LRNASST-L archives – February 2009, 2

Sort by:	Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first
Options:	Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents Advanced Search

1. Academic Probation
   • Academic Probation (35 lines)
     From: Yard, James <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:35:59 -0500
   • Re: Academic Probation (64 lines)
     From: Kate Jakobson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:52:23 -0500
   • Re: Academic Probation (53 lines)
     From: Dr. Beverly Richardson-Blake <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:57:46 -0500
   • Re: Academic Probation (72 lines)
     From: Deanne Chung <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:03:36 -0600
   • Re: Academic Probation (1284 lines)
     From: Cleveland, Prof. John P. <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:23:12 -0500
   • Re: Academic Probation (57 lines)
     From: Mark May <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:43:19 -0500
   • Re: Academic Probation (57 lines)
     From: Janice Heerspink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:47:21 -0500
   • Re: Academic Probation (61 lines)
     From: Golson, Martin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:26:26 -0600
   • Re: Academic Probation (81 lines)
     From: Wallace, Beverly <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:32:49 -0500
   • Re: Academic Probation (824 lines)
     From: Sondheimer, Karen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:23:42 -0500
   • Re: Academic Probation (61 lines)
     From: Carole J. Basak <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:45:55 -0600
   • Re: Academic Probation (637 lines)
     From: Kremen, Phyllis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:44:06 -0500
   • Academic Probation (33 lines)
     From: Yard, James <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:59:14 -0500
   • Re: Academic Probation (67 lines)
     From: Higgins, Peter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:05:29 -0500
   • Re: Academic Probation (64 lines)
     From: Mary Greiss-Shipley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:14:39 -0500

2. another deeply profound game
   • another deeply profound game (87 lines)
     From: Kathryn Van Wagoner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:33:04 -0700
   • Re: another deeply profound game (117 lines)
     From: Nora Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:10:07 -0600
   • Re: another deeply profound game (136 lines)
     From: Francesca Cordova <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:32:49 -0800
   • Re: another deeply profound game (187 lines)
     From: Vick, Tim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:47:04 -0500
   • Re: another deeply profound game (179 lines)
     From: Eileen Howell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:53:46 -0500
   • Re: another deeply profound game (250 lines)
     From: Nic Voge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:53:49 -0800
   • Re: another deeply profound game (281 lines)
     From: Eileen Howell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:07:33 -0500
   • Re: another deeply profound game (159 lines)
     From: Roberta Schotka <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:33:15 -0500
   • Re: another deeply profound game (213 lines)
     From: Evanthia Rosati <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:06:47 -0600
   • Re: another deeply profound game (190 lines)
     From: Kathryn Van Wagoner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:08:22 -0700
   • Re: another deeply profound game (302 lines)
     From: Pat Nelson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:52:53 -0700

3. ANSWER to another deeply profound game
   • Re: ANSWER to another deeply profound game (215 lines)
     From: Kathryn Van Wagoner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:11:07 -0700

4. Blindman's Bluff
   • Blindman's Bluff (139 lines)
     From: Ray Sanchez <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:55:05 -0800
   • Re: Blindman's Bluff (182 lines)
     From: Jeanne L Higbee <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:07:03 -0600
   • Re: Blindman's Bluff (216 lines)
     From: Deanne Chung <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:23:55 -0600
   • Re: Blindman's Bluff (229 lines)
     From: Jeanne L Higbee <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:46:18 -0600
   • Re: Blindman's Bluff (223 lines)
     From: Golson, Martin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:51:46 -0600
   • Re: Blindman's Bluff (359 lines)
     From: Nic Voge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:47:37 -0800
   • Re: Blindman's Bluff (374 lines)
     From: Golson, Martin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:02:19 -0600
   • Re: Blindman's Bluff (506 lines)
     From: Nic Voge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:37:28 -0800
   • Re: Blindman's Bluff (117 lines)
     From: Vick, Tim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:05:55 -0500
   • Re: Blindman's Bluff (547 lines)
     From: Laura Symons <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:06:14 -0500
   • Re: Blindman's Bluff (180 lines)
     From: Nic Voge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:24:09 -0800
   • Re: Blindman's Bluff (398 lines)
     From: Ray Sanchez <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:10:15 -0800
   • Re: Blindman's Bluff (405 lines)
     From: Ray Sanchez <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:10:15 -0800

5. Budgeting Assistance requested
   • Budgeting Assistance requested (42 lines)
     From: Garland, Diana K <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:06:49 -0600
   • Re: Budgeting Assistance requested (64 lines)
     From: Jenny Briney <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:18:47 -0600

6. Communication Training
   • Communication Training (35 lines)
     From: Julie Luekenga <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:19:55 -0700
   • Re: Communication Training (68 lines)
     From: Maher, Patricia <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:26:01 -0500
   • Re: Communication Training (93 lines)
     From: Mary Greiss-Shipley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:54:49 -0500
   • Re: Communication Training (62 lines)
     From: Kat Powell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:39:42 -0700

7. COMPASS/Accuplacor
   • COMPASS/Accuplacor (631 lines)
     From: Derryberry, Kelly <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:28:19 -0700
   • Re: COMPASS/Accuplacor (73 lines)
     From: Frailey, Marty <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:50:18 -0700
   • Re: COMPASS/Accuplacor (50 lines)
     From: Caverly, David <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:20:48 -0600

8. Cooperative Learning and POGIL
   • Re: Cooperative Learning and POGIL (92 lines)
     From: Sara Weertz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:24:50 -0600

9. Data on Probation Recovery Courses
   • Data on Probation Recovery Courses (47 lines)
     From: Sondheimer, Karen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:57:38 -0500
   • Re: Data on Probation Recovery Courses (61 lines)
     From: Nora Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:07:32 -0600
   • Re: Data on Probation Recovery Courses (98 lines)
     From: Mayer, Lynn <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:08:56 -0800
   • Re: Data on Probation Recovery Courses (57 lines)
     From: Sara Weertz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:34:55 -0600
   • Re: Data on Probation Recovery Courses (98 lines)
     From: Sanders, Karla <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:37:33 -0600
   • Re: Data on Probation Recovery Courses (89 lines)
     From: Paula Simko <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:09:43 -0500
   • Re: Data on Probation Recovery Courses (79 lines)
     From: Travis Ramage <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:48:18 -0600
   • Re: Data on Probation Recovery Courses (79 lines)
     From: Barbara Kirkwood <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:46:20 -0500

10. Data regarding Probation Recovery Courses
    • Data regarding Probation Recovery Courses (689 lines)
      From: Sondheimer, Karen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:11:52 -0500

11. Deep but not Profound--The Answer
    • Re: Deep but not Profound--The Answer (70 lines)
      From: Francesca Cordova <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:45:22 -0800

12. Deeply, Profoundly Sorry
    • Deeply, Profoundly Sorry (30 lines)
      From: Sara Weertz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:46:48 -0600
    • Re: Deeply, Profoundly Sorry (54 lines)
      From: Eileen Howell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:59:56 -0500

13. digest version?
    • digest version? (32 lines)
      From: Marcy Morris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:47:28 -0800

14. From NRC.....resolutions on online publication
    • From NRC.....resolutions on online publication (578 lines)
      From: Norm Stahl <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:13:31 -0600

15. Fundraising for Tutoring Centers
    • Fundraising for Tutoring Centers (40 lines)
      From: Cleveland, Prof. John P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 09:49:02 -0500
    • Re: Fundraising for Tutoring Centers (63 lines)
      From: Michele Doney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:09:30 -0500
    • Re: Fundraising for Tutoring Centers (66 lines)
      From: Sabbadini, Rita C. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:05:53 -0800
    • Re: Fundraising for Tutoring Centers (137 lines)
      From: Jennifer Fasy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:18:59 -0500

16. FW: Deep but not Profound--The Answer
    • FW: Deep but not Profound--The Answer (61 lines)
      From: Sara Weertz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:43:34 -0600

17. FW: RE: Academic Probation
    • FW: RE: Academic Probation (98 lines)
      From: COLEMAN, CARA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:27:18 -0500

18. hats? yes or no
    • hats? yes or no (29 lines)
      From: Kathryn Van Wagoner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:25:41 -0700
    • Re: hats? yes or no (31 lines)
      From: Robert Danberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:38:49 -0500
    • Re: hats? yes or no (47 lines)
      From: Kremen, Phyllis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:35:42 -0500
    • Re: hats? yes or no (60 lines)
      From: Cleveland, Prof. John P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:40:02 -0500
    • Re: hats? yes or no (51 lines)
      From: Peter Rutledge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:40:10 -0500
    • Re: hats? yes or no (73 lines)
      From: M.E. McWilliams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:06:48 -0600
    • Re: hats? yes or no (66 lines)
      From: VERA MAYES <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:09:20 -0500
    • Re: hats? yes or no (54 lines)
      From: Kathryn Van Wagoner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:42:39 -0700
    • Re: hats? yes or no (90 lines)
      From: Jan Norton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:43:43 -0600
    • Re: hats? yes or no (114 lines)
      From: Underwood, Peggy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:48:36 -0500
    • Re: hats? yes or no (45 lines)
      From: Golson, Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:53:41 -0600
    • Re: hats? yes or no (74 lines)
      From: Jan Norton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:05:13 -0600
    • Re: hats? yes or no (88 lines)
      From: Golson, Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:11:56 -0600
    • Re: hats? yes or no (97 lines)
      From: Ertel, Susan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:17:12 -0700
    • Re: hats? yes or no (156 lines)
      From: Chris Glover <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:29:29 -0800
    • Re: hats? yes or no (138 lines)
      From: Lisa D Baker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:31:13 -0500
    • Re: hats? yes or no (129 lines)
      From: Worden, Elizabeth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:55:20 -0500
    • Re: hats? yes or no (202 lines)
      From: Reggie Jean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:57:15 -0500
    • Re: hats? yes or no (50 lines)
      From: Michele Doney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:44:26 -0500
    • Re: hats? yes or no (152 lines)
      From: Charlene Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:06:02 -0500
    • Re: hats? yes or no (107 lines)
      From: Janice Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:55:30 -0500

19. hats? yes or no ... Dress Code?
    • Re: hats? yes or no ... Dress Code? (145 lines)
      From: Ray Sanchez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:46:19 -0800

20. Living and Learning Communities - Faculty Development
    • Living and Learning Communities - Faculty Development (49 lines)
      From: Holly M. Andress (Martin) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:56:44 -0600
    • Re: Living and Learning Communities - Faculty Development (3464 lines)
      From: Ulanda Forbess <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:15:53 -0600

21. Mentor training activities needed
    • Mentor training activities needed (37 lines)
      From: COLEMAN, CARA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:49:51 -0500
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (68 lines)
      From: M.E. McWilliams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:04:49 -0600
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (99 lines)
      From: Christine Flax <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:26:49 -0500
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (103 lines)
      From: Jeanne L Higbee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:59:20 -0600
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (87 lines)
      From: Lois Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:01:10 -0500
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (54 lines)
      From: Jennifer Fasy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:22:47 -0500
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (121 lines)
      From: M.E. McWilliams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:59:34 -0600
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (163 lines)
      From: Jennifer Atwood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:13:50 -0600
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (140 lines)
      From: Francesca Cordova <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:53:27 -0800
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (98 lines)
      From: Kathryn Van Wagoner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:10:23 -0700
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (177 lines)
      From: Cheri L Cruz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:38:33 -0800
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (198 lines)
      From: Francesca Cordova <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:56:20 -0800
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (205 lines)
      From: Birkholz-Benter, Irene <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:13:14 -0600
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (62 lines)
      From: Lois B. Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:39:25 -0500
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (103 lines)
      From: Jeanne L Higbee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:24:32 -0600
    • Re: Mentor training activities needed (55 lines)
      From: Jeanne L Higbee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:34:26 -0600

22. Mentor training activities--Deep but not Profound
    • Re: Mentor training activities--Deep but not Profound (128 lines)
      From: Sara Weertz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:06:20 -0600
    • Re: Mentor training activities--Deep but not Profound (109 lines)
      From: Sara Weertz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:06:20 -0600
    • Re: Mentor training activities--Deep but not Profound (118 lines)
      From: Golson, Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:01:22 -0600

23. OT: Wellness Centers
    • OT: Wellness Centers (27 lines)
      From: Susan Thurman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:36:16 -0600

24. OTHER Reading placement tests
    • OTHER Reading placement tests (90 lines)
      From: Amy Crouse-Powers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:19:15 -0500
    • Re: OTHER Reading placement tests (120 lines)
      From: Marcy Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:07:34 -0800
    • Re: OTHER Reading placement tests (169 lines)
      From: Amy Crouse-Powers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:22:28 -0500

25. professionalism training
    • professionalism training (171 lines)
      From: Kathryn Van Wagoner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:38:07 -0700
    • Re: professionalism training (33 lines)
      From: Norm Stahl <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:44:39 -0600
    • Re: professionalism training (49 lines)
      From: Tapley, Matthew P <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:04:14 -0600

26. professionalism training for tutors
    • professionalism training for tutors (93 lines)
      From: Kathryn Van Wagoner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:24:07 -0700

27. Proposal for making the listserv less burdensome
    • Proposal for making the listserv less burdensome (580 lines)
      From: Saundra Y McGuire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:25:16 -0600
    • Re: Proposal for making the listserv less burdensome (615 lines)
      From: Tepper, Rosalie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:39:57 -0800
    • Re: Proposal for making the listserv less burdensome (636 lines)
      From: Grabelle, Sam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:06:50 -0500
    • Re: Proposal for making the listserv less burdensome (672 lines)
      From: j42 wade <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:37:54 -0800
    • Re: Proposal for making the listserv less burdensome (688 lines)
      From: Susan Andrien <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:32:42 -0800
    • Re: Proposal for making the listserv less burdensome (1344 lines)
      From: Grabelle, Sam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:41:32 -0500
    • Re: Proposal for making the listserv less burdensome (776 lines)
      From: Kremen, Phyllis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:46:01 -0500

28. Question from U of Akron
    • Question from U of Akron (32 lines)
      From: Levin,Paula B <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:06:52 -0500
    • Re: Question from U of Akron (92 lines)
      From: Nic Voge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:30:10 -0800
    • Re: Question from U of Akron (53 lines)
      From: Kathryn Van Wagoner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:33:38 -0700
    • Re: Question from U of Akron (67 lines)
      From: Afsheen Akbar <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:49:46 -0500
    • Re: Question from U of Akron (72 lines)
      From: Kate Jakobson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:28:26 -0500
    • Re: Question from U of Akron (96 lines)
      From: Caron Mellblom <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:42:29 -0800
    • Re: Question from U of Akron (75 lines)
      From: Alan Thomas Craig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:34:35 -0500
    • Re: Question from U of Akron (102 lines)
      From: Carol Doerfer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:36:50 -0500

29. Re PLTL and acronyms in LSCHE
    • Re PLTL and acronyms in LSCHE (120 lines)
      From: Frank <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:00:38 -0700
    • Re: Re PLTL and acronyms in LSCHE (136 lines)
      From: David-Michael Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:17:16 -0600
    • Re: Re PLTL and acronyms in LSCHE (168 lines)
      From: Frank <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:21:52 -0700

30. Reading Apprenticeship
    • Reading Apprenticeship (39 lines)
      From: Christine Reilly <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:00:08 -0500
    • Re: Reading Apprenticeship (66 lines)
      From: James Sauve <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:24:25 -0800

31. Reading placement tests
    • Reading placement tests (112 lines)
      From: Carol Gleichsner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:16:02 -0500
    • Re: Reading placement tests (67 lines)
      From: Diane Schellack <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:12:16 -0500
    • Re: Reading placement tests (100 lines)
      From: William W. Ziegler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:30:28 -0500
    • Re: Reading placement tests (87 lines)
      From: Karen Agee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:10:48 -0600
    • Re: Reading placement tests (121 lines)
      From: Laura Woodward <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:39:28 -0500
    • Re: Reading placement tests (145 lines)
      From: Susan Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:29:20 -0600
    • Re: Reading placement tests (69 lines)
      From: Quiles, Dolores <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:32:47 -0500

32. remove from list
    • remove from list (23 lines)
      From: Marilyn Seipel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:49:29 -0500

33. Study Groups/Cooperative Learning
    • Study Groups/Cooperative Learning (146 lines)
      From: Richard Trevino <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:26:56 -0600
    • Re: Study Groups/Cooperative Learning (86 lines)
      From: Cleveland, Prof. John P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:36:30 -0500
    • Re: Study Groups/Cooperative Learning (111 lines)
      From: Nic Voge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:07:55 -0800
    • Re: Study Groups/Cooperative Learning (117 lines)
      From: Nic Voge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:07:55 -0800

34. Subject: Re: Mentor training activities--Deep but not Profound
    • Subject: Re: Mentor training activities--Deep but not Profound (23 lines)
      From: Susan Thurman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:41:39 -0600
    • Re: Subject: Re: Mentor training activities--Deep but not Profound (46 lines)
      From: Evanthia Rosati <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:13:01 -0600

35. test center proposal
    • test center proposal (111 lines)
      From: Karyn Schulz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:53:43 -0500

36. Tips for Accounting/Economics Tutors
    • Tips for Accounting/Economics Tutors (41 lines)
      From: Megan Henderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:44:33 -0500
    • Re: Tips for Accounting/Economics Tutors (15542 lines)
      From: Cleveland, Prof. John P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:14:11 -0500
    • Re: Tips for Accounting/Economics Tutors (96 lines)
      From: Wickham, Susan M. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:38:33 -0600
    • Re: Tips for Accounting/Economics Tutors (111 lines)
      From: Cleveland, Prof. John P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:48:36 -0500
    • Re: Tips for Accounting/Economics Tutors (66 lines)
      From: Sabbadini, Rita C. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:48:27 -0800

37. tutor empathy Gibb's Model
    • Re: tutor empathy Gibb's Model (63 lines)
      From: Saundra Y McGuire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 19:56:40 -0600

38. tutoring adult learners
    • tutoring adult learners (26 lines)
      From: Kathryn Van Wagoner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:08:38 -0700
    • Re: tutoring adult learners (46 lines)
      From: Michele Doney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:58:55 -0500

39. Tutoring and Future Careers
    • Tutoring and Future Careers (40 lines)
      From: Megan Henderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:12:54 -0500
    • Re: Tutoring and Future Careers (62 lines)
      From: Karen Agee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:47:14 -0600
    • Re: Tutoring and Future Careers (75 lines)
      From: Rhodes, Grace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:45:28 -0800
    • Re: Tutoring and Future Careers (88 lines)
      From: Gemma R. Garber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:46:06 -0500

40. Use of a reading placement score to help place a student in a math course
    • Use of a reading placement score to help place a student in a math course (37 lines)
      From: =?windows-1252?Q?Sally_Weglinski?= <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:15:01 -0500
    • Re: Use of a reading placement score to help place a student in a math course (70 lines)
      From: Aldrich,Charlene <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:08:28 -0500
    • Re: Use of a reading placement score to help place a student in a math course (63 lines)
      From: Marcy Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:40:21 -0800

41. web-based tutoring referrals
    • web-based tutoring referrals (42 lines)
      From: Michele Doney <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:53:03 -0500
    • Re: web-based tutoring referrals (78 lines)
      From: Diana Bell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:53:14 -0600
    • Re: web-based tutoring referrals (71 lines)
      From: David Ehren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:13:01 -0600
    • Re: web-based tutoring referrals (61 lines)
      From: Kathryn Van Wagoner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:35:18 -0700

42. Writing Center Questions
    • Writing Center Questions (28 lines)
      From: Nicole Perkins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:18:28 -0500
    • Re: Writing Center Questions (61 lines)
      From: Catherine Hennessey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:18:44 -0500
    • Re: Writing Center Questions (50 lines)
      From: Burden, John <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:23:53 -0600
    • Re: Writing Center Questions (63 lines)
      From: Maher, Patricia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:27:29 -0500
    • Re: Writing Center Questions (54 lines)
      From: Kate Jakobson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:41:16 -0500
    • Re: Writing Center Questions (51 lines)
      From: Amy Crouse-Powers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:56:17 -0500
    • Re: Writing Center Questions (80 lines)
      From: Sherman, Marcella <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:03:36 -0500

43. Writing Samples Used for Placement
    • Writing Samples Used for Placement (49 lines)
      From: Ronald D. Illingworth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:47:33 -0900
    • Re: Writing Samples Used for Placement (99 lines)
      From: Fosmire, Ellie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:54:59 -0500
    • Re: Writing Samples Used for Placement (128 lines)
      From: Eileen Howell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:55:42 -0500
    • Re: Writing Samples Used for Placement (65 lines)
      From: Caverly, David <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:53:51 -0600
    • Re: Writing Samples Used for Placement (112 lines)
      From: Kremen, Phyllis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:01:06 -0500
    • Re: Writing Samples Used for Placement (90 lines)
      From: Ronald D. Illingworth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:13:24 -0900
    • Re: Writing Samples Used for Placement (77 lines)
      From: Susan Andrien <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:47:32 -0800
    • Re: Writing Samples Used for Placement (110 lines)
      From: William W. Ziegler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:40:23 -0500
    • Re: Writing Samples Used for Placement (78 lines)
      From: Hunt, Stefanie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:18:18 -0500