LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for RECMGMT-L Archives


RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives


February 2009, Week 3


Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Search Archives


Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

A Place for Records/Information Managers

Alice Young <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:35:05 -0500

49 lines

Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers

Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:22:41 -0800

28 lines

Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:33:33 -0500

22 lines

Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:01:43 -0800

16 lines

Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers

Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:03:13 -0600

69 lines

Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers

Trudy M Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:53:44 EST

104 lines

Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers

Cindy Zuvich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:09:01 -0800

92 lines

Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers

Angie Fares <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:34:00 -0600

22 lines

Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers

sasha babin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:31:02 -0800

58 lines

ARMA 2009 Election Results

PeterK <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:27:39 -0500

68 lines

Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results

Starck, Brian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:22:55 -0700

27 lines

Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:36:52 -0700

37 lines

Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results

Barbara Wyton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:08:59 -0500

31 lines

Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:40:49 -0500

36 lines

Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results

Bill Benedon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:51:34 EST

32 lines

Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:01:20 -0500

28 lines

Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results

Alice Young <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:05:00 -0500

47 lines

Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results

Bill Benedon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:10:34 EST

22 lines

Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results

Rich Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:40:17 -0700

88 lines

Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results

John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:01:23 -0500

28 lines

Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:28:31 -0600

53 lines

Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:58:45 -0800

33 lines

Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results

Bill Benedon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:07:02 EST

25 lines

Re: ARMA 2009 Election Results

JFrost <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:01:05 -0600

116 lines

Re: ARMA 2009, period

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:22:02 -0500

71 lines

Re: ARMA 2009, period

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:08:54 -0800

30 lines

ARMA International Elections End TODAY!

JFrost <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:07:20 -0600

35 lines

Barracuda Message Archiver

Joan Brunning-Symons <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:05:39 -0600

32 lines

By David L. Harris http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/education/x679399496/State-says-Cambridge-Public-Schools-cant-charge-14K-for-public-records

don warner saklad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:03:35 -0500

17 lines

Re: Classifying Records Management

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:58:28 -0500

36 lines

Re: Consultation estimate

Christopher Varlack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:56:32 -0400

37 lines

Definition of a Record

Bartholomew, John C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:22:04 -0500

40 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Chrosniak, Danielle M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:26:08 -0500

69 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:32:20 -0500

64 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:33:12 -0600

51 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Trudy M Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:31:38 EST

31 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Stephen Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:37:44 -0500

37 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:43:01 -0700

23 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Wilson, Jeffery <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:57:35 -0500

45 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Garrison, Linda - ARA <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:32:01 -0600

108 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Brenda Parnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:40:15 -0500

88 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Joe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:15:55 -0800

83 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Susan Beamer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:26:22 -0800

114 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Alice Young <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:34:43 -0500

39 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Millican & Associates, Inc. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:49:07 -0500

42 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Marge Sroka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:59:27 -0800

16 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:14:35 -0800

59 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:43:52 -0500

26 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Bartholomew, John C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:54:32 -0500

68 lines

Re: Definition of a Record

Frank Addamo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:48:59 -0800

79 lines

FACT Act Red Flag Rules and Records Management

McLemore, Dustin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:00:26 -0600

67 lines

Re: FACT Act Red Flag Rules and Records Management

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:01:31 -0500

37 lines

Re: FACT Act Red Flag Rules and Records Management

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:04:08 -0500

37 lines

Re: FACT Act Red Flag Rules and Records Management

Christian Meinke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:25:33 -0800

119 lines

Fees for Service

Tuckett, David <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:31:19 -0800

28 lines

Re: Fees for Service

Allen, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:47:47 -0400

60 lines

Re: Fees for Service

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:36:04 -0600

37 lines

Re: Fees for Service

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:05:30 -0500

44 lines

FW: CRM Seminar - 6 or more participants needed

Cristina Roffee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:15:43 -0800

49 lines

FW: Time Tip-Success Diary

Stephanie Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:52:38 -0600

46 lines

FW: [RM] Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...

Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:21:48 -0500

90 lines

Re: FW: [RM] Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:55:45 -0500

63 lines

Re: FW: [RM] Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...

Link, Gary M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:14:30 -0500

59 lines

Re: FW: [RM] Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...

deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:16:55 -0500

139 lines

FW: [RM] Set No Mail

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:42:48 -0600

39 lines

Re: FW: [RM] Set No Mail

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:58:05 -0500

59 lines

HIPAA Related: Resolution Agreement with CVS Pharmacy, Inc.

Westlund, Dawn Cheryl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:38:23 -0500

106 lines

InnoCielo

Linda Buss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:43:53 +0000

25 lines

Job Announcement - Two Archivist Positions, NARA, Laguna Niguel, CA

Cathy Westfeldt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:43:06 -0800

42 lines

Job Posting US-FL-Fort Myers CRM preferred

PeterK <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:46:31 -0500

22 lines

Kimberley A Luff is out of the office.

Kimberley A Luff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:01:06 -0500

18 lines

Kimberley A Luff is out of the office.

Kimberley A Luff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:49:22 -0500

18 lines

Re: Legal Hold Orders

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:08:06 -0500

24 lines

LinkedIn

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:37:33 -0800

29 lines

Re: LinkedIn

JFrost <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 06:58:54 -0600

71 lines

Re: LinkedIn

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:40:49 -0500

48 lines

Re: LinkedIn

Trudy M Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:05:25 EST

77 lines

Re: LinkedIn

Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:33:36 -0800

35 lines

Mainframe Computer Service

Mary R. Ott <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:02:57 -0600

41 lines

Re: Mainframe Computer Service

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:36:00 -0500

47 lines

Re: Mainframe Computer Service

Tom Utiger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:59:53 -0800

38 lines

Re: Mainframe Computer Service (Problems)

Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:36:42 -0500

47 lines

Re: Mainframe Computer Service (Problems)

Jay Maechtlen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:49:06 -0800

74 lines

Re: Mainframe Computer Service (Problems)

Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:53:24 -0500

63 lines

Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...

Debbie Wolf <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:04:49 -0500

49 lines

Re: Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:05:35 -0500

104 lines

Media Type Requirements?

Greene, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:07:58 -0600

84 lines

Re: Media Type Requirements?

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:47:10 -0500

80 lines

Re: Media Type Requirements?

Greene, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:14:13 -0600

32 lines

Mixed Messages in Marble

Russell D. James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:29:47 -0600

73 lines

NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:04:40 -0600

59 lines

Re: NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

Hilliard, Mary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:44:48 -0600

33 lines

Re: NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

Pat Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:05:31 -0500

62 lines

Re: NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:56:51 -0600

36 lines

Re: now OT OT [RM] Media Type Requirements - or Paper vs. Plastic...

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:14:48 -0800

44 lines

Re: Plant Closing Process

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:15:05 -0500

29 lines

Process-Focused Retention Schedule

deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:04:06 -0500

78 lines

Re: Question about Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and Retention

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:48:36 -0500

31 lines

Re: RAIN - Sign of the Times

Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:27:50 -0500

44 lines

Re: RAIN - Sign of the Times

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:04:05 -0500

34 lines

Re: RAIN - Sign of the Times

Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:13:01 -0500

51 lines

Re: RAIN - Sign of the Times

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:15:18 -0500

42 lines

RAIN 20090204 Espionage, spoliation, wiped, data losses

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:50:01 -0500

267 lines

RAIN 20090206 Deed Loss, Server Wiped, Data breaches, Redaction tool

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:42:59 -0500

317 lines

RAIN 20090209 Digital Archivists, backup system, record tampering probed

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:26:45 -0500

109 lines

RAINdrop White House documents missing

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:38:56 -0500

37 lines

RAINDrop: Produce the Note

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:57:18 -0800

24 lines

RAINDrop: The Diamondback Online - Natl. archivist becomes professor

Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:21:14 -0500

32 lines

Receive 5.5 ICRM Certification Maintenance Program (CMP) credits

Angela Tayfun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:26:26 -0500

88 lines

Record Retention and the Lily Ledbetter Act

deMarteleire, Margaret <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:18:21 -0500

96 lines

Re: Record Retention and the Lily Ledbetter Act

Starck, Brian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:46:18 -0700

65 lines

Re: Record Retention and the Lily Ledbetter Act

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:50:06 -0800

53 lines

Report on Preservation and Access for Scientific Data

Mark Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:52:41 -0500

43 lines

RIM Month

John Frost <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:53:07 +0000

28 lines

SAA, Ethical Codes, & Present Potential and Real Problems

Russell D. James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:21:14 -0600

73 lines

Re: Set No Mail

Brian Litster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:22:38 -0700

15 lines

Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - suggestion as to How to gain formal recognition of the profession

Tom Dale <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:33:08 -0500

138 lines

Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

JFrost <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:05:11 -0600

94 lines

Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

Pat Franks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:42:39 -0500

32 lines

Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:09:04 -0800

50 lines

Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:39:52 -0800

28 lines

Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

Patrick Cunningham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:55:08 -0800

28 lines

Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

Hilliard, Mary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:58:20 -0600

26 lines

Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:01:01 -0800

34 lines

Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

bobd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:09:09 -0800

91 lines

Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:23:41 -0500

35 lines

Re: SOC Classification for Records Manager - WAS NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:30:42 -0800

32 lines

THANK-YOU!! -- RE: ARMA 2009 Election Results

Records Management <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:41:05 -1000

119 lines

WAS Re: A Place for Records/Information Managers NOW How to gain formal recognition of the profession

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:39:44 -0500

66 lines

When PDFs Attack - Acrobat [Reader] 0-Day On the Loose

Alan A Andolsen CMC CRM <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:23:29 -0500

40 lines


Back to: Main RECMGMT-L Page



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager