***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org *****
<<<-------- Zachary P Neal-------->>>
> ***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org *****
> I certainly agree that it typically makes sense to log distances.
> But, I'm curious about your rationale for using log10 rather than loge
> (natural log), which seems more common. I don't think I've ever seen
> a comparison or an argument about which transformation is more
> appropriate when predicting interaction as a function of distance, but
> perhaps this work is out there.
It should be irrelevant since the values are linearly related
log10 x = log10 e * ln x
Vladimir Batagelj, University of Ljubljana, FMF, Department of Mathematics
Jadranska 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social
network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send
an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line
UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.