LISTSERV 15.5 - RECMGMT-L Archives - February 2009, week 3

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

RECMGMT-L Archives

February 2009, Week 3

Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Search Archives

Subject	From	Date	Size
A Place for Records/Information Managers	Alice Young <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:35:05 -0500	49 lines
Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:22:41 -0800	28 lines
Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:33:33 -0500	22 lines
Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers	David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:01:43 -0800	16 lines
Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:03:13 -0600	69 lines
Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers	Trudy M Phillips <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:53:44 EST	104 lines
Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers	Cindy Zuvich <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:09:01 -0800	92 lines
Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:34:00 -0600	22 lines
Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers	sasha babin <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:31:02 -0800	58 lines
ARMA 2009 Election Results	PeterK <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:27:39 -0500	68 lines
Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results	Starck, Brian <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:22:55 -0700	27 lines
Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:36:52 -0700	37 lines
Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results	Barbara Wyton <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:08:59 -0500	31 lines
Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:40:49 -0500	36 lines
Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results	Bill Benedon <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:51:34 EST	32 lines
Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:01:20 -0500	28 lines
Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results	Alice Young <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:05:00 -0500	47 lines
Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results	Bill Benedon <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:10:34 EST	22 lines
Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results	Rich Wilson <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:40:17 -0700	88 lines
Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results	John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:01:23 -0500	28 lines
Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:28:31 -0600	53 lines
Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:58:45 -0800	33 lines
Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results	Bill Benedon <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:07:02 EST	25 lines
Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results	JFrost <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:01:05 -0600	116 lines
Re: ARMA 2009, period	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:22:02 -0500	71 lines
Re: ARMA 2009, period	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:08:54 -0800	30 lines
ARMA International Elections End TODAY!	JFrost <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:07:20 -0600	35 lines
Barracuda Message Archiver	Joan Brunning-Symons <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:05:39 -0600	32 lines
By David L. Harris http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/education/x679399496/State-says-Cambridge-Public-Schools-cant-charge-14K-for-public-records	don warner saklad <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:03:35 -0500	17 lines
Re: Classifying Records Management	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:58:28 -0500	36 lines
Re: Consultation estimate	Christopher Varlack <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:56:32 -0400	37 lines
Definition of a Record	Bartholomew, John C <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:22:04 -0500	40 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Chrosniak, Danielle M. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:26:08 -0500	69 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:32:20 -0500	64 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:33:12 -0600	51 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Trudy M Phillips <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:31:38 EST	31 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:37:44 -0500	37 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:43:01 -0700	23 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Wilson, Jeffery <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:57:35 -0500	45 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Garrison, Linda - ARA <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:32:01 -0600	108 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Brenda Parnes <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:40:15 -0500	88 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Joe <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:15:55 -0800	83 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Susan Beamer <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:26:22 -0800	114 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Alice Young <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:34:43 -0500	39 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Millican & Associates, Inc. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:49:07 -0500	42 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Marge Sroka <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:59:27 -0800	16 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:14:35 -0800	59 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:43:52 -0500	26 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Bartholomew, John C <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:54:32 -0500	68 lines
Re: Definition of a Record	Frank Addamo <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:48:59 -0800	79 lines
FACT Act Red Flag Rules and Records Management	McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:00:26 -0600	67 lines
Re: FACT Act Red Flag Rules and Records Management	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:01:31 -0500	37 lines
Re: FACT Act Red Flag Rules and Records Management	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:04:08 -0500	37 lines
Re: FACT Act Red Flag Rules and Records Management	Christian Meinke <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:25:33 -0800	119 lines
Fees for Service	Tuckett, David <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:31:19 -0800	28 lines
Re: Fees for Service	Allen, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:47:47 -0400	60 lines
Re: Fees for Service	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:36:04 -0600	37 lines
Re: Fees for Service	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:05:30 -0500	44 lines
FW: CRM Seminar - 6 or more participants needed	Cristina Roffee <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:15:43 -0800	49 lines
FW: Time Tip-Success Diary	Stephanie Jones <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:52:38 -0600	46 lines
FW: [RM] Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...	Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:21:48 -0500	90 lines
Re: FW: [RM] Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:55:45 -0500	63 lines
Re: FW: [RM] Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...	Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:14:30 -0500	59 lines
Re: FW: [RM] Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...	deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:16:55 -0500	139 lines
FW: [RM] Set No Mail	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:42:48 -0600	39 lines
Re: FW: [RM] Set No Mail	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:58:05 -0500	59 lines
HIPAA Related: Resolution Agreement with CVS Pharmacy, Inc.	Westlund, Dawn Cheryl <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:38:23 -0500	106 lines
InnoCielo	Linda Buss <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:43:53 +0000	25 lines
Job Announcement - Two Archivist Positions, NARA, Laguna Niguel, CA	Cathy Westfeldt <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:43:06 -0800	42 lines
Job Posting US-FL-Fort Myers CRM preferred	PeterK <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:46:31 -0500	22 lines
Kimberley A Luff is out of the office.	Kimberley A Luff <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:01:06 -0500	18 lines
Kimberley A Luff is out of the office.	Kimberley A Luff <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:49:22 -0500	18 lines
Re: Legal Hold Orders	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:08:06 -0500	24 lines
LinkedIn	Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:37:33 -0800	29 lines
Re: LinkedIn	JFrost <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 21 Feb 2009 06:58:54 -0600	71 lines
Re: LinkedIn	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:40:49 -0500	48 lines
Re: LinkedIn	Trudy M Phillips <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:05:25 EST	77 lines
Re: LinkedIn	Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:33:36 -0800	35 lines
Mainframe Computer Service	Mary R. Ott <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:02:57 -0600	41 lines
Re: Mainframe Computer Service	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:36:00 -0500	47 lines
Re: Mainframe Computer Service	Tom Utiger <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:59:53 -0800	38 lines
Re: Mainframe Computer Service (Problems)	Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:36:42 -0500	47 lines
Re: Mainframe Computer Service (Problems)	Jay Maechtlen <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:49:06 -0800	74 lines
Re: Mainframe Computer Service (Problems)	Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:53:24 -0500	63 lines
Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...	Debbie Wolf <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:04:49 -0500	49 lines
Re: Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:05:35 -0500	104 lines
Media Type Requirements?	Greene, Ben <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:07:58 -0600	84 lines
Re: Media Type Requirements?	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:47:10 -0500	80 lines
Re: Media Type Requirements?	Greene, Ben <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:14:13 -0600	32 lines
Mixed Messages in Marble	Russell D. James <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:29:47 -0600	73 lines
NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:04:40 -0600	59 lines
Re: NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Hilliard, Mary <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:44:48 -0600	33 lines
Re: NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Pat Franks <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:05:31 -0500	62 lines
Re: NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:56:51 -0600	36 lines
Re: now OT OT [RM] Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:14:48 -0800	44 lines
Re: Plant Closing Process	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:15:05 -0500	29 lines
Process-Focused Retention Schedule	deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:04:06 -0500	78 lines
Re: Question about Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Retention	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:48:36 -0500	31 lines
Re: RAIN - Sign of the Times	Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:27:50 -0500	44 lines
Re: RAIN - Sign of the Times	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:04:05 -0500	34 lines
Re: RAIN - Sign of the Times	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:13:01 -0500	51 lines
Re: RAIN - Sign of the Times	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:15:18 -0500	42 lines
RAIN 20090204 Espionage, spoliation, wiped, data losses	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:50:01 -0500	267 lines
RAIN 20090206 Deed Loss, Server Wiped, Data breaches, Redaction tool	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:42:59 -0500	317 lines
RAIN 20090209 Digital Archivists, backup system, record tampering probed	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:26:45 -0500	109 lines
RAINdrop White House documents missing	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:38:56 -0500	37 lines
RAINDrop: Produce the Note	Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:57:18 -0800	24 lines
RAINDrop: The Diamondback Online - Natl. archivist becomes professor	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:21:14 -0500	32 lines
Receive 5.5 ICRM Certification Maintenance Program (CMP) credits	Angela Tayfun <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:26:26 -0500	88 lines
Record Retention and the Lily Ledbetter Act	deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:18:21 -0500	96 lines
Re: Record Retention and the Lily Ledbetter Act	Starck, Brian <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:46:18 -0700	65 lines
Re: Record Retention and the Lily Ledbetter Act	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:50:06 -0800	53 lines
Report on Preservation and Access for Scientific Data	Mark Conrad <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:52:41 -0500	43 lines
RIM Month	John Frost <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:53:07 +0000	28 lines
SAA, Ethical Codes, & Present Potential and Real Problems	Russell D. James <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:21:14 -0600	73 lines
Re: Set No Mail	Brian Litster <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:22:38 -0700	15 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - suggestion as to How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Tom Dale <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:33:08 -0500	138 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	JFrost <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:05:11 -0600	94 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Pat Franks <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:42:39 -0500	32 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:09:04 -0800	50 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:39:52 -0800	28 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:55:08 -0800	28 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Hilliard, Mary <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:58:20 -0600	26 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:01:01 -0800	34 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	bobd <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:09:09 -0800	91 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:23:41 -0500	35 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:30:42 -0800	32 lines
THANK-YOU!! -- RE: ARMA 2009 Election Results	Records Management <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:41:05 -1000	119 lines
WAS Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:39:44 -0500	66 lines
When PDFs Attack - Acrobat [Reader] 0-Day On the Loose	Alan A Andolsen CMC CRM <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:23:29 -0500	40 lines

Back to: Main RECMGMT-L Page

LISTS.UFL.EDU

RECMGMT-L Archives

February 2009, Week 3

Subject

From

Date

Size