LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for RECMGMT-L Archives


RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives


February 2005, Week 2


Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Search Archives


Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re: @SPAM++++ Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:31:04 -0500

50 lines

Re: @SPAM++++ Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Lawrence Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:43:29 -0800

27 lines

Re: @SPAM++++ Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:01:39 -0500

24 lines

A New Archivist of the US

Rick Barry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:50:29 EST

101 lines

Re: A New Archivist of the US

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:27:39 -0800

36 lines

Re: A New Archivist of the US

White, Bruce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:44:22 -0800

165 lines

Re: A New Archivist of the US

Vicki Walch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:28:20 -0600

57 lines

Re: A New Archivist of the US

Schildmeyer, Greg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:57:35 -0600

47 lines

Re: A New Archivist of the US

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:33:40 -0600

33 lines

Re: A New Archivist of the US

Markley, Patricia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:42:53 -0500

51 lines

Re: A New Archivist of the US

Gary L. Grieme <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:59:58 -0600

98 lines

Re: A New Archivist of the US

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:07:48 -0500

66 lines

Re: A New Archivist of the US

Michael Sharpe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:30:01 -0700

61 lines

Re: A New Archivist of the US

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:54:55 -0500

44 lines

A New Archivist of the US--Off On a Tangent

Scott, Paul (FPM) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:42:59 -0600

38 lines

Re: A New Archivist of the US--Off On a Tangent

White, Bruce <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:06:58 -0800

76 lines

Re: A New Archivist of the US--Off On a Tangent

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:22:15 -0500

35 lines

Re: A New Archivist of the US--Off On a Tangent

Tyler, Judy K Ms DACH-Ft Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:03:27 -0600

122 lines

Re: A New Archivist of the US--Off On a Tangent

Persons, Henry <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:25:14 -0500

145 lines

ADMIN replying to the list

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:31:30 -0500

37 lines

Re: An Existing Program or advice

Stephanie Ann Coffer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:21:30 -0500

19 lines

ARMA-Austin Presents David O. Stephens

Mallory, Alicia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:19:21 -0600

64 lines

Re: Cabinet to store microfiche or rolls of microfilm

Allen, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:21:10 -0400

62 lines

Re: Cabinet to store microfiche or rolls of microfilm

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:03:28 -0500

34 lines

Career Opportunity - Washington, DC

Hurd, Daniel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:59:41 -0500

25 lines

Cave paintings, was: RE: Finally Kutztown makes the RAIN

Laura Hensey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:02:57 -0500

37 lines

Re: Cave paintings, was: RE: Finally Kutztown makes the RAIN

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:22:26 -0500

35 lines

Re: Cave paintings, was: RE: Finally Kutztown makes the RAIN

Bob Nawrocki <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:27:18 +0000

68 lines

Credit card fraud and wireless PC security -- Friday off topic

Bergeron, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:05:29 -0500

35 lines

CRM & Working on those Letters! was Google strikes again

Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:48:34 -0800

30 lines

DOJ OIG report on FBI Case File system

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 07:21:17 -0500

20 lines

Dress code query

Bergeron, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:21:31 -0500

38 lines

Re: Dress code query

Joshua Price <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:00:36 -0600

70 lines

Re: Dress code query

Laura Hensey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:05:23 -0500

51 lines

Re: Dress code query

Tyler, Judy K Ms DACH-Ft Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:17:28 -0600

87 lines

Re: Dress code query

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:20:58 -0500

52 lines

Re: Dress code query

Hojnacki, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:39:41 -0600

109 lines

Re: Dress code query

Hojnacki, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:43:00 -0600

109 lines

Re: Dress code query

Sharon Blackstock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:32:31 -0700

38 lines

Re: Dress code query

Bergeron, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:47:53 -0500

74 lines

Re: Dress code query

Gary L. Grieme <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:30:05 -0600

87 lines

Re: Dress code query

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:22:13 -0800

37 lines

Re: Dress code query

Nicole Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:45:07 -0600

27 lines

Re: Dress code query

Nolene Sherman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:46:41 -0800

36 lines

Re: Dress code query

Gerri Bradford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:25:44 -0700

74 lines

Re: Dress code query

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:20:54 -0500

29 lines

Re: Dress code query

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:43:40 -0500

28 lines

Re: Dress code query

Alice Young <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:49:30 -0500

28 lines

Dress code summary -- and thank you

Bergeron, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:49:18 -0500

113 lines

Re: Dress code summary -- and thank you

Michael Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:28:51 -0800

38 lines

Re: Dress code summary -- and thank you

Bergeron, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:43:26 -0500

65 lines

Re: Dress code summary -- and thank you

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:59:35 -0500

36 lines

electronic records retention/disposition

Gus Harris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:57:15 -0600

24 lines

Re: electronic records retention/disposition

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:11:53 -0500

26 lines

Electronic Signatures

Agustin, Jr., Roland <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:14:30 -0600

32 lines

Re: Electronic Signatures

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:22:09 -0500

36 lines

Re: Electronic Signatures

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:52:21 -0600

46 lines

Re: Electronic Signatures

Laurie Varendorff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:20:41 +0800

67 lines

Re: Electronic Signatures

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:47:07 -0500

63 lines

Re: Electronic Signatures

John Lovejoy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:20:34 +1100

38 lines

Re: Electronic Signatures

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:15:23 -0500

39 lines

Re: Electronic Signatures

Grevin, Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:24:27 -0500

84 lines

Re: Electronic Signatures

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:43:22 -0500

28 lines

Re: Electronic Signatures

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:46:07 -0500

108 lines

Re: Electronic Signatures

Breeden, John B. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:32:11 -0500

25 lines

Re: Electronic Signatures

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:23:27 -0500

52 lines

Re: Electronic Signatures

Grevin, Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:11:54 -0500

84 lines

Re: Electronic Signatures

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:28:09 -0500

43 lines

Eletronic Records Project Archivists positions available

Riccardo Ferrante <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:26:57 -0500

60 lines

Re: Finally Kutztown makes the RAIN

Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:36:30 -0500

37 lines

Re: Finally Kutztown makes the RAIN

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:13:54 -0600

18 lines

Re: Finally Kutztown makes the RAIN

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:18:17 -0500

34 lines

Re: Finally Kutztown makes the RAIN

Garner, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:22:28 -0500

34 lines

Re: Finally Kutztown makes the RAIN

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:34:39 -0500

35 lines

Friday OT - Archivist Qual and Archivist of the US

Piotrowski, Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:54:23 -0500

85 lines

Fwd: Re: Dress Code Inquiry

Joseph Showl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:02:57 -0500

28 lines

Gartner Urges Caution Before Downloading Firefox

Rich Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:59:25 -0700

19 lines

Re: Gartner Urges Caution Before Downloading Firefox

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:33:47 -0500

33 lines

GKC ARMA Chapter's Spring Seminar

Lamont, Laura D [CC] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:16:38 -0600

29 lines

Google strikes again

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:29:05 -0500

21 lines

Re: Google strikes again

Gervais, John <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:06:24 -0500

33 lines

Re: Google strikes again

Hilliard, Mary <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:11:02 -0600

39 lines

Re: Google strikes again

Johnson, Earl [CRDUS non j&J] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:17:30 -0500

38 lines

Grettings

Roman Martinez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:56:54 -0800

30 lines

Job opening in Wonderful Wyoming: Records Analyst (Class Code:RM13-7854)

Rich Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:55:55 -0700

57 lines

Job Opportunity - Records Analyst

Harvey William <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:52:51 -0600

33 lines

Job Opportunity -- Records Operations Manager (US / Illinois / Chicago)

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:54:14 -0600

168 lines

Massachusetts Statewide Records Retention Schedule

Cleveland, Bill @ SEC <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:34:18 -0500

17 lines

Re: Microfilm cabinets

Brad Casey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:28:39 EST

23 lines

Mozilla Firefox (was RE: So you liked Google Maps)

Grahame Gould <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:55:22 +0800

27 lines

NARA Training Opportunities- Detroit, MI

Marybelle Yeazel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:12:33 -0500

58 lines

need powerpoint help

Gus Harris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:54:10 -0600

47 lines

Re: need powerpoint help

Alan S. Zaben <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:56:28 -0500

129 lines

Re: need powerpoint help

Gus Harris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:25:09 -0600

163 lines

Re: need powerpoint help

Terry Schofield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:42:56 -0500

36 lines

Re: need powerpoint help

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:59:52 -0500

22 lines

New Archivist

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:17:29 -0800

18 lines

Re: New Archivist

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:36:50 -0500

26 lines

Re: New Archivist

Zelenyj, Dan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:08:31 -0500

69 lines

Re: New Archivist

White, Bruce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:15:53 -0800

36 lines

Re: New Archivist

Zelenyj, Dan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:00:37 -0500

83 lines

Re: New Archivist

Michael Sharpe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:53:16 -0700

85 lines

Re: New Archivist

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:04:14 +1100

31 lines

Re: New Archivist

Michael Sharpe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:17:18 -0700

96 lines

New Tx legislation

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:01:01 -0500

20 lines

Nina Jin/CTR/CTC is out of the office

Nina Jin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 01:01:32 -0500

16 lines

Opportunities Available: Marketing Mgr. & Sales Supp. Analyst

Tracey Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 06:41:00 -0800

71 lines

RAIN 0208 Grant, EMC Centera UK FOIA

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:24:20 -0500

117 lines

RAIN 0209 KY FOIA, Archivist award, on the'net

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:25:23 -0500

171 lines

RAIN 0210 Presidential Libraries, Replevin, Dumpster Diving

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:52:56 -0500

299 lines

rain 0211 KY FOIA, HIPAA ruling

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:02:35 EST

153 lines

RAIN 0212 KY FOIA, Black History Displayed, Yemen

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:31:10 EST

133 lines

RAIN 0213 Kutztown, Medical Records , India

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 21:00:22 -0500

121 lines

RAIN 0214 Canadian Secrets, Estonia, Turkey, Civil War letters

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:15:59 -0500

223 lines

RAINdrop: Reducing Medical Errors

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:56:32 -0800

36 lines

Records Clerk Job Description

Lyn Frazer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:21:13 -0600

43 lines

Re: Records Clerk Job Description

Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:47:15 -0800

70 lines

Re: Records Clerk Job Description

Moo, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:56:58 -0600

33 lines

Re: Records Clerk Job Description

Starck, Brian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:33:10 -0700

39 lines

Re: Records Clerk Job Description

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:02:36 -0500

24 lines

RECORDS MANAGEMENT ON INTRANET

Nel Annelie Spoornet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:46:21 +0200

34 lines

Re: RECORDS MANAGEMENT ON INTRANET

Lamont, Laura D [CC] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:38:16 -0600

67 lines

Re: RECORDS MANAGEMENT ON INTRANET

Nel Annelie Spoornet <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:32:15 +0200

88 lines

Reminder - ARMA-Liberty Bell Chapter February 17th Seminar

Janice Hulme <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:27:31 -0500

41 lines

Reminder: ARMA Election

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:17:32 -0600

16 lines

Re: Reminder: ARMA Election

Records Management <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:47:56 -1000

58 lines

Re: Reminder: ARMA Election (Away from the office)

William Lefurgy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:51:03 -0500

13 lines

RFP 3rd Party Provider

Joseph R. DeLozier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:42:08 -0500

40 lines

Re: RFP 3rd Party Provider

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:47:30 -0500

25 lines

Role of RIM in Paperless Initiatives

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:21:03 -0800

39 lines

Re: Role of RIM in Paperless Initiatives

John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:46:58 -0500

34 lines

Re: Role of RIM in Paperless Initiatives

Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:47:01 -0800

31 lines

Re: Role of RIM in Paperless Initiatives

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:21:18 -0800

87 lines

Re: Role of RIM in Paperless Initiatives

Lorie Mcaleb <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:52:54 -0700

47 lines

So you liked Google Maps

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:43:34 -0500

21 lines

Re: So you liked Google Maps

White, Bruce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:36:15 -0800

46 lines

Stenographic machine output. Boston City Council records.

Don Saklad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:54:52 -0500

15 lines

Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Mike Purington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:47:14 -0500

21 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:16:45 -0500

37 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

A.Khramtsovsky <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:39:00 +0300

31 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 06:23:18 -0800

38 lines

Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Richards, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:31:42 -0600

145 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:55:17 EST

27 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Tim Barnard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:06:58 -0600

27 lines

Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Mike Purington <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:58:58 -0500

33 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Liz Allan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:26:39 -0800

57 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:32:55 -0500

57 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:37:52 -0500

51 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:47:54 -0500

37 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Garner, Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:55:30 -0500

56 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Richards, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:12:26 -0600

122 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Grevin, Frederic <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:19:46 -0500

149 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Liz Allan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:59:57 -0800

83 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:25:35 -0800

41 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Richards, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:33:48 -0600

110 lines

Re: Third Party Storage Vendors and Disasters

Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:19:57 -0500

154 lines

Using TIFF Compressed or JPEG for color images

Shirley Calvert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:56:44 -0500

35 lines

Re: Using TIFF Compressed or JPEG for color images

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:32:27 -0600

17 lines

Re: Using TIFF Compressed or JPEG for color images

Stacey Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:40:12 -0500

85 lines

Re: Using TIFF Compressed or JPEG for color images

Bil Kellermann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:17:51 -0800

72 lines

Re: Using TIFF Compressed or JPEG for color images

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:51:10 -0600

113 lines

Re: Using TIFF Compressed or JPEG for color images

Laurie Varendorff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:42:07 +0800

67 lines

Re: What Makes Legal RM Unique [was: Legal ISG the Largest in ARM A]

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 07:57:34 -0600

38 lines

Re: What Makes Legal RM Unique [was: Legal ISG the Largest in ARM A]

Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:08:00 -0800

18 lines

Re: What Makes Legal RM Unique [was: Legal ISG the Largest in ARM A]

Roach, Bill J. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:32:53 -0600

18 lines

Re: What Makes Legal RM Unique [was: Legal ISG the Largest in ARM A]

White, Bruce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:47:51 -0800

52 lines

Re: What Makes Legal RM Unique [was: Legal ISG the Largest in ARM A]

Nemchek, Lee R. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:33:09 -0800

92 lines

Wyoming Public records bill - HB 270 update

Janie Wait <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:35:11 -0700

244 lines


Back to: Main RECMGMT-L Page



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager