LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for RECMGMT-L Archives


RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives


January 2009, Week 3


Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Search Archives


Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

a list of all [Boston] city commissions and boards as of January 7, 2009, names, conditions of appointment and time period length, salaries and all meeting minutes from 2008.

don warner saklad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:30:10 -0500

32 lines

Anyone On Here Working with a Housing Authority?

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:44:10 -0600

33 lines

Re: Anyone On Here Working with a Housing Authority?

Jennifer Snyder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:01:16 -0800

23 lines

Blogs, Blawgs, blahhhhgs and their content

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:28:13 -0500

75 lines

Confidential Info / Data Privacy Structures

Nystedt, Sheri <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:09:27 -0700

36 lines

Costs for Legacy Box Review and Disposition

Jeffrey @ Waters Edge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:25:59 -0500

89 lines

Current List of RIM Educational Opportunities, and More!

Luciana Duranti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:17:15 -0800

113 lines

Director Named for Planned George Bush Library

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:26:55 -0600

51 lines

Filing System Best Practices re: Separating active from inactive records

Vandenberg, Erin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:08:12 -0600

69 lines

Free Security Training from Dept of Homeland Security

Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:55:24 -0600

25 lines

FW: President Obama Revokes Bush Presidential Records Executive Order

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:56:24 -0500

42 lines

FW: private IT consultants

Chris Black (Fiscal Research) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:57:07 -0500

30 lines

Re: Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:53:21 -0500

85 lines

Re: Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:17:57 -0600

61 lines

Re: Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:24:21 -0600

23 lines

Re: Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:28:42 -0600

44 lines

Re: Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:41:52 -0700

20 lines

Re: Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:44:42 -0600

38 lines

Re: Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:52:18 -0500

36 lines

Re: Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:59:50 -0600

49 lines

Re: Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:00:24 -0800

34 lines

Re: Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:07:24 -0600

60 lines

Re: Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:21:35 -0700

22 lines

Re: Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

Gordon Hoke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:46:58 -0600

25 lines

Re: Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:09:48 -0800

41 lines

Re: Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:21:12 -0500

72 lines

Importance of DoD 5015.2?

Gordon Hoke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:26:51 -0600

27 lines

Re: Importance of DoD 5015.2?

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:40:27 -0600

60 lines

Re: Importance of DoD 5015.2?

Pilar McAdam <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:06:31 -0800

90 lines

Re: Importance of DoD 5015.2?

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:08:57 -0500

77 lines

Re: Importance of DoD 5015.2?

Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:13:51 -0500

77 lines

Re: Importance of DoD 5015.2?

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:24:53 -0700

37 lines

Re: Importance of DoD 5015.2?

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:02:11 -0500

47 lines

Information Security Training

Susan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:28:15 -0600

50 lines

It's all yours.....

pakurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:17:59 +0000

27 lines

Job Posting CANADA-Alberta-Edmonton Senior Records Officer

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:29:37 -0500

91 lines

Lifehacker: Cut down on Clutter with a Records Retention Policy

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:03:20 -0700

40 lines

Re: Lifehacker: Cut down on Clutter with a Records Retention Policy

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:38:56 -0500

42 lines

Re: Lifehacker: Cut down on Clutter with a Records Retention Policy

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:43:08 -0700

24 lines

NOW List Hist...Re: [RM] Hamilton Beach moves from Lotus Domino/Notes to Gmail

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:53:59 -0800

55 lines

Re: President Obama Revokes Bush Presidential Records Executive Order

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:22:13 -0800

29 lines

RAIN 20090106 Cayman Islands, Holocaust Archives, Obama Sermons, TV History

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:27:58 -0500

301 lines

RAIN 20090108 Archivist leaves, Data Breaches, Intellectual Property, Holocaust Records, Digitized Records

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:56:03 -0500

249 lines

RAIN 20090110 Visitors Logs, Spoliation, Ediscovery

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:34:17 -0500

346 lines

RAIN 20090112 Solomon Islands, Spoliation Ruling, Twitter Archive, Obama's belt, Lincoln Legal Papers

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:47:02 -0500

185 lines

RAIN 20090114 Paper Trail, Pa open records, NC emails, Love Letters, Metadata not public

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:54:03 -0500

335 lines

RAINDrop - Payment Processor Breach May Be Largest Ever

Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:20:33 -0800

28 lines

RAINdrop - White House Emails

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:08:23 -0500

37 lines

RAINdrop Cheney's records

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:41:57 -0500

37 lines

Re: RAINdrop Cheney's records

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:23:49 -0600

27 lines

Re: RAINdrop Cheney's records

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:46:01 -0500

52 lines

RAINdrop History of the Internet video

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:23:30 -0500

23 lines

RAINDrop: Email Hacking

Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:39:37 -0500

41 lines

RAINDrop: Mining Map Preservation

Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:24:22 -0500

30 lines

Raising the Bar: NY/NJ Educational Event

Crystal Cutler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:28:58 -0500

41 lines

Rational Retention

Deanna Brouillette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:59:48 -0600

40 lines

Re: Rational Retention

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:42:46 -0500

29 lines

Re: Rational Retention

Deanna Brouillette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:49:26 -0600

32 lines

Re: Rational Retention

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:32:31 -0500

36 lines

Re: Rational Retention

Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:43:43 +1100

31 lines

Storing Electronic and Paper Records

Manago, William M <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:52:37 -0500

34 lines

Storing Electronic and Paper Records

Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:33:32 -0500

69 lines

Re: Storing Electronic and Paper Records

Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:25:30 -0500

86 lines

Re: Storing Electronic and Paper Records

Manago, William M <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:01:09 -0500

50 lines

Re: Storing Electronic and Paper Records

Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:24:26 -0600

28 lines

Student Transcript Data Capture

keith.harris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:14:05 -0600

31 lines

Use of Version Number and Version Date in footers

L Carpenter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:34:42 -0800

44 lines

Re: Use of Version Number and Version Date in footers

Chris Holmes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:55:12 +1000

80 lines

Re: Use of Version Number and Version Date in footers

Cutts, Tammy D <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:01:40 -0800

24 lines

Re: Use of Version Number and Version Date in footers

TC Makinen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:15:52 -0500

41 lines

Re: Use of Version Number and Version Date in footers

Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:25:43 -0800

35 lines

Re: Use of Version Number and Version Date in footers

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:07:06 -0500

55 lines

WAS: Would these photos... NOW: What is a record?

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:21:47 -0500

52 lines

Re: Why do you think Obama won't use a Blackberry as President? What is your guess?

Don Prososki <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:00:40 -0800

60 lines

Would these photos be considered records?

Kelly_Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:38:57 -0500

41 lines

Re: Would these photos be considered records?

Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:32:06 -0800

72 lines

Re: Would these photos be considered records?

Lori Nordland <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:49:01 -0700

148 lines

Re: Would these photos be considered records?

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:23:46 -0800

22 lines

Re: Would these photos be considered records?

Luciana Duranti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:55:47 -0800

95 lines

Re: Would these photos be considered records?

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:29:50 -0500

43 lines

Re: Would these photos be considered records?

Kelly_Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:39:31 -0500

42 lines

Re: Would these photos be considered records?

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:11:32 -0500

34 lines

Re: Would these photos be considered records?

Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:39:34 -0500

46 lines


Back to: Main RECMGMT-L Page



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager