LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for RECMGMT-L Archives


RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject: Re: box size and weight
From: Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Tue, 1 May 2001 08:54:12 +1000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain (24 lines)


________________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail is solely for the use of the intended recipient and may contain
information which is confidential or privileged.  Unauthorised use of its
contents is prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please
notify the sender immediately via return e-mail and then delete the original
e-mail.
________________________________________________________________________________

Peter K wrote:

"All in all it is better to use the "one-cube" box with double-wall
construction. It is easier to lift and easier to calculate storage."

And all the storage companies here in Australia charge significantly more for
storage and handling of "non-standard" boxes, so your budget gets full of holes
very quickly.

Regards

Glenn
my own views, not those of any present or former clients or employers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main RECMGMT-L Page

Permalink



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager