LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for RECMGMT-L Archives


RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives


May 2004


Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Search Archives


Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re: "life-cycle"

Grevin, Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 16:35:53 -0400

61 lines

<No subject>

Grahame Gould <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 10:34:55 +0800

71 lines

<No subject>

Doreene Kealohanui <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 07:14:24 -0700

80 lines

A funny thing happened on the way to Long Beach...

Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 09:41:16 -0700

34 lines

Re: A funny thing happened on the way to Long Beach...

Calla Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 11:04:41 -0600

57 lines

Re: A funny thing happened on the way to Long Beach...

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 10:18:20 -0700

21 lines

Re: A funny thing happened on the way to Long Beach...

bobd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 10:40:04 -0700

49 lines

Re: A funny thing happened on the way to Long Beach...

Steinke, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 12:49:03 -0500

48 lines

Access To Records - MFIPPA Fees

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 14:17:38 -0400

32 lines

ADMIN was Re: UNSUB [log in to unmask]

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2004 11:42:56 -0400

49 lines

Alberta Privacy Legislation and Federal Privacy in Canada on Sill IMages collection

Snudden, Bonnie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 08:47:27 -0600

23 lines

Alex Acevedo/TheGuardian is out of the office.

Alex Acevedo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2004 00:25:13 -0400

16 lines

Re: Alphabetizing Last Names

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 21 May 2004 09:00:03 -0700

32 lines

Alternatives to Retaining Paper Files

Belrose, Sharon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 09:27:00 -0400

47 lines

Analysis of postings to RECMGMT-L

Frank White <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 09:40:46 -0400

89 lines

Anyone addressed RM with EPIC?

Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 13:10:13 -0700

27 lines

Apologies

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 14:02:28 -0400

26 lines

Archives and Privacy

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 09:11:10 -0700

33 lines

Re: Archives and Privacy

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 12:00:17 -0500

36 lines

Re: Archives and Privacy

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 13:07:39 -0400

89 lines

Re: Archives and Privacy

Julianna Trivers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 14:42:53 -0400

43 lines

Archives or records management for six city governments

Jacqueline Haun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2004 13:46:07 -0400

52 lines

Re: Archives or records management for six city governments

Sullivan, Melody <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2004 14:12:41 -0600

74 lines

Re: Archives or records management for six city governments

Jacqueline Haun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 09:36:16 -0400

30 lines

ARMA 2005

Rosemary Hayes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 10:29:38 -0400

25 lines

Re: ARMA 2005

Alice Young <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 10:34:34 -0400

50 lines

Re: ARMA 2005

Smeekens, Sharon (Contractor) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 09:38:59 -0500

45 lines

Re: ARMA 2005

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 07:50:05 -0700

50 lines

Re: ARMA 2005

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 07:54:39 -0700

18 lines

Re: ARMA 2005

Alfaro, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 10:58:11 -0400

29 lines

Re: ARMA 2005

Tracey Black <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 11:04:53 -0400

51 lines

Re: ARMA 2005

Alice Young <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 11:06:28 -0400

65 lines

Re: ARMA 2005

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 09:20:02 -0700

74 lines

Re: ARMA 2005

Rosemary Hayes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 07:48:22 -0400

26 lines

ARMA Detroit June meeting - How do you learn an organization: Records Retention Program for the Michigan

jphibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 11:53:08 -0400

67 lines

ARMA Gaith May Meeting - Dr. Ken Megill - Corporate Memory and RIM - 5/12/04

John Milligan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2004 15:40:35 +0000

81 lines

ARMA Gaith May Meeting - Dr. Ken Megill - Corporate Memory and RIM - 5/12/04

John Milligan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2004 15:41:56 +0000

81 lines

ARMA Gaithersburg June 10 Banquet - "Classic Records"

John Milligan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2004 17:16:48 +0000

80 lines

ARMA Silicon Valley Chapter Meeting

Christopher Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 09:07:30 -0700

65 lines

Article on care and handling of DVD's

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2004 08:22:20 +1000

38 lines

Articles Requested

Tom Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 10:46:52 -0400

51 lines

Re: Articles Requested

Robin Porter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 11:32:26 -0400

90 lines

Re: Articles Requested

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 11:46:45 -0400

23 lines

Re: Articles Requested

Tom Adams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 13:26:04 -0400

45 lines

Re: Articles Requested

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 14:01:00 -0400

25 lines

Cathy Danahy/SOS/NEBRLN is out of the office.

Cathy Danahy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 01:00:29 -0500

15 lines

Changing email address

Naus, Rainer E <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 10:09:33 -0400

23 lines

Re: Changing email address

Grevin, Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 10:44:54 -0400

57 lines

Checklist for microfilm/imaging candidates?

Johnson, Earl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 09:51:03 -0400

54 lines

Re: Checklist for microfilm/imaging candidates?

Calla Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 08:07:19 -0600

72 lines

Re: Checklist for microfilm/imaging candidates?

Johnson, Earl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 10:11:17 -0400

34 lines

Re: Checklist for microfilm/imaging candidates?

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 07:49:37 +1000

32 lines

Re: Checklist for microfilm/imaging candidates?

Mary B. Hayden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 09:13:10 -0500

82 lines

Re: College and Universities

Robin Porter <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 20:27:12 -0400

28 lines

Computer Skills vs RE: MS Word Properties - Summary Box

John Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 17:40:58 -0400

99 lines

Re: Congratulations Houston!

Peden, John <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 12:51:35 -0400

45 lines

Converting Files to CD

Belrose, Sharon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 09:15:20 -0400

54 lines

Re: Converting Files to CD

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 09:42:21 -0400

23 lines

Re: Converting Files to CD

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 09:58:40 -0400

44 lines

Re: Converting Files to CD

Mary B. Hayden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 10:04:27 -0500

92 lines

Re: Converting Files to CD

Patrick Powers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 10:41:39 -0400

60 lines

Re: converting files to CD

Patrick Powers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 11:19:20 -0400

17 lines

Re: Converting Files to CD

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 11:20:41 -0400

27 lines

Re: converting files to CD

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 11:27:04 -0400

33 lines

Re: converting files to CD

Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 11:53:30 -0400

46 lines

Re: Converting Files to CD

Childress, Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 13:35:50 -0400

114 lines

Re: converting files to CD

Frank White <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 16:37:20 -0400

47 lines

Darwin Braincore users

David Read <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 May 2004 15:13:16 -0700

36 lines

Define Implementation

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 14:43:21 -0400

25 lines

Re: Define Implementation

Gerry Clifford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 14:52:04 EDT

21 lines

Re: Define Implementation

John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 16:28:44 -0400

23 lines

Re: Define Implementation

Peter W. Shewchenko <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 16:48:28 -0400

37 lines

Re: Define Implementation

Lawrence Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 15:14:45 -0700

37 lines

Re: Define Implementation

Alan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 18:26:19 -0400

39 lines

Re: Define Implementation

Debbie Sharpe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 May 2004 10:18:54 -0300

56 lines

Re: Define Implementation

Alan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 08:25:50 -0400

44 lines

Define Implementation

Alan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 08:46:47 -0400

19 lines

Re: Define Implementation

Smith, Richard E <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 09:04:12 -0500

64 lines

Re: Define Implementation

Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 08:41:01 -0700

54 lines

Re: Define Implementation

A.S.E. Fairfax <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 14:22:10 -0700

76 lines

Re: Define Implementation

Grahame Gould <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 08:33:04 +0800

57 lines

Re: Define Implementation

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 07:09:23 -0400

53 lines

Re: Define Implementation

Childress, Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 08:27:57 -0400

70 lines

Re: Define Implementation

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 08:56:36 -0400

49 lines

Digital secrets

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 14:49:35 -0400

24 lines

Re: Digital secrets

Hilliard, Mary <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 12:07:44 -0500

62 lines

Dilbert strip for today

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 07:12:25 -0400

21 lines

Re: Dilbert strip for today

Rich Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 08:34:29 -0600

25 lines

Re: Dilbert strip for today

bobd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 07:56:07 -0700

39 lines

Disasterand Business Recovery, & Crisis Management, June 3/04,AIIM Toronto June Program

Lederman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 23:15:25 -0400

90 lines

Re: Document Management: Contracts

Patricia Barrett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 May 2004 13:27:47 -0400

51 lines

Re: Document Management: Contracts

Sharon Blackstock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 08:45:27 -0600

28 lines

Re: Document Management: Contracts

Sharon Blackstock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 08:54:59 -0600

29 lines

Re: Document Management: Contracts

Alexander Fazekas-Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 08:53:39 -0700

46 lines

Re: Document Management: Contracts

Tina Clayton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 10:27:17 -0600

67 lines

DOD 5015.2 certification list

Jim Mullen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 15:43:00 -0700

32 lines

Re: DOD 5015.2 certification list

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 09:10:56 +1000

37 lines

Re: DOD 5015.2 certification list

Childress, Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 09:40:44 -0400

48 lines

Re: DOD 5015.2 certification list

Love, Tom (NIP) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 09:53:54 -0400

69 lines

Re: DOD 5015.2 certification list

Jim Mullen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 10:03:23 -0700

51 lines

Duplication of County Microfilm

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 13:17:04 -0700

40 lines

Re: Duplication of County Microfilm

Sharon Blackstock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 14:50:32 -0600

22 lines

Re: Duplication of County Microfilm

A.S.E. Fairfax <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 14:12:44 -0700

73 lines

Re: Duplication of County Microfilm

Tim Barnard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 16:15:27 -0500

83 lines

Re: Duplication of County Microfilm

Benay Berl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 14:18:08 -0700

68 lines

Re: Duplication of County Microfilm

Bridgette Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 17:24:44 -0400

48 lines

Re: Duplication of County Microfilm

Gerri Bradford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 16:01:32 -0600

63 lines

Re: Duplication of County Microfilm

Randal Chaisson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 15:09:46 -0700

125 lines

Re: Duplication of County Microfilm

Gerri Bradford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 16:26:48 -0600

155 lines

Re: Duplication of County Microfilm

A.S.E. Fairfax <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 16:02:20 -0700

140 lines

Re: Duplication of County Microfilm

bobd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 17:00:02 -0700

173 lines

Re: Duplication of County Microfilm

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 08:30:09 -0400

46 lines

Re: Duplication of County Microfilm

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 08:15:52 -0500

25 lines

Re: Duplication of County Microfilm

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 08:22:40 -0700

51 lines

Duplication of County Microfilm

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 13:09:53 -0700

19 lines

Re: Duplication of County Microfilm

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 09:10:12 -0700

47 lines

E-Mail limits - survey results and strategy

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 14:16:36 +1000

64 lines

E-Mail Strategy

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 15:31:42 -0700

29 lines

Re: E-Mail Strategy

Steve MacWilliams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 16:01:34 -0700

94 lines

Re: E-Mail Strategy

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 06:40:34 -0400

37 lines

Re: E-Mail Strategy

Richard G. King Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 08:38:00 -0700

22 lines

EDMS - Hummingbird DOCS Corporate

Patti Kraatz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 12:28:58 -0400

38 lines

ethics statement

Kristina Gray Perez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 09:02:58 -0700

32 lines

Re: ethics statement

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 12:24:28 -0400

58 lines

Re: ethics statement

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 09:24:24 -0700

23 lines

Re: ethics statement

jphibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 12:25:48 -0400

28 lines

Re: ethics statement

Kristina Gray Perez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 09:40:42 -0700

51 lines

Re: ethics statement

Mike Pemberton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 15:11:08 -0400

71 lines

Evaluation of the Canadian Archival Information Network (CAIN)

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 09:14:46 -0400

33 lines

FANTASTIC!!!!: 13th Annual Heartland ARMA Seminar Columbia, Missouri

recmgmt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 15:13:36 -1000

98 lines

Filenet and SAP

David Singley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2004 12:28:03 -0400

25 lines

FileNet Records Manager

Emilie Himm <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 14:30:41 -0400

29 lines

Follow Up to CD question

Belrose, Sharon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 11:02:42 -0400

51 lines

Re: Follow Up to CD question

Gary L. Grieme <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 10:44:38 -0500

85 lines

Re: Follow Up to CD question

Belrose, Sharon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 11:50:08 -0400

98 lines

Re: Follow Up to CD question

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 12:19:12 -0400

21 lines

Re: Follow Up to CD question

Gary L. Grieme <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 11:24:04 -0500

48 lines

Re: Follow Up to CD question

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 12:29:12 -0400

27 lines

Re: Follow Up to CD question

Belrose, Sharon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 12:27:24 -0400

34 lines

Re: Follow Up to CD question

Belrose, Sharon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 12:37:43 -0400

40 lines

Re: Follow Up to CD question

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 09:59:45 -0700

64 lines

Re: Follow Up to CD question

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 13:11:53 -0400

37 lines

Re: Follow Up to CD question

Snudden, Bonnie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 12:02:53 -0600

87 lines

Forrester Report

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 14 May 2004 19:03:07 EDT

19 lines

friday fun "life-cycle"

Chuck Piotrowski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 12:37:35 -0700

130 lines

Re: friday fun "life-cycle"

John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 16:05:49 -0400

25 lines

Re: friday fun "life-cycle"

Mike Segers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 17:54:16 -0500

43 lines

Friday Funny

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 13:27:28 EDT

16 lines

Friday Musing

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 10:13:10 -0400

33 lines

FW: Outlook "Out of Office" messages

Tracey Black <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 10:58:05 -0400

41 lines

FW: Re: Follow Up to CD question

Snudden, Bonnie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2004 15:21:55 -0600

22 lines

Good book on records management in a Small Business?

Rich Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 15:15:49 -0600

31 lines

Re: Good book on records management in a Small Business?

Train, TK <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 15:32:06 -0600

59 lines

Re: Good book on records management in a Small Business?

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 07:38:37 +1000

34 lines

Re: Good book on records management in a Small Business?

Rich Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 15:49:53 -0600

55 lines

Re: Good book on records management in a Small Business?

Brown, Marisa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 16:27:52 -0700

44 lines

Re: Good book on records management in a Small Business?

Edwin M. Hopkins, Records Management Support <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 19:27:19 -0700

45 lines

Re: How to control disposition when retention is "indefinite"??

Lawrence Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2004 17:41:44 -0700

95 lines

Re: How to control disposition when retention is "indefinite"??

Brent D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 09:21:43 -0700

167 lines

Re: How to control disposition when retention is "indefinite"??

Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 10:22:41 -0700

67 lines

Re: How to control disposition when retention is "indefinite"??

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 13:33:52 -0400

58 lines

Re: How to control disposition when retention is "indefinite"??

bobd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 10:57:44 -0700

34 lines

Re: How to control disposition when retention is "indefinite"??

Scott, Paul (FPM) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 13:26:24 -0500

19 lines

Re: How to control disposition when retention is "indefinite"??

Alice Young <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 14:28:07 -0400

45 lines

Re: How to control disposition when retention is "indefinite"??

bobd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 11:59:23 -0700

37 lines

Re: Imaging

Alfaro, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 15:35:20 -0400

69 lines

Re: Imaging

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 14:39:11 -0500

81 lines

Re: Imaging

McIntyre, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 15:45:36 -0400

96 lines

Re: Imaging

Alfaro, Vladimir <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 16:04:30 -0400

154 lines

IMRC Newsletter (May 2004)

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 10:36:43 -0400

35 lines

Re: inexpensive records management software

Gerri Bradford <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 11:24:46 -0600

38 lines

Re: inexpensive records management software

Frank White <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 16:12:23 -0400

80 lines

Information Mgmt and Records Mgmt

Lorrin Read, CRM <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2004 10:37:02 -0400

31 lines

Re: Information Mgmt and Records Mgmt

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2004 10:55:08 -0400

81 lines

Introduction

Lopez, Frank (FrankLopez) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 10:55:41 -0700

34 lines

Invitation to Participate in Benchmark Study

Karen Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2004 21:14:29 -0500

63 lines

Re: Is nothing private? (From RAIN)

Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 11:04:25 -0400

82 lines

Re: Is nothing private? (From RAIN)

Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 09:38:59 -0700

76 lines

Re: Is nothing private? (From RAIN)

Grevin, Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 12:47:46 -0400

110 lines

Re: Is nothing private? (From RAIN)

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 13:02:01 -0400

28 lines

Re: Is nothing private? (From RAIN)

Train, TK <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 11:04:15 -0600

25 lines

Re: Is nothing private? (From RAIN)

Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 10:15:02 -0700

25 lines

Re: Is nothing private? (From RAIN)

Christine Watters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 13:40:46 -0400

53 lines

Re: Is nothing private? (From RAIN)

A.S.E. Fairfax <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 11:35:58 -0700

42 lines

Re: Is nothing private? (From RAIN) Now to implement.

Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 01:18:19 -0400

123 lines

Is somebody infected?

Edwin M. Hopkins, Records Management Support <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 23:54:14 -0700

34 lines

Re: Is somebody infected?

Grahame Gould <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 15:01:33 +0800

52 lines

Re: Is somebody infected?

Love, Tom (NIP) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 03:12:36 -0400

73 lines

Re: Is somebody infected?

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 07:11:07 -0400

29 lines

Re: Is somebody infected?

Edwin M. Hopkins, Records Management Support <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 09:01:08 -0700

93 lines

Job Opportunity: Records Analyst

Rich Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 12:43:09 -0600

65 lines

Re: Job Opportunity: Records Analyst

Alexander Fazekas-Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 16:44:58 -0400

14 lines

Re: Job Opportunity: Records Analyst

Tracey Black <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 16:56:51 -0400

54 lines

Re: Job Opportunity: Records Analyst

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 16:03:12 -0500

18 lines

Re: Job Opportunity: Records Analyst

Forbes, Cherise <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 09:20:14 -0400

38 lines

Job posting --NARA--Denver CO

Nancy Merz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 09:41:08 -0400

34 lines

Job posting --NARA--Denver CO

Nancy Merz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 10:45:27 -0400

36 lines

Job Posting: Global Records Manager for US Oil Co

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 16:44:16 -0400

31 lines

Korean Records Vendors and/or Facilities

Rose, Matthew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 10:45:28 -0400

30 lines

Legal Crowd Question

Calla Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2004 09:51:59 -0600

29 lines

Re: Legal Crowd Question

Gary L. Grieme <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 May 2004 11:04:03 -0500

65 lines

Lens

Dean DeBolt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 15:48:40 -0500

23 lines

Re: Lens

Grevin, Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 17:32:42 -0400

119 lines

Lifecycle Metadata

Lopez, Frank (FrankLopez) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 10:29:37 -0700

19 lines

Re: Lifecycle Metadata

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 13:41:23 -0400

33 lines

Lifecycle vs Lifespan

charis wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 16:29:20 -0600

62 lines

Local Government Preservation Committees

Scott, Paul (FPM) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 13:04:16 -0500

58 lines

Managing Electronic Records Conference (MER) May 24 - 26 in Chicago

Robert F. Williams <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 09:18:10 -0500

220 lines

MER 04 Conference: Additional Hotel Space Now Available to Handle Heavy MER '04 Registrations

Robert F. Williams <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2004 13:26:32 -0500

331 lines

Middle Names

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 15:08:23 -0700

36 lines

Re: Middle Names

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 14:39:57 -0700

41 lines

Re: Middle Names

Martin Cole <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 12:58:10 -1000

49 lines

Re: Middle Names

Grahame Gould <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 10:45:59 +0800

66 lines

Mike White is out of the office.

Mike White <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2004 01:24:49 -0400

16 lines

MS Word Properties

Catherine Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 11:28:32 -0400

37 lines

Re: MS Word Properties

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 14:12:53 -0400

31 lines

MS Word Properties

Catherine Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 09:15:32 -0400

55 lines

MS Word Properties - Summary Box

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 11:00:40 -0400

37 lines

Re: MS Word Properties - Summary Box

Patti Kraatz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 12:16:55 -0400

45 lines

Re: MS Word Properties - Summary Box

jphibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 12:34:05 -0400

40 lines

Re: MS Word Properties - Summary Box

Laino, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 12:39:35 -0500

60 lines

NAGARA Annual Meeting - Phoenix

Preston Huff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 11:04:16 -0400

23 lines

NARA Training Opportunity

Marybelle Yeazel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 15:06:05 -0400

57 lines

NARA Vacancy--Records Mgmt Training Officer, College Park, MD

Jennifer Heaps <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 11:17:52 -0400

36 lines

NARA Vacancy--Supervisory Mgmt & Program Analyst, St. Louis, MO

Jennifer Heaps <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 10:55:01 -0400

36 lines

NARA's RM article FYI....

Earl Johnson, Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 May 2004 19:51:41 -0700

45 lines

Off-site storage for Technology Tapes

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 6 May 2004 06:14:43 -0500

25 lines

Re: Off-site storage for Technology Tapes

Gerard J. Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 14:21:06 +1000

41 lines

Re: Off-site storage for Technology Tapes

Lawrence Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 13:20:19 -0700

43 lines

Off-site storage of technology tapes

Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 18:12:43 -0400

52 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes

Lawrence Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 15:50:22 -0700

36 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes

Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2004 01:16:25 -0400

52 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes

Lawrence Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2004 09:59:07 -0700

44 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes

Gerard J. Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 14:48:04 +1000

77 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 08:22:43 -0400

58 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes

Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 18:51:09 -0400

104 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 12:32:14 -0400

182 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 13:17:37 -0400

27 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Train, TK <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 11:25:19 -0600

31 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 07:51:49 -0400

22 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 08:22:24 -0400

24 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 18:12:13 -0400

69 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 20:04:54 -0400

30 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 21:31:09 -0400

67 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 21:37:29 -0400

29 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Gerard J. Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 14:37:22 +1000

50 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 06:59:52 -0400

27 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 18:44:27 -0400

65 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

NCDS - Larry Wakeman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 17:06:28 -0600

43 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 21:42:02 -0400

67 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 22:08:57 EDT

21 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 22:14:32 -0400

202 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 23:19:35 -0400

33 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Gerard Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 23:48:22 -0400

33 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2004 11:06:45 -0500

47 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2004 09:58:11 -0700

24 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2004 13:02:31 -0400

36 lines

Re: Off-site storage of technology tapes...moving on!

Gerard J. Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 03:23:36 +1000

58 lines

Re: Organization-wide Users of Microsoft Outlook Client (POP) Del ivery

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 11:20:59 -0400

29 lines

Re: Organization-wide Users of Microsoft Outlook Client (POP) Del ivery

Mallory, Alicia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 11:06:54 -0500

34 lines

Re: Organization-wide Users of Microsoft Outlook Client (POP) Del ivery

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 12:45:41 -0400

30 lines

Re: Organization-wide Users of Microsoft Outlook Client (POP) Del ivery

Yanaway, Dana E. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 14:22:52 -0400

68 lines

Organization-wide Users of Microsoft Outlook Client (POP) Delivery

P. Mershon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 11:18:57 -0400

46 lines

Origin of life cycle concept

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 08:24:57 -0700

27 lines

Re: Origin of life cycle concept

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 28 May 2004 11:41:29 EDT

20 lines

Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Agustin, Jr., Roland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 10:54:51 -0500

34 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 10:59:03 -0600

53 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 12:08:26 -0500

25 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 11:15:53 -0600

46 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 13:23:53 -0400

72 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 13:32:53 -0400

30 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 13:00:04 -0500

26 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Capshaw, Stacie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 14:42:07 -0400

30 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 13:03:58 -0700

62 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Capshaw, Stacie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 16:05:36 -0400

52 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 16:16:19 -0400

29 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 13:50:25 -0700

94 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 13:54:57 -0700

23 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 15:58:13 -0500

44 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 14:29:52 -0700

37 lines

Re: Original Document vs. Optical Disk

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 08:07:45 +1000

49 lines

OT Friday Funny

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 12:40:14 -0400

21 lines

OT spychecker sw

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 07:53:03 -0400

20 lines

Our History - was Origin of life cycle concept

Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 09:26:24 -0700

37 lines

Re: Our History - was Origin of life cycle concept

Sharon Blackstock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 10:39:46 -0600

32 lines

Re: Our History - was Origin of life cycle concept

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 12:48:04 EDT

22 lines

Re: Our History - was Origin of life cycle concept

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 12:49:27 -0400

52 lines

Re: Our History - was Origin of life cycle concept

Tina Clayton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 10:57:29 -0600

74 lines

Re: Our History - was Origin of life cycle concept

Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 10:38:04 -0700

102 lines

Re: Our History - was Origin of life cycle concept

Stephen Garner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 13:50:08 -0400

119 lines

Re: Our History - was Origin of life cycle concept

Erwin Wodarczak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 10:42:34 -0700

117 lines

Re: Our History - was Origin of life cycle concept

Gary L. Grieme <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 12:53:54 -0500

53 lines

Out-of-Office

Ian McAndrew <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 16:59:06 -0400

18 lines

Outlook calendering

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 29 May 2004 20:56:15 EDT

31 lines

Re: Outlook calendering

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 May 2004 21:09:42 EDT

31 lines

Re: Outlook calendering

Janet Lee Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 May 2004 21:25:34 -0400

48 lines

Re: Outlook calendering

bobd <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 May 2004 20:35:33 -0700

35 lines

Re: Outlook calendering

Gerard J. Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 May 2004 20:01:50 +1000

49 lines

Re: Outlook calendering

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 May 2004 08:10:44 EDT

30 lines

Re: Outlook calendering

Kirsten McKnight <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 May 2004 14:47:33 -0400

47 lines

Re: Outlook calendering

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 30 May 2004 16:26:47 EDT

23 lines

Re: Outlook calendering

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 May 2004 07:29:15 +1000

34 lines

Re: Outlook calendering

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 30 May 2004 19:20:22 -0700

21 lines

Re: Outlook calendering

Kirsten McKnight <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 May 2004 10:26:39 -0400

73 lines

Re: Outlook calendering

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2004 07:42:02 +1000

63 lines

Re: Outlook calendering

Gerard J. Nicol <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2004 08:31:00 +1000

120 lines

Re: Outlook calendering

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2004 09:08:02 +1000

41 lines

Re: Outlook calendering

Grahame Gould <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Jun 2004 08:33:15 +0800

35 lines

Outsell's Content Management Survey Reminder

Karen Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2004 13:33:12 -0500

72 lines

PAC Record Retention

Timothy, Kathleen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 06:14:54 -0700

23 lines

Photos under PIPEDA

Snudden, Bonnie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 12:55:35 -0600

41 lines

Re: Photos under PIPEDA

Sam McCollum <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 17:04:18 -0600

83 lines

PIPEDA

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 13:54:10 -0400

17 lines

PIPEDA was Re: Is nothing private? (From RAIN)

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 13:46:47 -0400

24 lines

Position Opening

Adams, Tony <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2004 16:07:29 -0700

16 lines

Puget Sound Chapter of ARMA - June Meeting Notice

bobd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 17:39:58 -0700

61 lines

Puget Sound Chapter of ARMA - May Meeting Notice

bobd <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 May 2004 11:54:31 -0700

63 lines

PWC Report

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2004 13:56:08 -0400

38 lines

Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

Clingerman, Judy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 14:32:24 -0700

35 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

Brent D. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 14:52:58 -0700

18 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

Benay Berl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 15:09:28 -0700

69 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

A.S.E. Fairfax <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 15:29:50 -0700

37 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

AF Cossham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 10:34:17 +1200

45 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

Laurie Sletten <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 15:35:56 -0700

108 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 08:05:56 +1000

60 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 08:20:05 +1000

43 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 09:21:48 +1000

44 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 06:46:49 -0400

78 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

Bergeron, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 08:49:23 -0400

86 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 09:10:48 -0400

29 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

Broud, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 11:30:31 -0400

36 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

Sharon Blackstock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 10:08:24 -0600

17 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

Gary Vocks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 11:30:53 -0500

35 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

Janet Lee Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 17:47:55 -0400

65 lines

Re: Question re Alphabetizing Last Names

bobd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 16:16:35 -0700

31 lines

RACO 2004

James Cassedy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 14:03:32 -0400

62 lines

RAIN 502 Weekend news

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 May 2004 17:22:49 EDT

183 lines

Rain 504 New Jersey, evoting

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 21:28:30 -0400

318 lines

Rain 505 Part 1

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 21:25:40 -0400

213 lines

Rain 505 Part 2 Open records

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 22:04:08 -0400

207 lines

rain 506 UK, Australia, CDrot

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 20:59:02 -0400

322 lines

Rain 509 Weekend Update

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 May 2004 16:38:34 EDT

280 lines

rain 510 shredding, blacked out words

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 21:46:51 -0400

253 lines

rain 511 Miss. UKFOIA, Digital

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 May 2004 21:30:02 -0400

130 lines

rain 512 phishing baseball old map

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 22:07:08 -0400

227 lines

rain 513 Salt Lake City Reese Navy

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 21:40:44 -0400

216 lines

RAIN 517 Monday's stories

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2004 21:22:11 -0400

225 lines

RAIN 517 Weekend roundup 1

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2004 08:58:48 -0400

168 lines

rain 517 Weekend Update 2

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 May 2004 09:10:48 -0400

178 lines

RAIN 518 blue laser, letter recovered

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2004 21:10:48 -0400

226 lines

RAIN 519 FBI analyst, Attala Count records,

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 22:23:34 -0400

178 lines

rain 520 data protection FOIA costs

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 21:07:10 -0400

183 lines

rain 523 late Sunday news

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 09:22:23 -0400

105 lines

rain 523 Sunday Roundup

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 May 2004 09:06:45 EDT

329 lines

rain 524 Microsoft email search

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 21:15:32 -0400

244 lines

rAin 526 Compliance Man

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2004 21:00:57 -0400

220 lines

rain 527 Thursday's news

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 13:23:14 EDT

236 lines

RaIn 529 Governor's Records, Photo Thief

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 May 2004 21:59:04 EDT

216 lines

RAin 530 SunDay

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 May 2004 15:24:16 EDT

137 lines

rain May 25th More on Microsoft

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 22:00:07 -0400

261 lines

Raindrip: Amex Financial Advisors fined for bad recordkeeping

Shana Schmitz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 12:47:24 -0500

32 lines

RAINdrip: Where does HIPAA figure in here??

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 07:46:10 -0700

62 lines

Re: RAINdrip: Where does HIPAA figure in here??

Liz Allan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 08:30:10 -0700

94 lines

Re: RAINdrip: Where does HIPAA figure in here??

Doug Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 08:41:57 -0700

111 lines

Re: RAINdrip: Where does HIPAA figure in here??

Lawrence Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 10:36:26 -0700

42 lines

Record lifecycle

Alan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 13:18:04 -0400

26 lines

Re: Record lifecycle

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 13:18:24 -0400

29 lines

Re: Record lifecycle

Broud, Trish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 13:28:41 -0400

32 lines

Re: Record lifecycle

Alice Young <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 13:37:20 -0400

58 lines

Re: Record lifecycle

Alan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 14:09:33 -0400

22 lines

Re: Record lifecycle

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 14:08:47 -0400

49 lines

Records - specifics and implications

Alan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 10:25:27 -0400

46 lines

Re: Records - specifics and implications

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 10:28:03 -0400

62 lines

Re: Records - specifics and implications

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 11:09:21 -0400

97 lines

Records life cycle diagrams

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 10:53:38 +1000

38 lines

Records Management in Korea

Rose, Matthew <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 10:00:45 -0400

30 lines

Request for Cluttered Office Photos

Angelou, Anne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 15:05:33 -0700

32 lines

Re: Request for Cluttered Office Photos

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 20:11:57 -0400

26 lines

Re: Request for Cluttered Office Photos

Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 23:38:55 -0700

60 lines

Re: Request for Cluttered Office Photos

Angelou, Anne <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 07:45:05 -0700

41 lines

Re: Request for Cluttered Office Photos

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 09:28:44 -0700

24 lines

Request for records

Benay Berl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 10:34:32 -0700

37 lines

Re: Request for records

Sharon Blackstock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 11:52:44 -0600

20 lines

Re: Request for records

Benay Berl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 11:01:42 -0700

34 lines

Re: Request for records

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 14:10:12 -0400

27 lines

Re: Request for records

Mallory, Alicia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 13:32:28 -0500

17 lines

Re: Request for records

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 13:35:52 -0500

25 lines

Re: Request for records

John Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 15:20:36 -0700

62 lines

Re: Request for records

Lawrence Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 15:23:10 -0700

41 lines

Re: Request for records

John Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 16:14:00 -0700

80 lines

Research

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 08:03:04 -0700

27 lines

Re: Research

Doug Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 12:35:41 -0400

96 lines

Research

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 May 2004 16:54:12 -0700

18 lines

Responses - inexpensive records management software

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 1 May 2004 13:51:48 EDT

40 lines

Retention Manager

Belrose, Sharon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 16:54:13 -0400

48 lines

Re: Retention Manager

Gerri Bradford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 08:58:43 -0600

56 lines

RFID

Kay Juricek <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 15:54:46 -0600

19 lines

Re: RFID

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 May 2004 08:47:57 +1000

29 lines

Rhonda Boehm/MDACC is out of the office.

Rhonda Boehm <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 May 2004 23:02:41 -0500

13 lines

RIM course work was Job opportunity

Benay Berl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 08:56:21 -0700

67 lines

Re: RIM course work was Job opportunity

Grevin, Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 12:01:15 -0400

103 lines

Re: RIM course work was Job opportunity

Jeanne Callen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 11:11:41 -0500

82 lines

Re: RIM course work was Job opportunity

Forbes, Cherise <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 13:04:33 -0400

103 lines

Re: RIM course work was Job opportunity

Tim Barnard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 13:02:07 -0500

30 lines

Re: RIM course work was Job opportunity

Calla Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 12:54:49 -0600

88 lines

Re: RIM course work was Job opportunity

Jim Mullen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 10:30:38 -0700

63 lines

RIM Resources Yahoo Group

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 May 2004 09:21:42 -0700

67 lines

RIM software

Emilie Himm <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 12:16:45 -0400

30 lines

Re: RIM software

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 12:26:40 -0400

31 lines

Re: RIM software

Janet L Nelson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 11:27:43 -0500

30 lines

Re: RIM software

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 15:32:54 -0700

53 lines

Re: RIM software

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 May 2004 20:19:14 -0400

21 lines

Shareware/Freeware Tools

Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2004 18:52:20 -0700

35 lines

Some REAL food for thought in this RAIN article!!

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 09:36:11 -0700

38 lines

SOUTH FLORIDA VENDOR - DUPLICATE MICROFICHE

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 20 May 2004 13:10:51 -0400

21 lines

SR. RM Position -Washington, D.C.

Edwards-Norman, Joann (Contractor) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2004 16:24:29 -0400

20 lines

storing to CD/DVD

Mike Levin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 18:05:12 -0400

35 lines

Tangible items as records

Edwin M. Hopkins, Records Management Support <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 May 2004 23:03:41 -0700

25 lines

Re: Tangible items as records

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 06:56:03 -0400

29 lines

Re: Tangible items as records

Eugenia Brunn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 07:21:13 -0400

61 lines

Re: Tangible items as records

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 08:09:28 -0400

27 lines

Thank you

Belrose, Sharon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 12:54:42 -0400

44 lines

THANKS, ETC.

Gus Harris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 16:18:08 -0500

33 lines

Re: THANKS, ETC.

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 16:44:01 -0500

25 lines

Re: THANKS, ETC.

Gus Harris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 17:00:50 -0500

41 lines

Re: THANKS, ETC.

Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 15:07:40 -0700

41 lines

The ol' Pricewaterhouse Coopers Study

Sharon Blackstock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 16:57:17 -0600

31 lines

Re: The ol' Pricewaterhouse Coopers Study

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 17:14:20 -0700

41 lines

Re: The ol' Pricewaterhouse Coopers Study

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 May 2004 20:25:58 -0400

26 lines

Re: The ol' Pricewaterhouse Coopers Study

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 10:43:03 +1000

35 lines

Re: The ol' Pricewaterhouse Coopers Study

Robert Mullholand <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 09:24:07 -0500

51 lines

Re: The ol' Pricewaterhouse Coopers Study

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 07:47:41 -0400

18 lines

Re: The ol' Pricewaterhouse Coopers Study

Scott, Paul (FPM) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 10:01:16 -0500

24 lines

Re: The ol' Pricewaterhouse Coopers Study

Jan Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 10:02:46 -0500

72 lines

Re: The ol' Pricewaterhouse Coopers Study

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 08:18:29 -0700

21 lines

Re: The ol' Pricewaterhouse Coopers Study

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 10:48:02 -0700

40 lines

Re: The ol' Pricewaterhouse Coopers Study

Nolene Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 11:54:42 -0700

25 lines

Re: The ol' Pricewaterhouse Coopers Study - let's make one up

Sharon Blackstock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 09:24:03 -0600

22 lines

Re: The ol' Pricewaterhouse Coopers Study - let's make one up

Belrose, Sharon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 11:25:48 -0400

36 lines

Tiny URL - What a Great Website

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 14:21:10 -0400

31 lines

Re: Tiny URL - What a Great Website

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 May 2004 14:32:22 -0400

22 lines

Training Opportunity- NARA-Great Lakes Region - Chicago

Marybelle Yeazel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 May 2004 15:00:14 -0400

94 lines

unsub RECMGMT-L

Steve MacWilliams <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 May 2004 20:37:19 -0700

21 lines

UNSUB [log in to unmask]

Ahern, Pamela <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 May 2004 08:08:11 -0700

11 lines

UNSUBSCRIBE

Jenna Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 10:38:51 -0600

39 lines

Re: UNSUBSCRIBE

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 May 2004 12:55:27 -0400

43 lines

Wet documents

Shari Coughenour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 17:32:34 -0500

26 lines

Re: Wet documents

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 20:14:26 -0400

21 lines

Re: Wet documents

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 20:00:39 -0700

35 lines

Re: Wet documents

Jenny Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 17:20:31 +1000

27 lines

Re: Wet documents

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 08:30:22 -0400

68 lines

Re: Wet documents

Shari Coughenour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 08:39:40 -0500

86 lines

Re: Wet documents

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 08:42:13 -0700

47 lines

Re: Wet documents

Shari Coughenour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 11:19:39 -0500

63 lines

Re: Wet documents (The Topic that Won't Die)

Scott, Paul (FPM) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 12:10:03 -0500

22 lines

Re: Wet documents (The Topic that Won't Die)

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 13:40:00 -0400

27 lines

Re: Wet documents (The Topic that Won't Die)

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 13:38:17 -0400

50 lines

Re: Wet documents (The Topic that Won't Die)

Tom Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 11:01:56 -0700

60 lines

Re: Wet documents (The Topic that Won't Die)

Lawrence Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 15:58:59 -0700

131 lines

Re: Wet documents (The Topic that Won't Die)

Nolene Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 May 2004 16:41:21 -0700

58 lines

Re: Wet documents (The Topic that Won't Die)

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2004 08:41:23 -0400

49 lines

Re: Wet documents (The Topic that Won't Die)

Scott, Paul (FPM) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 May 2004 15:03:37 -0500

35 lines

Re: Wet documents (The Topic that Won't Die)

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 May 2004 05:50:08 -0500

30 lines

When did life-cycle concept get coined?

Choksy, Carol E B <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 08:27:30 -0500

24 lines

Re: When did life-cycle concept get coined?

Kathleen Lannon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 07:06:09 -0700

18 lines

Re: When did life-cycle concept get coined?

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 10:15:02 -0400

44 lines

Re: When did life-cycle concept get coined?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 28 May 2004 10:47:55 EDT

20 lines

Re: When did life-cycle concept get coined?

Patti Kraatz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 10:18:04 -0400

79 lines

Re: When did life-cycle concept get coined?

Michael, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 09:03:54 -0600

51 lines

Re: When did life-cycle concept get coined?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 28 May 2004 11:04:07 -0400

16 lines

Re: When did life-cycle concept get coined?

Laurie Sletten <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 08:13:48 -0700

81 lines

Re: When did life-cycle concept get coined?

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 May 2004 08:14:24 -0700

41 lines

Which yahoo group.

Christine Watters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 10:55:45 -0400

21 lines

Re: Which yahoo group.

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 10:58:56 -0400

27 lines

Re: Which yahoo group.

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 May 2004 11:44:13 -0400

20 lines

Why store records in cardboard boxes

Bergeron, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 16:02:01 -0400

46 lines

Re: Why store records in cardboard boxes

Savage, Jimmie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 15:12:41 -0500

65 lines

Re: Why store records in cardboard boxes

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 15:28:18 -0500

16 lines

Re: Why store records in cardboard boxes

Sharon Blackstock <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 14:26:56 -0600

20 lines

Re: Why store records in cardboard boxes

Belrose, Sharon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 16:36:28 -0400

83 lines

Why store records in cardboard boxes

Catherine Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 16:46:21 -0400

78 lines

Re: Why store records in cardboard boxes

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 13:44:27 -0700

42 lines

Re: Why store records in cardboard boxes

Scott, Paul (FPM) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 May 2004 15:49:54 -0500

20 lines

Re: Why store records in cardboard boxes

Bergeron, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 08:28:26 -0400

49 lines

Re: Why store records in cardboard boxes

Steve Petersen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 07:57:36 -0500

17 lines

Re: Why store records in cardboard boxes

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 May 2004 08:53:19 -0700

44 lines

[FWD: Re: Define Implementation]

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 7 May 2004 21:35:46 -0700

22 lines


Back to: Main RECMGMT-L Page



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager