LISTSERV 15.5 - RECMGMT-L Archives

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

RECMGMT-L Archives

May 2009, Week 3

Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Search Archives

Subject	From	Date	Size
Computerized health records keep crashing	sasha babin <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 09:12:25 -0700	25 lines
Contract for Services	Levita High <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 11:56:50 -0400	17 lines
Re: Contract for Services	John Glover <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 09:08:31 -0800	47 lines
Re: Contract for Services	Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 12:23:30 -0700	68 lines
Digital Preservation – The Planets Way: 22-24 June 2009, Royal Library Copenhagen, Denmark	Planets Project News Update <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 May 2009 09:58:13 GMT	79 lines
E-mail Archiving - an Free Eforum Webinar	Andy Potter <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 May 2009 12:10:08 -0400	83 lines
Re: E-mail Archiving - an Free Eforum Webinar	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 May 2009 13:17:04 -0400	66 lines
Everything is a record until it is not	Manago, William M <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 09:55:44 -0400	48 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 10:12:49 -0400	36 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 10:51:26 -0400	27 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 10:48:11 -0500	44 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 09:11:05 -0700	20 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	bobd <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 09:19:36 -0700	86 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 10:27:50 -0600	43 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 10:36:00 -0600	48 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 13:31:36 -0400	85 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Manago, William M <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 13:35:28 -0400	109 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 13:42:36 -0400	34 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Manago, William M <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 13:48:33 -0400	31 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	RIMMAN <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 10:58:38 -0700	149 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 12:07:10 -0600	38 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 14:17:25 -0400	37 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Manago, William M <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 14:18:31 -0400	79 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 14:32:38 -0400	119 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Gordon Hoke <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 13:47:11 -0500	34 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Sanderson, Glen (Swift Technology) <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 20:02:08 +0100	18 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 13:11:28 -0600	48 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 16:03:39 -0400	44 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 16:15:44 -0400	40 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 13:14:28 -0700	37 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 13:17:33 -0700	36 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 16:24:26 -0400	55 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 15:05:50 -0600	73 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 14:07:08 -0700	24 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 14:20:21 -0700	64 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 13:46:22 -0700	39 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 15:34:25 -0700	44 lines
Re: Everything is a record until it is not	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 21:52:43 -0400	58 lines
Re: Everything is a record, now: Calendars	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 16:22:34 -0700	31 lines
FW: RE: Records and Information Technicians	Camarda, Amy <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 13:22:14 -0400	37 lines
Re: FW: RE: Records and Information Technicians	sasha babin <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 11:37:58 -0700	65 lines
Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 11:55:02 -0700	175 lines
Re: Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...	Allan, Liz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 14:34:03 -0500	281 lines
Re: Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 12:43:27 -0700	58 lines
Re: Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 16:10:53 -0400	35 lines
Re: Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...	Allan, Liz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 15:11:09 -0500	94 lines
Re: Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 13:20:38 -0700	363 lines
Re: Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 16:29:33 -0400	34 lines
Re: Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 14:49:06 -0700	37 lines
Introduction and Questions	Ward Fennell <[log in to unmask]>	Sat, 16 May 2009 14:01:03 -0500	49 lines
Re: Introduction and Questions	Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 May 2009 09:05:13 -0400	35 lines
Re: Introduction and Questions	Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 May 2009 07:48:32 -0700	39 lines
Re: Introduction and Questions	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 May 2009 08:28:55 -0700	95 lines
Re: Introduction and Questions	Pilar McAdam <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 May 2009 08:40:27 -0700	116 lines
Re: Introduction and Questions	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 May 2009 11:49:13 -0400	23 lines
Re: Introduction and Questions	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 May 2009 09:48:30 -0700	69 lines
Job opening - Records inventory project lead	Johnson Jr., Earl <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 May 2009 14:20:27 -0400	54 lines
JOB Posting US-CA-Santa Ana MGR Corporate Records CRM preferred	PeterK <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 09:34:52 -0400	61 lines
Re: JOB Posting US-CA-Santa Ana MGR Corporate Records CRM preferred	[log in to unmask]	Thu, 21 May 2009 13:55:59 +0000	23 lines
Migration from GroupWise to Outlook	Jennifer Winkler <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 16:38:40 -0700	36 lines
Missing Files (UNCLASSIFIED)	Tyler, Judy K Ms CIV USA MEDCOM CRDAMC <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 12:58:15 -0500	33 lines
Re: Missing Files (UNCLASSIFIED)	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 15:33:26 -0400	41 lines
Re: Missing Files (UNCLASSIFIED)	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 13:01:17 -0700	46 lines
Re: Missing Files (UNCLASSIFIED)	John Milligan <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 13:02:22 -0700	64 lines
Re: Missing Files (UNCLASSIFIED)	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 19:15:50 -0400	38 lines
OT-ing....Question on retention of software licenses	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 16:20:32 -0600	22 lines
Re: OT-ing....Question on retention of software licenses	Cooper, Dawn R. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 17:22:59 -0500	45 lines
Participate in Outsell's Information Management Benchmark Study!	Karen Wilson <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 15:11:08 -0500	74 lines
Re: Po-tay-to, Po-tah-toe; NOW: Context and cloud computing	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 10:45:11 -0700	58 lines
PowerPoint resources	Atle Skjekkeland <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 17 May 2009 10:05:57 -0400	29 lines
President's R&D Budget	Mark Conrad <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 16:12:12 -0400	51 lines
Question on retention of software licenses	Cooper, Dawn R. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 11:20:29 -0500	26 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 10:36:05 -0600	51 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 12:42:07 -0400	47 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 09:42:28 -0700	37 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 10:01:00 -0700	39 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 10:09:43 -0700	19 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 13:33:45 -0400	65 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 14:09:24 -0400	53 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 11:09:49 -0700	58 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Cooper, Dawn R. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 13:15:22 -0500	75 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 11:31:13 -0700	55 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 15:12:25 -0400	43 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 14:09:58 -0600	48 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Cooper, Dawn R. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 15:29:32 -0500	74 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 14:03:24 -0700	70 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 15:18:06 -0600	69 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	John Milligan <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 14:32:20 -0700	111 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Cooper, Dawn R. <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 16:33:36 -0500	100 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 15:47:06 -0600	35 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 15:05:44 -0700	102 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 15:15:15 -0700	44 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 18:01:28 -0700	61 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 21:15:59 -0400	34 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Mark Myers <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 06:15:01 -0700	133 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 07:33:02 -0600	46 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 09:59:25 -0400	41 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Mark Myers <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 07:24:52 -0700	72 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 08:45:07 -0700	76 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 11:13:14 -0400	36 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 08:13:35 -0700	24 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 11:20:47 -0400	36 lines
Re: Question on retention of software licenses	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 08:50:30 -0700	35 lines
RAIN Drop - Customer Information Files found in a dumpster	Starck, Brian <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 May 2009 16:48:53 -0600	36 lines
Re: RAIN Drop - Customer Information Files found in a dumpster	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 11:53:10 -0400	52 lines
Re: RAINdrip Update: Google accepts blame	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 09:37:09 -0400	39 lines
Re: RAINdrip Update: Google accepts blame	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 09:39:44 -0400	51 lines
RAINdrip: Public or Private Records?	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 17 May 2009 10:00:36 -0700	27 lines
Re: RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...	Allan, Liz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 09:50:04 -0500	35 lines
Re: RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...	Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 11:05:08 -0400	26 lines
Re: RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 11:19:32 -0400	49 lines
RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...	Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 12:38:48 -0400	92 lines
Re: RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 11:43:34 -0700	45 lines
RAINDrop - (c) 2009? Wishful Thinking, Perhaps, as Backlog Mounts	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 08:39:46 -0700	30 lines
RAINDrop - Dragging health records into the Digital Age - cnet news	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 14:58:09 -0400	31 lines
RAINDrop - IRS lax in destroying sensitive tax papers	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 09:24:13 -0700	28 lines
Re: RAINDrop - IRS lax in destroying sensitive tax papers	McLallen, David <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 11:36:00 -0600	28 lines
RAINDrop - Microsoft Expected to Show New Search Engine Next Week	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 15:54:07 -0700	23 lines
Re: RECMGMT-L Digest - 15 May 2009 to 16 May 2009 (#2009-132)	Su D. A. Graham <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 17 May 2009 00:08:35 -0600	126 lines
Records Relevant and Records Produced for Litigation After Release of Hold	Tom Wilson <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 16:17:34 -0500	70 lines
Re: Records Relevant and Records Produced for Litigation After Release of Hold	Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 14:17:38 -0700	111 lines
Re: Records Relevant and Records Produced for Litigation After Release of Hold	Furlow, Brad <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 15:34:20 -0600	131 lines
Re: Records Relevant and Records Produced for Litigation After Release of Hold	Julie Fleming <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 21:49:36 -0400	164 lines
Retention of IT license agreement.	sasha babin <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 19 May 2009 11:35:03 -0700	34 lines
Retention Period for 'Client Registers and Lists'	Nemchek, Lee <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 17:20:52 -0700	40 lines
Re: Retention Period for 'Client Registers and Lists'	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 17:33:09 -0700	77 lines
Re: Retention Period for 'Client Registers and Lists'	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 20:48:48 -0400	32 lines
Re: Retention Period for 'Client Registers and Lists'	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 20:15:36 -0500	35 lines
The value of a GSA Listing (Off topic)	Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 12:55:11 -0400	50 lines
Re: The value of a GSA Listing (Off topic)	Cooper, Dawn R. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 12:22:25 -0500	80 lines
Re: The value of a GSA Listing (Off topic)	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 13:41:04 -0400	35 lines
Re: The value of a GSA Listing (Off topic)	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 15 May 2009 14:31:31 -0400	40 lines
Re: The value of a GSA Listing (Off topic) (UNCLASSIFIED)	Tyler, Judy K Ms CIV USA MEDCOM CRDAMC <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 May 2009 07:50:26 -0500	37 lines
Traction Software	Tucker, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 20 May 2009 09:42:06 -0400	24 lines
Was: Everything is a record, now: Calendars	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 16:38:49 -0600	27 lines
Re: Was: Everything is a record, now: Calendars	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 16:25:22 -0700	46 lines
Re: Was: Everything is a record, now: Calendars	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 20:07:42 -0400	38 lines
Re: Was: Everything is a record, now: Calendars	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 18:27:48 -0600	27 lines
Re: Was: Everything is a record, now: Calendars	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 17:45:46 -0700	64 lines
Re: Was: Everything is a record, now: Calendars	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 21 May 2009 21:04:44 -0400	36 lines
Workshop on Preservation of Complex Engineering Data Presentations Available	Mark Conrad <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 18 May 2009 12:28:01 -0400	53 lines

Back to: Main RECMGMT-L Page

LISTS.UFL.EDU

RECMGMT-L Archives

May 2009, Week 3

Subject

From

Date

Size