Content-Type: text/html On Jun 30, 2006, at 12:00 AM, RECMGMT-L automatic digest system wrote: > Subject: Re: Is FM200 Fire Suppression System safe for people? > > On 6/28/06, Mohd Azman Bin Kamarolzaman <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> I'm sorry if this topic has been discussed before. However, I'd >> appreciate >> if someone can direct me for an answer to this. >> I've been referring to websites wrt FM200 and found nothing that says >> it >> is not safe for people. > > Generally speaking, YES FM200 is quite safe, but another compound you > may > want to consider is NOVEC 1230 I agree with Larry, check into NOVEC by 3M. the problem with FM-200 and similar agents are they are pronounced safe at 7%. But this same agent presents problems at 14%. Now if your file room is fine on day one and the aisles are clear and the concentration is 7% with that volume of records. is that a static position? NO! Four years from now every nook and cranny is filled, the tops of the shelves near the lights are jammed and guess what? The concentration is higher than 7% and now we have concerns. But what's a little cardiac sensitivity among records managers. NOVEC is rated "No Observable Adverse Effects Level (NOAEL) and that is what we like to see in our vaults. Plus it will not effect the written document, does not conduct electricity (no shorting out of PC's, Servers, etc.) and works by evaporating rather than by pure chemical suppression. It is safe for historic documents and artifacts. Plus it is only minutely more expensive than less safe suppressants. Hugh Smith FIRELOCK Fireproof Modular Vaults [log in to unmask] (610) 756-4440 Fax (610) 756-4134 WWW.FIRELOCK.COM List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance