LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for RECMGMT-L Archives


RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives


February 2009, Week 2


Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Search Archives


Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

ADMIN GENTLE REMINDER WAS Re: [RM] ISO 15489

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:08:41 -0500

37 lines

ADMIN pls read was Re: [RM] Help...leaving for vacation.

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:16:44 -0500

40 lines

Archival Award of Excellence

Metzer, Laren <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:53:50 -0800

61 lines

ARMA International Elections End February 16

JFrost <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:10:57 -0600

35 lines

Career Opportunity: Senior Records Manager

Hurd, Daniel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 15:51:55 -0500

56 lines

Classifying Records Management

McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:19:49 -0600

62 lines

Re: Classifying Records Management

Trudy Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:57:57 -0500

98 lines

Re: Classifying Records Management

Gordon Hoke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:05:28 -0600

36 lines

Re: Classifying Records Management

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:13:09 -0800

108 lines

Re: Classifying Records Management

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:52:42 -0600

42 lines

Re: Classifying Records Management

McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:14:09 -0600

49 lines

Re: Classifying Records Management

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:57:00 -0500

46 lines

Re: Classifying Records Management

John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:16:16 -0500

33 lines

Re: Classifying Records Management

Alice Young <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:36:07 -0500

46 lines

Re: Classifying Records Management

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:04:12 -0500

36 lines

Re: Classifying Records Management

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:09:29 -0800

39 lines

Close to OT - RainDrip - Mysterious Scientology Project Raises Questions in Wyoming

Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:59:06 -0500

26 lines

Construction of Archival Building - Brief for Architects

Nucoon Blake <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:33:37 +0100

29 lines

Re: Construction of Archival Building - Brief for Architects

Stephen Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:53:49 -0500

47 lines

Re: Construction of Archival Building - Brief for Architects

Starck, Brian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:35:27 -0700

54 lines

Re: Construction of Archival Building - Brief for Architects

Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:47:53 -0500

147 lines

Re: Construction of Archival Building - Brief for Architects

Stephen Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:24:11 -0500

36 lines

Re: Consultation estimate

Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:02:36 -0600

80 lines

Re: Consultation estimate

Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:03:23 -0800

122 lines

Re: Consultation estimate

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:14:28 -0500

33 lines

Re: Consultation estimate

Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:40:24 -0600

45 lines

Re: Consultation estimate

Stephen Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:08:33 -0500

53 lines

Re: Consultation estimate

Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:40:48 -0800

93 lines

Copyright

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:51:15 -0800

31 lines

Re: Copyright

Pilar McAdam <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:25:14 -0800

55 lines

Diary of a Body

Russell D. James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:33:16 -0600

68 lines

Email archiving retention question

Mrozak, Suzanne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:25:13 -0500

31 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

Tucker, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:35:43 -0500

44 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:43:53 -0500

125 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:58:07 -0700

52 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:08:43 -0500

50 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:39:18 -0600

55 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:45:44 -0700

32 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:01:09 -0600

37 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:58:07 -0700

67 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

Kevin Tisdel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:19:44 -0500

73 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

Mrozak, Suzanne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:35:24 -0500

99 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

Maureen Cusack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:06:27 -0800

103 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

Josh McLane <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:59:58 -0500

119 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:28:00 -0600

63 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:31:56 -0600

124 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:35:52 -0500

129 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

Maureen Cusack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:50:53 -0800

34 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

Schmitz Fuhrig, Lynda <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:55:07 -0500

85 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:16:52 -0800

37 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:20:19 -0800

31 lines

Re: Email archiving retention question

John James O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:25:55 +0800

107 lines

Email management software - just the names

Joan Brunning-Symons <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:32:53 -0600

31 lines

Re: Email management software - just the names

Kevin Tisdel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:04:54 -0500

74 lines

Re: Email management software - just the names

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:47:26 -0700

128 lines

Re: Email management software - just the names

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:55:27 -0700

24 lines

Re: Email management software - just the names

Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:12:58 -0600

16 lines

EU REACH Environmental Legislation

Steve Petersen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:54:29 -0600

55 lines

Re: EU REACH Environmental Legislation

vlemieux <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:35:01 -0000

74 lines

Fantastic Seminar in Northern Virginia

Angela Tayfun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:56:53 -0500

139 lines

Federal Government in General and Digital Records

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:22:28 -0500

42 lines

Re: Federal Government in General and Digital Records - There You Go Again

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:39:33 -0600

47 lines

Re: Federated Records Management

Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:25:42 -0600

63 lines

FW: CRM Seminar - February 27-28

Roffee, Cristina [HMA] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:26:35 -0800

107 lines

FW: CRM Seminar - Respond by Feb 13 if planning to register

Roffee, Cristina [HMA] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:27:19 -0800

88 lines

FW: OC ARMA February Event - Thursday, February 19, 2009

Roffee, Cristina [HMA] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:25:08 -0800

116 lines

FW: [RM] ISO 15489

Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:31:21 -0500

45 lines

FW: [RM] Legal Hold Orders

Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:35:22 -0500

100 lines

FW: [RM] Legal Hold Orders

Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:51:36 -0500

44 lines

Having Minimum Best Policy

Russell D. James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:57:31 -0600

76 lines

Help...leaving for vacation.

Jennifer Engel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:47:21 -0800

56 lines

Information Specialist job opportunity

Bergeron, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:14:26 -0500

54 lines

Re: Information Specialist job opportunity - Irvine, CA not TX

Bergeron, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:55:51 -0500

67 lines

Intellectual freedom at Cambridge Public Library. Records management. City archives. Archival practices.

don warner saklad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:05:01 -0500

68 lines

ISO 15489

Joe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:44:27 -0800

21 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:48:03 -0700

26 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:52:27 -0800

27 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:09:14 -0500

30 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Joe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:16:54 -0800

74 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:22:54 -0800

81 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:30:15 -0700

24 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Mark Chase <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:34:23 -0500

121 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:32:49 -0800

54 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:34:16 -0800

38 lines

Re: ISO 15489

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:38:18 -0800

22 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Greene, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:37:31 -0600

50 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:42:38 -0600

83 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Elizabeth Parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:45:42 -0000

109 lines

Re: ISO 15489

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:55:22 -0800

20 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Erika M Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:22 -0500

153 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:59:00 -0600

37 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:00:21 -0500

29 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:08:33 -0500

38 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:55:54 -0500

82 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Fischer, Linda <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:32:09 -0800

102 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:35:45 -0800

45 lines

Re: ISO 15489

McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:35:27 -0600

40 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:44:54 -0800

36 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Joe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:50:57 -0800

64 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Bill Benedon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:58:51 EST

25 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Sanderson, Glen (Swift Technology) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:14:14 -0000

24 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:21:35 -0500

27 lines

Re: ISO 15489

Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:43:53 -0800

23 lines

Job Announcement - Records Manager - Washington D.C. Area

Rachel Ban <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:37:22 -0500

87 lines

Job Posting - Little Rock AR

Sherry Owen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:01:21 -0500

32 lines

Job Posting: Records Analyst, Toronto

Wolfe, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:32:24 -0500

123 lines

KUDOS was Re: [RM] Construction of Archival Building - Brief for Architects

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:19:32 -0500

42 lines

Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:21:00 -0800

38 lines

Re: Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:37:32 -0500

42 lines

Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:21:00 -0800

53 lines

Re: Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:17:22 -0800

38 lines

Legal Hold Orders

Zengel, Rikki <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:55:56 -0500

41 lines

Re: Legal Hold Orders

Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:53:02 -0500

61 lines

Re: Legal Hold Orders

Zengel, Rikki <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:51:29 -0500

67 lines

Re: Legal Hold Orders

McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:14:28 -0600

50 lines

Re: Legal Hold Orders

Barbara Wyton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:13:48 -0500

30 lines

Re: Legal Hold Orders

Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:17:29 -0500

121 lines

Re: Legal Hold Orders

Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:24:26 -0500

94 lines

Re: Legal Hold Orders

Deidre Paknad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:42:54 -0500

86 lines

Re: Legal Hold Orders

Manning, Patricia L (Patti) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:40:06 -0600

85 lines

Re: Legal Hold Orders

Foster, Christopher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:48:16 -0600

68 lines

Linda Perry

Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:01:12 -0600

23 lines

Marlene Diamond is out of the office.

Marlene Diamond <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:11:17 -0500

17 lines

Memory of the World Online Survey

Luciana Duranti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:07:19 -0800

84 lines

New blog post - New Orleans Notarial Archives

Russell D. James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:48:35 -0600

69 lines

Re: New blog post - New Orleans Notarial Archives

Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:16:28 -0500

45 lines

New Edgerton Files story posted

Russell D. James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:15:28 -0600

78 lines

New Information Nation Edition is Available

Nystedt, Sheri <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:26:44 -0700

46 lines

Re: New Information Nation Edition is Available

Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:14:10 -0800

65 lines

New York Times article on Digital Archivists

James Cassedy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:07:31 -0500

32 lines

Re: New York Times article on Digital Archivists

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:41:33 -0800

48 lines

Re: New York Times article on Digital Archivists (UNCLASSIFIED)

Tyler, Judy K Ms CIV USA MEDCOM CRDAMC <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:33:25 -0600

63 lines

Now OT - RE: [RM] South Carolina ARMA Chapters Joint Seminar - March 18

Colgan, Julie J. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:07:04 -0500

29 lines

Re: Now OT - RE: [RM] South Carolina ARMA Chapters Joint Seminar - March 18

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:18:41 -0700

26 lines

Re: Now OT - South Carolina ARMA Chapters Joint Seminar - March 18

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:18:40 -0600

28 lines

OT - Foxit Reader Difficulties

Jon Quandt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:42:22 -0500

37 lines

Re: OT - Foxit Reader Difficulties

Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:39:58 -0500

72 lines

Re: OT - Foxit Reader Difficulties

Jon Quandt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:58:53 -0500

96 lines

Re: OT - Foxit Reader Difficulties

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:55:45 -0500

35 lines

Re: OT - Foxit Reader Difficulties

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:04:23 -0700

21 lines

Re: OT - Foxit Reader Difficulties

Jon Quandt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:28:48 -0500

71 lines

Plant Closing Process

Mario Rieger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:53:24 -0500

35 lines

Re: Plant Closing Process

Mario Rieger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:16:00 -0500

55 lines

Question about Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Retention

Carrie Fager <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:57:10 -0600

39 lines

Re: Question about Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Retention

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:08:08 -0500

47 lines

Re: Question about Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Retention

deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:11:23 -0500

52 lines

Re: Question about Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Retention

Christian Meinke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:59:58 -0800

53 lines

Re: Question about Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Retention

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:08:08 -0500

62 lines

RAIN 20090202 CyberCemetery, MS IP Theft, Offline Gmail, Ephemera, Compliance

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:47:55 -0500

285 lines

RainDrip: NARA and Digital Records

Piotrowski, Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:06:07 -0500

22 lines

Re: RainDrip: NARA and Digital Records

Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:49:33 -0500

29 lines

RAINDrop - World's Greatest Hacker Says Obama's BlackBerry Can Be Breached

Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:12:20 -0800

35 lines

Raindrop: MS Exchange alternative unveiled

Colgan, Julie J. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:14:41 -0500

49 lines

Retention Coding System

Lori Calovich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:57:19 -0600

36 lines

Re: Retention Coding System

Cindy Zuvich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:58:08 -0800

65 lines

RIM Month?

Rich Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:37:54 -0700

32 lines

Re: RIM Month?

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:03:09 -0500

29 lines

Re: RIM Month?

Stephanie Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:11:32 -0600

37 lines

Set No Mail

Kathy Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:57:03 -0500

21 lines

SharePoint search: Good enough for the enterprise?

Jean Graef <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 07:23:32 -0800

30 lines

South Carolina ARMA Chapters Joint Seminar - March 18

Colgan, Julie J. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:49:40 -0500

86 lines

Re: South Carolina ARMA Chapters Joint Seminar - March 18

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:08:29 -0800

35 lines

Spring Seminar in Denver

Chris Ames <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:53:03 -0700

43 lines

Thank you - Consultation estimate

Mary McKay <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:16:24 -0800

41 lines

Twitter group for archivists and records managers

Russell D. James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:05:49 -0600

69 lines

Re: Twitter group for archivists and records managers

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:46:14 -0500

36 lines

University Records Management Benchmarking

Vandenberg, Erin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:41:44 -0600

41 lines

Re: University Records Management Benchmarking

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:51:48 -0700

28 lines

Re: University Records Management Benchmarking

Westlund, Dawn Cheryl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:24:22 -0500

31 lines

Versatile Retention software from Zasio

Davis Baxley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:22:41 -0500

68 lines

Re: Versatile Retention software from Zasio

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:05:22 -0500

75 lines

Re: Versatile Retention software from Zasio

bobd <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:01:50 -0800

51 lines

Re: Versatile Retention software from Zasio

Bartholomew, John C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:09:43 -0500

81 lines

Re: Versatile Retention software from Zasio

Acevedo, Alex <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:41:20 -0800

46 lines

Re: Versatile Retention software from Zasio

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:15:16 -0500

42 lines

What is Cloud Computing, really?

Colgan, Julie J. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:04:32 -0500

51 lines

Re: What is Cloud Computing, really?

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:26:48 -0500

43 lines

Re: What is Cloud Computing, really?

Colgan, Julie J. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:17:47 -0500

34 lines

Re: What is Cloud Computing, really?

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:53:36 -0800

21 lines


Back to: Main RECMGMT-L Page



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager