LISTSERV 15.5 - RECMGMT-L Archives

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

RECMGMT-L Archives

June 2009, Week 2

Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Search Archives

Subject	From	Date	Size
Archivist/Records Analyst Job Opening	Startari, Judy <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:49:35 -0400	230 lines
ARMA Austin Chapter June Meeting	Karen Ullrich <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:05:59 -0500	99 lines
ARMA Vancouver Chapter Event - 2009 Annual General Meeting	Sandra Dunkin <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:13:41 -0700	87 lines
Re: ARMA Vancouver Chapter Event - 2009 Annual General Meeting	Linda Buss <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:34:40 +0000	40 lines
Re: ARMA Vancouver Chapter Event - 2009 Annual General Meeting	Sandra Dunkin <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:56:53 -0700	19 lines
Re: ARMA Vancouver Chapter Event - 2009 Annual General Meeting	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:58:16 -0400	31 lines
Closed Department?	Jennifer Budzek <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:46:49 -0400	23 lines
Re: Closed Department?	McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:03:32 -0500	45 lines
Delete vs. unaccessible	Alex Acevedo <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:56:40 -0400	32 lines
Re: Delete vs. unaccessible	[log in to unmask]	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:08:37 +0000	20 lines
Re: Delete vs. unaccessible	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:28:09 -0400	72 lines
Re: Delete vs. unaccessible	Linda Buss <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:40:24 +0000	54 lines
Re: Delete vs. unaccessible	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:49:51 -0600	56 lines
Re: Delete vs. unaccessible	Don Lueders <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:37:47 -0400	70 lines
Re: Delete vs. unaccessible	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:25:48 -0600	68 lines
Re: Delete vs. unaccessible	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:34:36 -0400	32 lines
Re: Delete vs. unaccessible	Graves, Mark <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:18:31 -0500	25 lines
Re: Does Glaxo have a records manager for Quebec?	Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:05:43 -0400	32 lines
Electronic File & Folder naming conventions	Mullen, James L (SN) <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:39:36 -0500	37 lines
Re: Email Management Questions	Nolene Sherman <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:44:13 -0700	61 lines
F/IQ Call for Papers - The Conference Issue	Erin Kent <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:56:14 -0400	77 lines
Fifteen Recommendations to Better Guarantee the Right to Privacy in the Digital Age	Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 16:33:22 -0400	86 lines
Fwd: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	Bill Benedon <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:09:58 EDT	99 lines
Re: Fwd: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	Steve Petersen <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:38:37 -0500	21 lines
Fwd: [PhotoHistory] Stanford to shutdown CoOL and Conservation Distlist	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:08:26 -0400	137 lines
Re: Fwd: [PhotoHistory] Stanford to shutdown CoOL and Conservation Distlist	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 06:01:32 -0700	114 lines
Fwd: [RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK] FW: JISC infoNet announce the launch of a new RM survey	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:39:43 -0400	165 lines
Halliburton Email Presentation Vegas	Zengel, Rikki <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 09:05:05 -0400	33 lines
Re: How to gain support for RM	Linda Buss <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 16:22:04 +0000	32 lines
Re: How to gain support for RM	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:56:02 -0400	51 lines
Re: How to gain support for RM	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 13:42:27 -0400	43 lines
ICRM Certification Maintenance Credits	CWEISE <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:14:30 -0400	66 lines
Re: ICRM Certification Maintenance Credits	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:43:55 -0400	36 lines
Re: JOB Posting US-CA-Santa Ana MGR Corporate Records CRM preferred	Nolene Sherman <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:26:35 -0700	49 lines
Re: JOB Posting US-CA-Santa Ana MGR Corporate Records CRM preferred	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:01:22 -0400	35 lines
Re: JOB Posting US-CA-Santa Ana MGR Corporate Records CRM preferred	Pilar McAdam <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 08:40:00 -0700	48 lines
Re: JOB Posting US-CA-Santa Ana MGR Corporate Records CRM preferred	Nolene Sherman <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:17:40 -0700	77 lines
Job Posting US-IL-Chicago Director of Records Management CRM required	PeterK <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:43:04 -0400	33 lines
Looking for Mark Weaver in the UK	Teresa Werner <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 16:33:47 -0700	18 lines
Re: Mainframe Computer Service (Problems)	Nolene Sherman <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:10:19 -0700	28 lines
Re: More 5 words only	Jon Quandt <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:54:12 -0400	26 lines
OT - Happy Birthday to the U.S. Army	Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:04:08 -0700	24 lines
Re: OT - Happy Birthday to the U.S. Army	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:59:48 -0700	42 lines
Re: OT - Happy Birthday to the U.S. Army	Mattson, Donald J <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:35:00 -0500	44 lines
Re: OT - Happy Birthday to the U.S. Army	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:50:18 -0700	64 lines
Re: OT - Happy Birthday to the U.S. Army (UNCLASSIFIED)	Tyler, Judy K Ms CIV USA MEDCOM CRDAMC <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:05:39 -0500	61 lines
OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	Lorinda Kasten-Lowerre <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:52:13 -0700	23 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	Hilliard, Mary <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:18:59 -0500	24 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	J. Michael Pemberton <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:50:33 -0400	51 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:01:25 -0700	26 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:14:21 -0600	25 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:16:48 -0600	24 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	Aiken, Chris <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:31:56 -0400	25 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	Cheryl L. Rose <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:34:57 -0400	21 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	Angel Ramos <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:31:55 -0400	18 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:17:06 -0400	22 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	Furlow, Brad <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:09:33 -0600	75 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	Cooper, Dawn R. <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:39:53 -0500	97 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:51:53 -0700	34 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?	Mullen, James L (SN) <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:51:57 -0500	32 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?--RIM 5 words	Susan Beamer <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:49:25 -0700	15 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?--RIM 5 words	Sharon Blackstock <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:55:29 -0600	42 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?--RIM 5 words	Hilliard, Mary <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:24:45 -0500	18 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?--RIM 5 words	RIMMAN <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:41:08 -0700	24 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?--RIM 5 words	John Milligan <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:56:17 -0700	55 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?--RIM 5 words	Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:51:50 -0400	37 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?--RIM 5 words	Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:58:47 -0400	42 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?--RIM 5 words	Sanderson, Glen (Swift Technology) <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:30:51 +0100	63 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?--RIM 5 words	Wilson, Jeffery <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:43:01 -0400	37 lines
Re: OT: Five Words Only, or No More Than Five Words?--RIM 5 words	McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:11:44 -0500	43 lines
OT: More 5 words only	Debbie Wolf <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:10:30 -0400	40 lines
OT: More 5 words only	Debbie Wolf <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:10:30 -0400	45 lines
Re: OT: More 5 words only	Susan Fitch Brown <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:16:45 -0400	20 lines
OT: More 5 words only	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:22:15 -0400	21 lines
Outsell Benchmark Survey - Date Extended to June 14 - Please Participate!	Karen Wilson <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:08:39 -0500	110 lines
RAIN 20090522 Clinton records lost, Madison Co Fire, Firelock, Information Malpractice, UK eDiscovery	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:41:52 -0400	378 lines
RAIN 20090524 eMail Backup, Obit, Building records, Corporate Espionage	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:06:26 -0400	130 lines
RAIN 20090526 NHS Files lost, RAF files Lost, ODU archivist, Stasi files	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:18:17 -0400	184 lines
RAIN 20090528 $37Million Awarded, Wilson Selected, Yeltsin Library, Court Docs Online	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Sun, 14 Jun 2009 21:30:26 -0400	279 lines
RAINdrip: Sharepoint not a magic bullet (a BIG surprise!)	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:13:24 -0400	31 lines
Re: RAINdrip: Sharepoint not a magic bullet (a BIG surprise!)	Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:43:21 -0700	30 lines
Re: RAINdrip: WSJ Article on Health Record Transition	Chris Muller <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:00:42 -0400	29 lines
Re: RAINdrip: WSJ Article on Health Record Transition	Jon Harnett <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:03:38 -0400	46 lines
RAINDrop - washingtonpost.com - Online Files Scrubbed After Museum Shooting	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:19:29 -0400	30 lines
RAINdrop Global IT Security Survey Finds Insider Snooping on the Rise	PeterK <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:29:16 -0400	27 lines
Records Management at Employee Departure	Shariful Islam <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:54:14 -0400	45 lines
Re: Records Management at Employee Departure	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:07:09 -0400	33 lines
Re: Records Management at Employee Departure	Stephen Cohen <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:47:04 -0400	29 lines
Re: Records Management at Employee Departure	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:30:57 -0400	57 lines
Re: Records Management at Employee Departure	Tom Wilson <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:29:28 -0500	78 lines
Re: Records Management at Employee Departure	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:14:55 -0400	34 lines
Records Management Department	Abdul Rahman Mohd <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:16:17 -0400	32 lines
Re: Records Management Department	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:39:34 -0400	73 lines
Re: Records Management Department	Sanderson, Glen (Swift Technology) <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:58:59 +0100	92 lines
records management in five words	Dean Bundy <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:00:03 -0400	18 lines
Records Management- Whose Job is it Anyway??	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 12:56:11 -0400	93 lines
Re: Records Management- Whose Job is it Anyway??	John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:14:31 -0400	32 lines
Re: Records Management- Whose Job is it Anyway??	Manago, William M <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:10:20 -0400	31 lines
Re: Records Management- Whose Job is it Anyway??	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:07:29 -0400	78 lines
Records Manager in New York	Hurd, Daniel <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:50:44 -0400	60 lines
SharePoint & Semantic Web events	Jean Graef <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:35:05 -0700	38 lines
Re: Skills Needed for an ERMS Project	Cheng, Jason <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:03:01 -0700	76 lines
Re: Skills Needed for an ERMS Project	Bergeron, Paul <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:05:56 -0400	147 lines
Survey on education for sustainable development	Luis Gutierrez <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:04:31 -0400	40 lines
text messages	mckinney, susan <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:43:05 -0500	43 lines
Re: text messages	Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:48:33 -0400	55 lines
Re: text messages	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 12:06:32 -0400	54 lines
Twitter - OT	Nolene Sherman <[log in to unmask]>	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:39:11 -0700	23 lines
Re: Twitter - OT	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:31:59 -0500	40 lines
Re: Twitter - OT	RIMMAN <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:41:18 -0700	49 lines
Re: Twitter - OT	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 12:53:07 -0400	31 lines
Re: Twitter - OT	Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:58:30 -0600	31 lines
Re: Twitter - OT	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:01:52 -0400	32 lines
Re: Twitter - OT	Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:05:20 -0400	33 lines
Re: Twitter - OT	Isaacs, Leigh <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:00:04 -0400	99 lines
Re: Twitter - OT	Warner, Kevan <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:14:21 -0600	22 lines
Re: Twitter - OT	Julie Colgan <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:52:32 -0400	44 lines
Re: Twitter - OT	Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:07:03 -0500	20 lines
Re: Twitter - OT	Ralph Better <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:12:17 -0500	44 lines
Re: Twitter - OT	Nolene Sherman <[log in to unmask]>	Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:32:46 -0700	34 lines
Re: Twitter - OT	Hilliard, Mary <[log in to unmask]>	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:55:21 -0500	33 lines
Re: Twitter - OT	Kelly_Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>	Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:59:05 -0400	32 lines
WAS OT: Five Words NOW: Are we done?	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:37:19 -0400	31 lines
Re: WAS OT: Five Words NOW: Are we done?	John Milligan <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:38:13 -0700	50 lines
Re: WAS OT: Five Words NOW: Are we done?	Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:09:20 -0700	26 lines
Re: WAS OT: Five Words NOW: Are we done?	John Milligan <[log in to unmask]>	Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:12:08 -0700	48 lines

Back to: Main RECMGMT-L Page

LISTS.UFL.EDU

RECMGMT-L Archives

June 2009, Week 2

Subject

From

Date

Size