LISTSERV 15.5 - RECMGMT-L Archives - February 2009, week 4

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

RECMGMT-L Archives

February 2009, Week 4

Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Search Archives

Subject	From	Date	Size
"Produce the Note" (aka good records management)	Tom Wilson <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:46:31 -0600	42 lines
Re: "Produce the Note" (aka good records management)	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:04:30 -0500	37 lines
Re: "Produce the Note" (aka good records management)	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:06:06 -0500	36 lines
Re: "Produce the Note" (aka good records management)	Trudy M Phillips <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:07:22 EST	77 lines
Re: "Produce the Note" (aka good records management)	Jon Quandt <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:15:18 -0500	135 lines
"The Records Professions" event at the University of Tennessee	Sarah Shippy Copeland <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:51:19 -0500	70 lines
Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers	Philanthi Koslowski <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:43:23 -0500	87 lines
Academic ECM Implementation Case Studies	David Read <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:11:38 -0700	36 lines
Re: Academic ECM Implementation Case Studies	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:32:38 -0800	26 lines
Re: Academic ECM Implementation Case Studies	Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:13:40 -0800	42 lines
ADMIN WAS Take it Offline was Re: [RM] IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:58:29 -0500	37 lines
Angela Cooper is out of the office.	Angela Cooper <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:00:16 -0500	19 lines
ARMA Austin Spring Seminar: ARMA Austin Presents JOHN ISAZA, Esq.	Karen Ullrich <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:15:27 -0600	39 lines
ARMA Metro NYC Meeting on RIM Competencies	Crystal Cutler <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:31:05 -0500	32 lines
Re: Blue Milk	Lorinda Kasten-Lowerre <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:01:52 -0800	23 lines
Cloud Computing Follow-up	Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:58:53 -0500	39 lines
Construction Document Management Application	Lori Calovich <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:56:53 -0600	41 lines
Re: Construction Document Management Application	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:02:43 -0600	70 lines
Re: Construction Document Management Application	Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:02:52 -0500	71 lines
Re: Construction Document Management Application	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:07:13 -0500	60 lines
Re: Construction Document Management Application	Starck, Brian <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:59:52 -0700	64 lines
Re: Construction Document Management Application	Mahieddine Hamdani <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:53:56 +0300	93 lines
Re: Construction Document Management Application	Lori Calovich <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:54:47 -0600	106 lines
Re: Construction Document Management Application	Susan <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:50:33 -0500	28 lines
Electronic Personnel Files	Lori Calovich <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:10:58 -0600	40 lines
FW: Mainframe Computer Service (Problems)	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:43:09 -0600	185 lines
FW: [RM] Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...	Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:11:59 -0500	45 lines
Re: FW: [RM] Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:43:34 -0500	70 lines
Re: FW: [RM] Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...	Josee Dallaire <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:30:13 -0500	167 lines
Re: FW: [RM] Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:49:50 -0500	36 lines
Fwd: Call for Comment: ARMA International's Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles	PeterK <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:15:24 -0500	65 lines
ICRM Spring Exam Cycle AND applying for candidacy	WILLIAM W LEFEVRE <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:40:19 -0500	44 lines
Re: ICRM Spring Exam Cycle AND applying for candidacy	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:44:10 -0800	70 lines
IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	pakurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:10:57 +0000	31 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:37:51 -0500	58 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:45:41 -0500	46 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:15:19 -0500	51 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:29:52 -0800	41 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:36:54 -0700	20 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:36:58 -0800	29 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:09:26 -0500	31 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:21:42 -0500	42 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:35:07 -0800	89 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:45:12 -0700	36 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:37:42 -0500	70 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:44:41 -0800	106 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:55:03 -0500	151 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Stephen Cohen <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:00:15 -0500	30 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:42:48 -0500	44 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:31:50 -0500	31 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:35:15 -0800	73 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That	John Phillips <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:36:12 -0500	63 lines
Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email and U.S. Law is Generally OK with That (UNCLASSIFIED)	Tyler, Judy K Ms CIV USA MEDCOM CRDAMC <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:41:54 -0600	52 lines
Re: LinkedIn	Evans Kitty <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:20:00 -0600	21 lines
Re: Mainframe Computer Service	Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:04:32 -0500	46 lines
Re: Mainframe Computer Service (Problems)	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:32:01 -0600	182 lines
Re: Mainframe Computer Service (Problems)	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:11:27 -0800	30 lines
Re: Mainframe Computer Service (Problems)	Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:41:37 -0600	47 lines
Re: Mainframe Computer Service (Problems)	Jay Maechtlen <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:53:44 -0800	47 lines
Re: Mainframe Computer Service (Problems)	Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:45:56 -0500	66 lines
Metadata in the courts	Dana Yanaway <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:24:16 -0500	86 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:13:32 -0500	49 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:38:13 -0800	58 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:04:05 -0700	97 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:15:44 -0500	126 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:13:33 -0800	33 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:26:08 -0700	31 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Colgan, Julie J. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:30:24 -0500	24 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Eaton, David <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:47:49 -0500	62 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:52:37 -0800	31 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:59:16 -0800	29 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Dana Yanaway <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:54:54 -0500	66 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:10:04 -0700	34 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Colgan, Julie J. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:40:59 -0500	24 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:46:36 -0500	47 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:44:17 -0800	55 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:50:47 -0700	38 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Randy Preston <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:53:48 -0800	184 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Dana Yanaway <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:35:47 -0500	223 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	John Phillips <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:43:52 -0500	111 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Colgan, Julie J. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:11:29 -0500	26 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:14:03 -0800	39 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	John Phillips <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:54:00 -0500	55 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:57:09 -0800	56 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Randy Preston <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:01:14 -0800	101 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:22:00 -0800	28 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Randy Preston <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:23:54 -0800	133 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:33:50 -0800	28 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Randy Preston <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:04:23 -0800	39 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:00:51 -0700	36 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	John Phillips <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:28:08 -0500	132 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Christian Meinke <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:35:54 -0800	65 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Randy Preston <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:45:57 -0800	166 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Mimi Dionne <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:48:35 -0800	44 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:06:28 -0500	29 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Mimi Dionne <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:14:13 -0800	57 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	NKhramtsovsky <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:30:57 +0300	32 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Randy Preston <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:49:03 -0800	48 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:01:33 -0700	44 lines
Re: Metadata in the courts	John Phillips <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:34:30 -0500	90 lines
Mid-Michigan Spring Seminar - ICRM Workshop and ERM Case Study	Kiersten Ward <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:38:08 -0500	133 lines
Monitoring and recording phone calls	David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:57:37 -0800	20 lines
NARA Southwest E-Records Forum/RACO Texas Pre-approved CM credits from ICRM and ACA	Bill Fellers <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:46:41 -0500	53 lines
No reply. Boston City Council President. By email please send the stenographic machine records of the last Boston City Council public meeting...	don warner saklad <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:18:33 -0500	45 lines
On-Line RM Training - ARMA Gaith 3/11 Meeting - Rosalye Settles - OTS	John Milligan <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:46:28 -0800	68 lines
Organizing Personal Digital Stuff	pakurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:12:08 +0000	56 lines
OT: Your Keyboard	Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:07:33 -0500	29 lines
RAIN 20090212 Blago papers, Queensland history, Personal data on ebay, Lost treasures	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:22:34 -0500	230 lines
RAIN 20090214 Love Letters, Archivist turned spymaster, Historical email, NU archivist	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:56:32 -0500	284 lines
RAIN 20090216 Compliance Challenges, NYC Buildings, Underground Storage	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:48:54 -0500	278 lines
RAIN 20090218 Bush Library, Dayton News Archive,. Leaky dome, Indonesia	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:12:11 -0500	226 lines
RAIN 20090220 Nagin Emails, email archiving, WH server outage, Canisius Archives, Leverage RM, Online Archiving	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:41:36 -0500	416 lines
RAIN 2090210 Deeds Lost, Bookbinder, Bugs Save, Compliance Workshop, A-rod	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:59:04 -0500	309 lines
RAIN Drop - Archaeologist finds map of Knox from Civil War	Curtis, Donna P (WDP) <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:45:00 -0500	26 lines
RAIN Drop - Parliamentarian says hundreds of documents missing	Hilliard, Mary <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:10:08 -0600	23 lines
RAINdrip: File System Management Headed for Trouble	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:36:35 -0500	42 lines
Re: RAINdrip: File System Management Headed for Trouble	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:46:28 -0600	77 lines
Re: RAINdrip: File System Management Headed for Trouble	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:07:44 -0500	76 lines
Re: RAINdrip: File System Management Headed for Trouble	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:16:30 -0800	36 lines
Re: RAINdrip: File System Management Headed for Trouble	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:16:56 -0600	43 lines
Re: RAINdrip: File System Management Headed for Trouble	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:18:45 -0600	22 lines
Re: RAINdrip: File System Management Headed for Trouble	John Phillips <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:11:19 -0500	89 lines
Re: RAINdrip: File System Management Headed for Trouble	Carolyn Denton <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:34:14 -0500	119 lines
Re: RAINdrip: File System Management Headed for Trouble	John Phillips <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:22:44 -0500	182 lines
RAINDrop - FCC Proposes Fines Over Data Protection	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:18:38 -0800	28 lines
Raindrop: A&M faulted in boat death because of records	Meg Carpenter <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:29:12 -0500	27 lines
Rants & Raves	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:54:07 -0600	24 lines
Re; RAIN Story on Guidance Software	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:00:39 -0500	68 lines
Records Management job classifications	David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:40:41 -0800	27 lines
Records Seminar - Washington DC	Doug Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:13:51 -0800	31 lines
Records that require audit trails	Lori Calovich <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:13:46 -0600	40 lines
RM technology panel participants	Colgan, Julie J. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:27:43 -0500	85 lines
SharePoint	Mary R. Ott <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:03:32 -0600	25 lines
Re: SharePoint	Don Lueders <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:30:47 -0500	69 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:32:53 -0500	54 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:54:00 -0500	76 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:16:30 -0500	39 lines
Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:40:08 -0500	27 lines
Stenographic machine records of public meetings of our Boston City Council	don warner saklad <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:39:39 -0500	17 lines
WAS Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email NOW?? Personal hygiene!!	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:15:09 -0500	23 lines
Re: WAS Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email...	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:59:30 -0800	51 lines
WAS Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email... NOW: Skilled young workers need for technology	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:45:47 -0500	106 lines
Re: WAS Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email... NOW: Skilled young workers need for technology	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:50:05 -0700	59 lines
Re: WAS Re: IT Workers Read Your Personal Email... NOW: Skilled young workers need for technology	David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:08:50 -0800	26 lines
WAS Re: LinkedIn NOW: Plaxo	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:26:28 -0500	72 lines
WAS Re: RAINdrip: File System Management NOW: Blue Milk	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:04:20 -0500	66 lines
Re: WAS Re: RAINdrip: File System Management NOW: Blue Milk	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:07:07 -0800	27 lines
Re: WAS Re: RAINdrip: File System Management NOW: Blue Milk	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:11:40 -0500	19 lines
Re: WAS Re: RAINdrip: File System Management NOW: Blue Milk	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:13:15 -0600	32 lines
Re: WAS Re: RAINdrip: File System Management NOW: Blue Milk	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:54:04 -0800	59 lines
Re: WAS Re: RAINdrip: File System Management NOW: Blue Milk	Susan Fitch Brown <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:05:29 -0500	48 lines

Back to: Main RECMGMT-L Page

LISTS.UFL.EDU

RECMGMT-L Archives

February 2009, Week 4

Subject

From

Date

Size