Skip repetitive navigational links
View: Next message | Previous More Hitsmessage
Next in topic | Previous More Hitsin topic
Next by same author | Previous More Hitsby same author
Previous page (January 2014) | Back to main LRNASST-L page
Join or leave LRNASST-L (or change settings)
Reply | Post a new message
Search
Log in
Options:   Chronologically | Most recent first
Proportional font | Non-proportional font

Subject:

Re: guidelines and ethics online homework

From:

Sara Weertz <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Open Forum for Learning Assistance Professionals <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:28:18 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (269 lines)

Interesting observations, Marcia. At Angelo State, we see quite the opposite with online work. If I may, I like to present another twist to this conversation and talk about online quizzes, using College Algebra as an example. College Algebra has one of the highest DFW rates on our campus-in some years as high as 60%. Many students struggle in College Algebra, not just the less proficient. Faculty struggle as well to help students succeed in this core course. Almost all of the math instructors offer weekly quizzes, which is a promising practice-assessing students early and often. Some faculty offer weekly online quizzes with multiple attempts. Students can take and retake the weekly online quiz until they get the grade they want. What we have witnessed, however, is students will take the weekly online quiz, get a low passing grade on the first attempt, and then submit their grade. There is no incentive or push to try to do better or put forth more effort for a better grade. Unfortunately, this scenario continues for eight weeks, at when point the students bomb the midterm. They seem genuinely surprised they did not do better on the major exam.



I keep hearing Kay and Bryon McClenney's words in my head: "Students don't do optional." If we know something is important and will help students succeed, we have to create a mandate. Easier said than done. In examining the guidelines and ethics of online work, the burden is on us to show students not only what they need to do and how to do it,  but why the online work is important to the learning process. Using the Socratic Method, tutors and SI leaders should be trained to offer guidance in critical thinking-getting students to use new knowledge to solve problems as opposed to simply answering a question or plugging in an answer.



sal

Sara Weertz, M.Ed.
Executive Director, First Year Experience
ASU Station #10915
Angelo State University
San Angelo, TX  76909
(325) 942-2595
[log in to unmask]

CRLA President-Elect 2013-2014
www.crla.net<http://www.crla.net>





-----Original Message-----
From: Open Forum for Learning Assistance Professionals [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Marcia Toms
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 1:31 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: guidelines and ethics online homework



Long post warning!  Must be using typing to keep my fingers warm :)



Hi Jane,



Ah the joys of online homework.  On one hand, it "makes" students do their homework because each assignment is grades (as opposed to written homework which may be spot checked or never graded).  And it gives instant feedback, which should be great.  On the other hand, it's presenting a whole new set of challenges.  Before I get specifically into how I talk to tutors, I want to set up how I see students and faculty are using online homework at least at NCSU (the home of webassign... talk about eating your own dog food :)



Most science and math gen ed courses here use some sort of online homework.

A few departments even mandate it for certain courses.  Faculty encourage students to work on assignments together to figure out the material.  Most courses have multiple submissions with little to no penalty for using the multiple submissions (sometimes students get 10 submissions for a multiple choice question with 4 possible answers).  Many questions also come directly from textbooks, but with certain numbers randomized so the student has to "crunch" his or her own numbers.  Some faculty have homework due regularly each week, some have a large amount due right before a test.



What I notice about students:



1) The instant feedback and the clear grading makes students very, very focused on getting all their webassign points.  Homework becomes a goal, not the path to a goal.  They will spend hours talking to everyone they can about how to figure out a single problem.  From my perspective, there is a large opportunity cost spent on getting what amounts to 0.1% of their final grade.  Time that could be spent understanding fundamentals (or even getting sleep) is spent hunting around, copying other people's solutions and trying to adapt their own numbers.



2) Students use whatever resources they can find.  Students have access to their notes and book.  They also compare solutions to peers.  And entering in a few phrases of text of a physics problem in google will supply students with a lot of worked out solutions.



3) The instant feedback/multiple submissions creates a culture where students will just try things.  Didn't get the right answer for a physics problem, try changing the sign, or use sine instead of cosine.  I know working backwards from a solution is a time honored learning strategy (one that I have employed myself) but the quick feedback seems to make it move faster, and I don't see much reflection after figuring out the right answer.



In my dissertation research (excuse the shameless self-promotion), both the higher and lower achievers all used resources available to them (textbooks, notes, peers, internet).  There were two main differences: 1) the lower achievers tended to equate homework with studying and 2) the lower achievers were less accurate in their assessments of their knowledge.



The 100/100 homework grades gave the lower achievers a false sense of knowledge, and they lacked the metacognitive awareness to remind them 1) they used a whole lot of resources when earning that 100 and 2) that doing it once (using all those resources) doesn't mean that they can do it again on their own, in a timed/stressful environment.



So, when I talk to tutors about online homework, here's where I start:

1) I share these observations with the tutors.  Get them to think about how they complete their homework (especially ask them to compare/contrast online homework in a class they "care" about with one they don't).  And we encourage tutors to talk to students about the challenges... "That's great you got this.  [Next time I see you/in a couple of days], try this [similar problem] to make sure that you can do it on your own without any help (from me or your notes)."



2) In semester long tutoring relationships, I stress going over concepts first.  Talking through what was covered in lecture, trying to rework a sample problem, covered up, annotating it so they have more complete notes, etc...  After a while, if the student is clearly doing that on her own, they may shorten that section and move to difficult homework.  Even in drop-in or less regular sessions, tutors start by asking about concepts or what the student already knows.  Often, they end up reviewing/practicing more basic material that the student hasn't grasped.



3) If tutors feel it's appropriate to work on a homework problem, the student should already have attempted the homework (significantly... show me your work).



4) Sometimes, tutors need to help on specific online problems (not just a similar one).  Because the "trick" of the problem can't get modeled any other way.  I see this a lot in physics where the student needs help getting the picture correct from the words.  The tutor uses Socractic questioning to help the student piece together the picture herself.



5) Tutors are good about not rushing after a problem is complete.  The tutors often get the student to summarize the process, the difficult parts, what they need to memorize, etc...



Sorry so long, homework is obviously a bee in my bonnet :) -Marcia NC State University



On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Jane Neuburger <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:



> Happy New Year to all colleagues!

>

> I've just searched the archives, looking for a discussion or thread

> regarding guidelines and ethics for tutors working with online

> homework assignments.  Beyond our "usual" guidelines (thank you, CRLA

> and ATP; http://www.crla.net/ittpc/code_of_ethics.htm and

> http://www.myatp.org/about/410-2/), have we had, as an organization, a

> discussion on what guidelines to provide for tutors who work with

> students in the online homework world?  May I invite comments on this,

> please?  I'm hoping to have one of my Level III tutors present a

> workshop on this, and he'd love your commentary.

>

> Here's what we face at Syracuse:  I've talked  with department chairs

> in the sciences and in mathematics.  Several of our science

> departments are using Mastering Biology and Mastering Chemistry (Pearson products).

>  Homework generally counts for between 10-20% of the grade, although this

> is always at the discretion  of faculty.   When homework existed in the

> textbooks, a number of faculty and departments asked that tutors work

> on the similar problem sets, not the exact homework sets.  This is no

> longer possible in at least some of the online sets.  Our department

> chairs have asked that at least, the tutors do not "do" the homework

> and that they direct students to finding the answers in notes or text.

> So, that's what we are doing.

> So, let me start a list of rather unfinished statements.  Please add,

> change, edit!  And, thanks in advance.

>

> 1). We have discovered that it's better to have students double-check

> their answers before submitting (you earn progressively fewer points

> when you do not get it right on the first try).  This is a variation

> on what students seem to be familiar with in the online game

> environment of "click and if it doesn't work, go back again".

> 2).  Tutors must not do the online, but rather, redirect to the text

> and notes.

> 3).  When or if a student is stuck in an online question. . . .

> 4).  Tutors may demonstrate similar problems before a student attempts

> the online question.  Tutors must always refer back to the students'

> notes and/or text.

>

> Cheers,

> Jane Neuburger

> Director, Tutoring & Study Center

> Syracuse University

> 111 Waverly Avenue Suite 220

> Syracuse NY 13244

> Main Campus 315.443.2005

> Stevenson Room 105E; 315.443.9942

> Fax: 315.443.5160

> www.tutoring.syr.edu<http://www.tutoring.syr.edu/<http://www.tutoring.syr.edu%3chttp:/www.tutoring.syr.edu/>>

>

> Nationally Certified Tutoring Center; CRLA Level III

>

>

>

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your

> subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web

> browser to http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html

>

> To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

>







--

Marcia Toms, Ph.D.

Associate Director

Undergraduate Tutorial Center

Division of Academic and Student Affairs North Carolina State University Campus Box 7118 / 101 Park Shops Raleigh, NC 27695-7118

919.513.7829

http://www.ncsu.edu/tutorial_center/



Public Record Reminder: All electronic mail messages in connection with State business that are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public Records Law.  They are retained and may be disclosed to third parties.



Confidentiality: Nothing in the NC Public Records Law diminishes the privacy protections afforded by federal law (e.g., FERPA, HIPAA, etc.)



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web browser to http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html



To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your
subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web browser to
http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html

To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
January 2011
December 2010, Week 5
December 2010, Week 4
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 2
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 5
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
November 2010, Week 1
October 2010, Week 5
October 2010, Week 4
October 2010, Week 3
October 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 1
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 4
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5
August 2010, Week 4
August 2010, Week 3
August 2010, Week 2
August 2010, Week 1
July 2010, Week 5
July 2010, Week 4
July 2010, Week 3
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010, Week 1
June 2010, Week 5
June 2010, Week 4
June 2010, Week 3
June 2010, Week 2
June 2010, Week 1
May 2010, Week 4
May 2010, Week 3
May 2010, Week 2
May 2010, Week 1
April 2010, Week 5
April 2010, Week 4
April 2010, Week 3
April 2010, Week 2
April 2010, Week 1
March 2010, Week 5
March 2010, Week 4
March 2010, Week 3
March 2010, Week 2
March 2010, Week 1
February 2010, Week 4
February 2010, Week 3
February 2010, Week 2
February 2010, Week 1
January 2010, Week 5
January 2010, Week 4
January 2010, Week 3
January 2010, Week 2
January 2010, Week 1
December 2009, Week 5
December 2009, Week 4
December 2009, Week 3
December 2009, Week 2
December 2009, Week 1
November 2009, Week 5
November 2009, Week 4
November 2009, Week 3
November 2009, Week 2
November 2009, Week 1
October 2009, Week 5
October 2009, Week 4
October 2009, Week 3
October 2009, Week 2
October 2009, Week 1
September 2009, Week 5
September 2009, Week 4
September 2009, Week 3
September 2009, Week 2
September 2009, Week 1
August 2009, Week 5
August 2009, Week 4
August 2009, Week 3
August 2009, Week 2
August 2009, Week 1
July 2009, Week 5
July 2009, Week 4
July 2009, Week 3
July 2009, Week 2
July 2009, Week 1
June 2009, Week 5
June 2009, Week 4
June 2009, Week 3
June 2009, Week 2
June 2009, Week 1
May 2009, Week 5
May 2009, Week 4
May 2009, Week 3
May 2009, Week 2
May 2009, Week 1
April 2009, Week 5
April 2009, Week 4
April 2009, Week 3
April 2009, Week 2
April 2009, Week 1
March 2009, Week 5
March 2009, Week 4
March 2009, Week 3
March 2009, Week 2
March 2009, Week 1
February 2009, Week 4
February 2009, Week 3
February 2009, Week 2
February 2009, Week 1
January 2009, Week 5
January 2009, Week 4
January 2009, Week 3
January 2009, Week 2
January 2009, Week 1
December 2008, Week 5
December 2008, Week 4
December 2008, Week 3
December 2008, Week 2
December 2008, Week 1
November 2008, Week 5
November 2008, Week 4
November 2008, Week 3
November 2008, Week 2
November 2008, Week 1
October 2008, Week 5
October 2008, Week 4
October 2008, Week 3
October 2008, Week 2
October 2008, Week 1
September 2008, Week 5
September 2008, Week 4
September 2008, Week 3
September 2008, Week 2
September 2008, Week 1
August 2008, Week 5
August 2008, Week 4
August 2008, Week 3
August 2008, Week 2
August 2008, Week 1
July 2008, Week 5
July 2008, Week 4
July 2008, Week 3
July 2008, Week 2
July 2008, Week 1
June 2008, Week 5
June 2008, Week 4
June 2008, Week 3
June 2008, Week 2
June 2008, Week 1
May 2008, Week 5
May 2008, Week 4
May 2008, Week 3
May 2008, Week 2
May 2008, Week 1
April 2008, Week 5
April 2008, Week 4
April 2008, Week 3
April 2008, Week 2
April 2008, Week 1
March 2008, Week 5
March 2008, Week 4
March 2008, Week 3
March 2008, Week 2
March 2008, Week 1
February 2008, Week 5
February 2008, Week 4
February 2008, Week 3
February 2008, Week 2
February 2008, Week 1
January 2008, Week 5
January 2008, Week 4
January 2008, Week 3
January 2008, Week 2
January 2008, Week 1
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager