LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for RECMGMT-L Archives


RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject: Re: Knowledge Management
From: Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Wed, 28 Jun 2000 08:48:03 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain (44 lines)


Amen to that John.  And neither does a rewrapped, mediocre EDMS system make a "knowledge mgmt. system", as purported by numerous vendors.  Notice I said "vendor", and not "service partner."

Vendors can create a lot of smoke and vapor..., and many RIM folks have proven to be very gullible.

Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
[log in to unmask]


>>> [log in to unmask] 06/28/00 07:17AM >>>
Robert Bailey's post peeked my interest - looking forward to seeing list responses.  In the mean time, given the very creative definitions extant for knowledge management, I'd appreciate hearing where he and others draw the line. My own firmly held belief is that technology does not knowledge management make (though it sure can help). My approach to work in knowledge resource management is founded in:

-- the principles of RIM with which most are familiar;
-- "whole systems analysis" to ensure effective integration of recommended solutions;
-- action research to provoke meaningful participation of stakeholders in solution design;
-- appropriate technology selection(s) to ensure that technology is a support for, not a driver of systems; and
-- strategic cultural change/learning community development to ensure that information itself is valued for decision making, accountability and planning.

This last point is fundamental, seen as a "given" to the extent that it is really so much lip service in many organizations. You can't have knowledge without the valuing of information as the field from which knowledge is drawn. And, information isn't valued if the RIM story isn't a good one, people are cavalier about recording, hidden systems, etc.

How do others see it?

Regards,
John

____________________________________________________
John J. O'Brien, CRM, MLT
ISI Global - Coach & Principal Consultant
www.crosswinds.net/~isi

Interactive Strategies, Inc.
Aligning Vision, Process & Outcomes
Organizational Knowledge Systems Design & Audit
Professional Development Education & Executive Coaching

Regent, Certification Maintenance Program
Board of Regents, Institute of Certified Records Managers (ICRM)

Voice/fax: 1-250-388-7791     ICQ #23282396 "ISIGlobal"
email: Please reply to  [log in to unmask]  for a timely response.

<snip>
  Earlier this year I asked this same question [with] minor response.  Maybe we can do better this time.
  I am attempting to identify city, county, state or federal organizations that are attempting or have completed some phase of  or completed a Knowledge Management System.  Anyone that know of such activities and/or a contact to find out more details, please contact me.

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main RECMGMT-L Page

Permalink



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager