Content-Type: text/html

Has there been any documented instances where the varying appearance of a
web site or document from different browsers led to a substantive fiscal,
legal, or policy issue? Or was it the informational content of the site that
was the issue? What is the value of the "moving banner" in most business
applications? Is this something that is "nice" or "necessary"?

What should our policy be in maintaining documentation that may generally be
in the form of an external (very dynamic) web site "publication" not
addressed specifically to our organization (for example, Peter's RAIN
linkages)? We need to be careful about extending our circle of
responsibility too far beyond our circle of authority - a common RM problem.


Internally, shouldn't we maintain documentation at it's source in most
circumstances? This would seem to simplify the issue somewhat.

Not trying to denigrate the issues raised. Just trying to better
understand/define the problem.

Dwight Wallis, CRM
Multnomah County Records
2505 SE 11th Avenue
Portland, OR 97202
ph: (503)988-3741
<a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind0004%26L%3DRECMGMT-L%26E%3D0%26P%3D832707%26B%3D--%26T%3Dtext%252Fplain%3B%2520charset%3Diso-8859-1" >[log in to unmask]</a>
<mailto:<a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind0004%26L%3DRECMGMT-L%26E%3D0%26P%3D832707%26B%3D--%26T%3Dtext%252Fplain%3B%2520charset%3Diso-8859-1" >[log in to unmask]</a>>