LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for RECMGMT-L Archives


RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives


View:

Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font

Options:

Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives


Subject: Re: Reviewing & Approving Retention Schedule
From: "White, Bruce" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:29:01 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain (26 lines)


Peter Kurilecz said:
>The key word is INDEPENDENT. That is why IA will not help in the
>development of something because they will lose their independence and
>objectivity when it comes time to test whatever is in development.

I have to agree with my friend Peter (well, I think he still is) on the role
of auditors in the review process.  We have a steering committee made up of
Legal, Finance, and other offices that have a direct interest in the
schedule; Audit is not one of the members but serves in an advisory role, as
needed.  

Like our records policies, we might ask their opinion on certain aspects of
retention but they have no say in the final schedule.  This allows them to
maintain their independence.  We create the policy (in this case the
schedule) and they audit against it.  

Bruce L. White, CRM, PMP
San Diego, CA
TEL: 619-696-4671
FAX: 619-696-2534
CELL: 619-952-7145
 


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main RECMGMT-L Page

Permalink



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager