LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for RECMGMT-L Archives


RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives


May 2009, Week 3


Options:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents
Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Search Archives


Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Computerized health records keep crashing

sasha babin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 09:12:25 -0700

25 lines

Contract for Services

Levita High <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 11:56:50 -0400

17 lines

Re: Contract for Services

John Glover <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 09:08:31 -0800

47 lines

Re: Contract for Services

Bernard Chester <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 12:23:30 -0700

68 lines

Digital Preservation – The Planets Way: 22-24 June 2009, Royal Library Copenhagen, Denmark

Planets Project News Update <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 09:58:13 GMT

79 lines

E-mail Archiving - an Free Eforum Webinar

Andy Potter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 12:10:08 -0400

83 lines

Re: E-mail Archiving - an Free Eforum Webinar

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 13:17:04 -0400

66 lines

Everything is a record until it is not

Manago, William M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 09:55:44 -0400

48 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 10:12:49 -0400

36 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 10:51:26 -0400

27 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 10:48:11 -0500

44 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 09:11:05 -0700

20 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

bobd <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 09:19:36 -0700

86 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 10:27:50 -0600

43 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 10:36:00 -0600

48 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 13:31:36 -0400

85 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Manago, William M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 13:35:28 -0400

109 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 13:42:36 -0400

34 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Manago, William M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 13:48:33 -0400

31 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

RIMMAN <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 10:58:38 -0700

149 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 12:07:10 -0600

38 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 14:17:25 -0400

37 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Manago, William M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 14:18:31 -0400

79 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 14:32:38 -0400

119 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Gordon Hoke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 13:47:11 -0500

34 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Sanderson, Glen (Swift Technology) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 20:02:08 +0100

18 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 13:11:28 -0600

48 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 16:03:39 -0400

44 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 16:15:44 -0400

40 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 13:14:28 -0700

37 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 13:17:33 -0700

36 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 16:24:26 -0400

55 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 15:05:50 -0600

73 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 14:07:08 -0700

24 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 14:20:21 -0700

64 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 13:46:22 -0700

39 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 15:34:25 -0700

44 lines

Re: Everything is a record until it is not

Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 21:52:43 -0400

58 lines

Re: Everything is a record, now: Calendars

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 16:22:34 -0700

31 lines

FW: RE: Records and Information Technicians

Camarda, Amy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 13:22:14 -0400

37 lines

Re: FW: RE: Records and Information Technicians

sasha babin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 11:37:58 -0700

65 lines

Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 11:55:02 -0700

175 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...

Allan, Liz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 14:34:03 -0500

281 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...

Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 12:43:27 -0700

58 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 16:10:53 -0400

35 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...

Allan, Liz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 15:11:09 -0500

94 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 13:20:38 -0700

363 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 16:29:33 -0400

34 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: [RM] RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 14:49:06 -0700

37 lines

Introduction and Questions

Ward Fennell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 May 2009 14:01:03 -0500

49 lines

Re: Introduction and Questions

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 09:05:13 -0400

35 lines

Re: Introduction and Questions

Sharon Burnett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 07:48:32 -0700

39 lines

Re: Introduction and Questions

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 08:28:55 -0700

95 lines

Re: Introduction and Questions

Pilar McAdam <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 08:40:27 -0700

116 lines

Re: Introduction and Questions

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 11:49:13 -0400

23 lines

Re: Introduction and Questions

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 09:48:30 -0700

69 lines

Job opening - Records inventory project lead

Johnson Jr., Earl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 14:20:27 -0400

54 lines

JOB Posting US-CA-Santa Ana MGR Corporate Records CRM preferred

PeterK <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 09:34:52 -0400

61 lines

Re: JOB Posting US-CA-Santa Ana MGR Corporate Records CRM preferred

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 21 May 2009 13:55:59 +0000

23 lines

Migration from GroupWise to Outlook

Jennifer Winkler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 16:38:40 -0700

36 lines

Missing Files (UNCLASSIFIED)

Tyler, Judy K Ms CIV USA MEDCOM CRDAMC <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 12:58:15 -0500

33 lines

Re: Missing Files (UNCLASSIFIED)

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 15:33:26 -0400

41 lines

Re: Missing Files (UNCLASSIFIED)

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 13:01:17 -0700

46 lines

Re: Missing Files (UNCLASSIFIED)

John Milligan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 13:02:22 -0700

64 lines

Re: Missing Files (UNCLASSIFIED)

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 19:15:50 -0400

38 lines

OT-ing....Question on retention of software licenses

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 16:20:32 -0600

22 lines

Re: OT-ing....Question on retention of software licenses

Cooper, Dawn R. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 17:22:59 -0500

45 lines

Participate in Outsell's Information Management Benchmark Study!

Karen Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 15:11:08 -0500

74 lines

Re: Po-tay-to, Po-tah-toe; NOW: Context and cloud computing

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 10:45:11 -0700

58 lines

PowerPoint resources

Atle Skjekkeland <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 May 2009 10:05:57 -0400

29 lines

President's R&D Budget

Mark Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 16:12:12 -0400

51 lines

Question on retention of software licenses

Cooper, Dawn R. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 11:20:29 -0500

26 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 10:36:05 -0600

51 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 12:42:07 -0400

47 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

WALLIS Dwight D <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 09:42:28 -0700

37 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 10:01:00 -0700

39 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 10:09:43 -0700

19 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 13:33:45 -0400

65 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 14:09:24 -0400

53 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 11:09:49 -0700

58 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Cooper, Dawn R. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 13:15:22 -0500

75 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 11:31:13 -0700

55 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 15:12:25 -0400

43 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 14:09:58 -0600

48 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Cooper, Dawn R. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 15:29:32 -0500

74 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 14:03:24 -0700

70 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 15:18:06 -0600

69 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

John Milligan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 14:32:20 -0700

111 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Cooper, Dawn R. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 16:33:36 -0500

100 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 15:47:06 -0600

35 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 15:05:44 -0700

102 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 15:15:15 -0700

44 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 18:01:28 -0700

61 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 21:15:59 -0400

34 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Mark Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 06:15:01 -0700

133 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 07:33:02 -0600

46 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 09:59:25 -0400

41 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Mark Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 07:24:52 -0700

72 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 08:45:07 -0700

76 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 11:13:14 -0400

36 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 08:13:35 -0700

24 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 11:20:47 -0400

36 lines

Re: Question on retention of software licenses

Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 08:50:30 -0700

35 lines

RAIN Drop - Customer Information Files found in a dumpster

Starck, Brian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 16:48:53 -0600

36 lines

Re: RAIN Drop - Customer Information Files found in a dumpster

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 11:53:10 -0400

52 lines

Re: RAINdrip Update: Google accepts blame

Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 09:37:09 -0400

39 lines

Re: RAINdrip Update: Google accepts blame

Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 09:39:44 -0400

51 lines

RAINdrip: Public or Private Records?

Larry Medina <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 May 2009 10:00:36 -0700

27 lines

Re: RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...

Allan, Liz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 09:50:04 -0500

35 lines

Re: RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...

Jones, Virginia <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 11:05:08 -0400

26 lines

Re: RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...

Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 11:19:32 -0400

49 lines

RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...

Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 12:38:48 -0400

92 lines

Re: RAINdrip: When Google turns to Gobble-Gobble...

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 11:43:34 -0700

45 lines

RAINDrop - (c) 2009? Wishful Thinking, Perhaps, as Backlog Mounts

Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 08:39:46 -0700

30 lines

RAINDrop - Dragging health records into the Digital Age - cnet news

Tod Chernikoff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 14:58:09 -0400

31 lines

RAINDrop - IRS lax in destroying sensitive tax papers

Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 09:24:13 -0700

28 lines

Re: RAINDrop - IRS lax in destroying sensitive tax papers

McLallen, David <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 11:36:00 -0600

28 lines

RAINDrop - Microsoft Expected to Show New Search Engine Next Week

Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 15:54:07 -0700

23 lines

Re: RECMGMT-L Digest - 15 May 2009 to 16 May 2009 (#2009-132)

Su D. A. Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 May 2009 00:08:35 -0600

126 lines

Records Relevant and Records Produced for Litigation After Release of Hold

Tom Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 16:17:34 -0500

70 lines

Re: Records Relevant and Records Produced for Litigation After Release of Hold

Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 14:17:38 -0700

111 lines

Re: Records Relevant and Records Produced for Litigation After Release of Hold

Furlow, Brad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 15:34:20 -0600

131 lines

Re: Records Relevant and Records Produced for Litigation After Release of Hold

Julie Fleming <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 21:49:36 -0400

164 lines

Retention of IT license agreement.

sasha babin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 May 2009 11:35:03 -0700

34 lines

Retention Period for 'Client Registers and Lists'

Nemchek, Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 17:20:52 -0700

40 lines

Re: Retention Period for 'Client Registers and Lists'

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 17:33:09 -0700

77 lines

Re: Retention Period for 'Client Registers and Lists'

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 20:48:48 -0400

32 lines

Re: Retention Period for 'Client Registers and Lists'

Allen, Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 20:15:36 -0500

35 lines

The value of a GSA Listing (Off topic)

Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 12:55:11 -0400

50 lines

Re: The value of a GSA Listing (Off topic)

Cooper, Dawn R. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 12:22:25 -0500

80 lines

Re: The value of a GSA Listing (Off topic)

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 13:41:04 -0400

35 lines

Re: The value of a GSA Listing (Off topic)

Grevin, Fred <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 May 2009 14:31:31 -0400

40 lines

Re: The value of a GSA Listing (Off topic) (UNCLASSIFIED)

Tyler, Judy K Ms CIV USA MEDCOM CRDAMC <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 07:50:26 -0500

37 lines

Traction Software

Tucker, Sandra <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 May 2009 09:42:06 -0400

24 lines

Was: Everything is a record, now: Calendars

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 16:38:49 -0600

27 lines

Re: Was: Everything is a record, now: Calendars

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 16:25:22 -0700

46 lines

Re: Was: Everything is a record, now: Calendars

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 20:07:42 -0400

38 lines

Re: Was: Everything is a record, now: Calendars

Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 18:27:48 -0600

27 lines

Re: Was: Everything is a record, now: Calendars

Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 17:45:46 -0700

64 lines

Re: Was: Everything is a record, now: Calendars

Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 May 2009 21:04:44 -0400

36 lines

Workshop on Preservation of Complex Engineering Data Presentations Available

Mark Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 May 2009 12:28:01 -0400

53 lines


Back to: Main RECMGMT-L Page



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager