From: Carol Knowles [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Subject: Re: [evol-psych] Preprint: The unified theory of repression
Hi Psyarters
The paper indicates that Anna Freud caused confusions by claiming repression
was unconscious, and suppression was the conscious way of defending against
it. Is anyone able to tell me if this related to the way ego psychologists
work and how this is related to the arguments of those such as Lacan who
problematize the way the ego psychologists work?
The quote I refer to above follows - it is on pg 3 of the article.
"The article is organized into four sections. First, in a historical
analysis, I try to show that the classic conception of repression, from
Herbart to Freud, is consistent with modern laboratory research, but that
confusion has resulted from a semantic distortion introduced, ironically, by
Anna Freud, who insisted that repression needed to be an unconscious
process, its conscious counterpart being suppression. Sigmund Freud,
actually, used repression and suppression interchangeably and insisted on
the unity of mental life across the conscious-unconscious continuum, so that
repression could be
both conscious and unconscious".
Carol.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Murray Schwartz" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 1:18 AM
Subject: FW: [evol-psych] Preprint: The unified theory of repression
From: William Benzon [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Subject: FW: [evol-psych] Preprint: The unified theory of repression
You can download the full text of this paper at the URL indicated at the
end. It is going to be published in Brain and Behavioral Science.
------ Forwarded Message
From: Robert Karl Stonjek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Robert Karl Stonjek <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:53:33
To: Mind and Brain <[log in to unmask]>, Evolutionary-Psychology
<[log in to unmask]>, Cognitive NeuroScience
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [evol-psych] Preprint: The unified theory of repression
TITLE: The unified theory of repression
AUTHOR: Matthew Hugh Erdelyi
ABSTRACT:
Repression has become an empirical fact that is at once obvious and
problematic. Fragmented clinical and laboratory traditions and disputed
terminology have resulted in a Babel of misunderstandings in which false
distinctions are imposed (e.g., between repression and suppression) and
necessary distinctions not drawn (e.g., between the mechanism and the use to
which it is put, defense being just one). "Repression" was introduced by
Herbart to designate the (nondefensive) inhibition of ideas by other ideas
in their struggle for consciousness. Freud adapted repression to the
defensive inhibition of "unbearable" mental contents. Substantial
experimental literatures on attentional biases, thought avoidance,
interference, and intentional forgetting exist, the oldest prototype being
the work of Ebbinghaus, who showed that intentional avoidance of memories
results in their progressive forgetting over time. It has now become clear,
as clinicians had claimed, that the inaccessible materials are often
available and emerge indirectly (e.g., procedurally, implicitly). It is also
now established that the Ebbinghaus retention function can be partly
reversed, with resulting increases of conscious memory over time
(hypermnesia). Freud's clinical experience revealed early on that exclusion
from consciousness was effected not just by simple repression (inhibition)
but also by a variety of distorting techniques, some deployed to degrade
latent contents (denial), all eventually subsumed under the rubric of
defense mechanisms ("repression in the widest sense"). Freudian and
Bartlettian distortions are essentially the same, even in name, but for
motive (cognitive vs. emotional), and experimentally induced false memories
and other "memory illusions" are laboratory analogs of self-induced
distortions.
KEYWORDS: Avoidance, Bartlett, Defense, Denial, Distortion, Ebbinghaus,
False-Memories, Freud, Inhibition, Repression, Suppression.
FULL TEXT BBS: http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Erdelyi-04022004/Referees/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/evolutionary-psychology/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[log in to unmask]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------ End of Forwarded Message
|