records Management	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:13:09 -0800	108 lines
Re: Classifying Records Management	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:52:42 -0600	42 lines
Re: Classifying Records Management	McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:14:09 -0600	49 lines
Re: Classifying Records Management	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:57:00 -0500	46 lines
Re: Classifying Records Management	John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:16:16 -0500	33 lines
Re: Classifying Records Management	Alice Young <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:36:07 -0500	46 lines
Re: Classifying Records Management	Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:04:12 -0500	36 lines
Re: Classifying Records Management	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:09:29 -0800	39 lines
Close to OT - RainDrip - Mysterious Scientology Project Raises Questions in Wyoming	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:59:06 -0500	26 lines
Construction of Archival Building - Brief for Architects	Nucoon Blake <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:33:37 +0100	29 lines
Re: Construction of Archival Building - Brief for Architects	Stephen Cohen <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:53:49 -0500	47 lines
Re: Construction of Archival Building - Brief for Architects	Starck, Brian <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:35:27 -0700	54 lines
Re: Construction of Archival Building - Brief for Architects	Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:47:53 -0500	147 lines
Re: Construction of Archival Building - Brief for Architects	Stephen Cohen <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:24:11 -0500	36 lines
Re: Consultation estimate	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:02:36 -0600	80 lines
Re: Consultation estimate	Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:03:23 -0800	122 lines
Re: Consultation estimate	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:14:28 -0500	33 lines
Re: Consultation estimate	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:40:24 -0600	45 lines
Re: Consultation estimate	Stephen Cohen <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:08:33 -0500	53 lines
Re: Consultation estimate	Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:40:48 -0800	93 lines
Copyright	David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:51:15 -0800	31 lines
Re: Copyright	Pilar McAdam <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:25:14 -0800	55 lines
Diary of a Body	Russell D. James <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:33:16 -0600	68 lines
Email archiving retention question	Mrozak, Suzanne <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:25:13 -0500	31 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	Tucker, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:35:43 -0500	44 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:43:53 -0500	125 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:58:07 -0700	52 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:08:43 -0500	50 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:39:18 -0600	55 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:45:44 -0700	32 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:01:09 -0600	37 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:58:07 -0700	67 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	Kevin Tisdel <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:19:44 -0500	73 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	Mrozak, Suzanne <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:35:24 -0500	99 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	Maureen Cusack <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:06:27 -0800	103 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	Josh McLane <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:59:58 -0500	119 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:28:00 -0600	63 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:31:56 -0600	124 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:35:52 -0500	129 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	Maureen Cusack <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:50:53 -0800	34 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	Schmitz Fuhrig, Lynda <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:55:07 -0500	85 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:16:52 -0800	37 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:20:19 -0800	31 lines
Re: Email archiving retention question	John James O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:25:55 +0800	107 lines
Email management software - just the names	Joan Brunning-Symons <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:32:53 -0600	31 lines
Re: Email management software - just the names	Kevin Tisdel <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:04:54 -0500	74 lines
Re: Email management software - just the names	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:47:26 -0700	128 lines
Re: Email management software - just the names	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:55:27 -0700	24 lines
Re: Email management software - just the names	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:12:58 -0600	16 lines
EU REACH Environmental Legislation	Steve Petersen <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:54:29 -0600	55 lines
Re: EU REACH Environmental Legislation	vlemieux <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:35:01 -0000	74 lines
Fantastic Seminar in Northern Virginia	Angela Tayfun <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:56:53 -0500	139 lines
Federal Government in General and Digital Records	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:22:28 -0500	42 lines
Re: Federal Government in General and Digital Records - There You Go Again	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:39:33 -0600	47 lines
Re: Federated Records Management	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:25:42 -0600	63 lines
FW: CRM Seminar - February 27-28	Roffee, Cristina [HMA] <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:26:35 -0800	107 lines
FW: CRM Seminar - Respond by Feb 13 if planning to register	Roffee, Cristina [HMA] <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:27:19 -0800	88 lines
FW: OC ARMA February Event - Thursday, February 19, 2009	Roffee, Cristina [HMA] <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:25:08 -0800	116 lines
FW: [RM] ISO 15489	Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:31:21 -0500	45 lines
FW: [RM] Legal Hold Orders	Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:35:22 -0500	100 lines
FW: [RM] Legal Hold Orders	Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:51:36 -0500	44 lines
Having Minimum Best Policy	Russell D. James <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:57:31 -0600	76 lines
Help...leaving for vacation.	Jennifer Engel <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:47:21 -0800	56 lines
Information Specialist job opportunity	Bergeron, Paul <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:14:26 -0500	54 lines
Re: Information Specialist job opportunity - Irvine, CA not TX	Bergeron, Paul <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:55:51 -0500	67 lines
Intellectual freedom at Cambridge Public Library. Records management. City archives. Archival practices.	don warner saklad <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:05:01 -0500	68 lines
ISO 15489	Joe <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:44:27 -0800	21 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:48:03 -0700	26 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:52:27 -0800	27 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:09:14 -0500	30 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Joe <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:16:54 -0800	74 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:22:54 -0800	81 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:30:15 -0700	24 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Mark Chase <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:34:23 -0500	121 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:32:49 -0800	54 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:34:16 -0800	38 lines
Re: ISO 15489	David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:38:18 -0800	22 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Greene, Ben <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:37:31 -0600	50 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:42:38 -0600	83 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Elizabeth Parker <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:45:42 -0000	109 lines
Re: ISO 15489	David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:55:22 -0800	20 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Erika M Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:22 -0500	153 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:59:00 -0600	37 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:00:21 -0500	29 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:08:33 -0500	38 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:55:54 -0500	82 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Fischer, Linda <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:32:09 -0800	102 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:35:45 -0800	45 lines
Re: ISO 15489	McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:35:27 -0600	40 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:44:54 -0800	36 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Joe <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:50:57 -0800	64 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Bill Benedon <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:58:51 EST	25 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Sanderson, Glen (Swift Technology) <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:14:14 -0000	24 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:21:35 -0500	27 lines
Re: ISO 15489	Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:43:53 -0800	23 lines
Job Announcement - Records Manager - Washington D.C. Area	Rachel Ban <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:37:22 -0500	87 lines
Job Posting - Little Rock AR	Sherry Owen <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:01:21 -0500	32 lines
Job Posting: Records Analyst, Toronto	Wolfe, Ian <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:32:24 -0500	123 lines
KUDOS was Re: [RM] Construction of Archival Building - Brief for Architects	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:19:32 -0500	42 lines
Ledbetter Fair Pay Act	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:21:00 -0800	38 lines
Re: Ledbetter Fair Pay Act	deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:37:32 -0500	42 lines
Ledbetter Fair Pay Act	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:21:00 -0800	53 lines
Re: Ledbetter Fair Pay Act	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:17:22 -0800	38 lines
Legal Hold Orders	Zengel, Rikki <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:55:56 -0500	41 lines
Re: Legal Hold Orders	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:02 -0500	61 lines
Re: Legal Hold Orders	Zengel, Rikki <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:51:29 -0500	67 lines
Re: Legal Hold Orders	McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:14:28 -0600	50 lines
Re: Legal Hold Orders	Barbara Wyton <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:13:48 -0500	30 lines
Re: Legal Hold Orders	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:17:29 -0500	121 lines
Re: Legal Hold Orders	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:24:26 -0500	94 lines
Re: Legal Hold Orders	Deidre Paknad <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:42:54 -0500	86 lines
Re: Legal Hold Orders	Manning, Patricia L (Patti) <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:40:06 -0600	85 lines
Re: Legal Hold Orders	Foster, Christopher <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:48:16 -0600	68 lines
Linda Perry	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:01:12 -0600	23 lines
Marlene Diamond is out of the office.	Marlene Diamond <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:11:17 -0500	17 lines
Memory of the World Online Survey	Luciana Duranti <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:07:19 -0800	84 lines
New blog post - New Orleans Notarial Archives	Russell D. James <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:48:35 -0600	69 lines
Re: New blog post - New Orleans Notarial Archives	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:16:28 -0500	45 lines
New Edgerton Files story posted	Russell D. James <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:15:28 -0600	78 lines
New Information Nation Edition is Available	Nystedt, Sheri <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:26:44 -0700	46 lines
Re: New Information Nation Edition is Available	Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:14:10 -0800	65 lines
New York Times article on Digital Archivists	James Cassedy <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:07:31 -0500	32 lines
Re: New York Times article on Digital Archivists	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:41:33 -0800	48 lines
Re: New York Times article on Digital Archivists (UNCLASSIFIED)	Tyler, Judy K Ms CIV USA MEDCOM CRDAMC <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:33:25 -0600	63 lines
Now OT - RE: [RM] South Carolina ARMA Chapters Joint Seminar - March 18	Colgan, Julie J. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:07:04 -0500	29 lines
Re: Now OT - RE: [RM] South Carolina ARMA Chapters Joint Seminar - March 18	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:18:41 -0700	26 lines
Re: Now OT - South Carolina ARMA Chapters Joint Seminar - March 18	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:18:40 -0600	28 lines
OT - Foxit Reader Difficulties	Jon Quandt <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:42:22 -0500	37 lines
Re: OT - Foxit Reader Difficulties	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:39:58 -0500	72 lines
Re: OT - Foxit Reader Difficulties	Jon Quandt <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:58:53 -0500	96 lines
Re: OT - Foxit Reader Difficulties	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:55:45 -0500	35 lines
Re: OT - Foxit Reader Difficulties	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:04:23 -0700	21 lines
Re: OT - Foxit Reader Difficulties	Jon Quandt <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:28:48 -0500	71 lines
Plant Closing Process	Mario Rieger <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:53:24 -0500	35 lines
Re: Plant Closing Process	Mario Rieger <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:16:00 -0500	55 lines
Question about Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Retention	Carrie Fager <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:57:10 -0600	39 lines
Re: Question about Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Retention	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:08:08 -0500	47 lines
Re: Question about Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Retention	deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:11:23 -0500	52 lines
Re: Question about Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Retention	Christian Meinke <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:59:58 -0800	53 lines
Re: Question about Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Retention	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:08:08 -0500	62 lines
RAIN 20090202 CyberCemetery, MS IP Theft, Offline Gmail, Ephemera, Compliance	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:47:55 -0500	285 lines
RainDrip: NARA and Digital Records	Piotrowski, Charles <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:06:07 -0500	22 lines
Re: RainDrip: NARA and Digital Records	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:49:33 -0500	29 lines
RAINDrop - World's Greatest Hacker Says Obama's BlackBerry Can Be Breached	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:12:20 -0800	35 lines
Raindrop: MS Exchange alternative unveiled	Colgan, Julie J. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:14:41 -0500	49 lines
Retention Coding System	Lori Calovich <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:57:19 -0600	36 lines
Re: Retention Coding System	Cindy Zuvich <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:58:08 -0800	65 lines
RIM Month?	Rich Wilson <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:37:54 -0700	32 lines
Re: RIM Month?	Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:03:09 -0500	29 lines
Re: RIM Month?	Stephanie Jones <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:11:32 -0600	37 lines
Set No Mail	Kathy Clark <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:57:03 -0500	21 lines
SharePoint search: Good enough for the enterprise?	Jean Graef <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 8 Feb 2009 07:23:32 -0800	30 lines
South Carolina ARMA Chapters Joint Seminar - March 18	Colgan, Julie J. <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:49:40 -0500	86 lines
Re: South Carolina ARMA Chapters Joint Seminar - March 18	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:08:29 -0800	35 lines
Spring Seminar in Denver	Chris Ames <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:53:03 -0700	43 lines
Thank you - Consultation estimate	Mary McKay <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:16:24 -0800	41 lines
Twitter group for archivists and records managers	Russell D. James <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:05:49 -0600	69 lines
Re: Twitter group for archivists and records managers	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:46:14 -0500	36 lines
University Records Management Benchmarking	Vandenberg, Erin <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:41:44 -0600	41 lines
Re: University Records Management Benchmarking	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:51:48 -0700	28 lines
Re: University Records Management Benchmarking	Westlund, Dawn Cheryl <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:24:22 -0500	31 lines
Versatile Retention software from Zasio	Davis Baxley <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:22:41 -0500	68 lines
Re: Versatile Retention software from Zasio	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:05:22 -0500	75 lines
Re: Versatile Retention software from Zasio	bobd <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:01:50 -0800	51 lines
Re: Versatile Retention software from Zasio	Bartholomew, John C <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:09:43 -0500	81 lines
Re: Versatile Retention software from Zasio	Acevedo, Alex <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:41:20 -0800	46 lines
Re: Versatile Retention software from Zasio	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:15:16 -0500	42 lines
What is Cloud Computing, really?	Colgan, Julie J. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:04:32 -0500	51 lines
Re: What is Cloud Computing, really?	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:26:48 -0500	43 lines
Re: What is Cloud Computing, really?	Colgan, Julie J. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:17:47 -0500	34 lines
Re: What is Cloud Computing, really?	Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:53:36 -0800	21 lines

Back to: Main RECMGMT-L Page

LISTS.UFL.EDU

RECMGMT-L Archives

February 2009, Week 2

Subject

From

Date

Size