I checked the page, and couldn't find the study.

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of John Ranck
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 8:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: National Park Service case study


Several people have asked me about the NPS study, handwritten notes for
which indicated it's 16x more expensive to maintian a digital archive as
compared to paper. The case study was done by Diane Vogt-O'Connor at the
NPS. Whether she's still there or not, I don't know. The NPS contact info
is http://www.nps.gov/goga/pphtml/contact.html.


Jerry VanLoozen <[log in to unmask]> (a reader of this list) has
prepared 'The Dark Side of Document Imaging: The Hidden Cost of Capture'
(I am in no way associated with him, so this is not a sales plug, he just
let me know about it & I'm passing it along) if you're interested in a
more recent info link.

HTH.

JR

John Ranck
[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance