Funny, I recall a similar discussion sprang up on this list last year. I was
one of the few arguing in favor of academics providing support to the U.S.
military. Several of those opposed to cooperation with the military argued
that those of us characterizing the terrorists and their sympathizers as
evil were painting too black and white a picture. Some time soon after I
posted links and excerpts to three articles addressing this point: one
explaining what the war is about from the Muslim fundamentalists' point of
view, one critiquing the "it's just not black and white" point of view, and
one addressing the tepid response of academics to the new wave of patriotism
sweeping the U.S.
The next morning Stan Wasserman sent me an email which read: "Please, take
these and similar email notes elsewhere. This has nothing to do with
Can someone provide some parameters for what defines acceptable commentary
this time around?
Charles G. Koch Foundation
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Friedman [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday,August 15,2002 7:58 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Social Network Research Partners
> I for one have ethical qualms about working for an organization whose
> stated aim is to kill people--and that performs this task rather often,
> and for purposes that further the economic degradation of human life all
> over the world and also contribute to the ecological crisis.
> As one of the people whose offices were destroyed on September 11, I
> also object to the fact that they often claim to do this in the names of
> my murdered building-mates--even though the policies and interests they
> defend are the same as those they did before that date.
> How do others feel?
> Sam Friedman
> National Development and Research Institutes
> 71 West 23d Street
> New York, NY 10010
> 1 212 845 4467
> Fax 1 917 438 0894
> [log in to unmask]
> >>> "Paul A. Branson" <[log in to unmask]> 08/15/02 01:04 AM >>>
> To the social network community,
> We have recently won a contract with the Army to conduct scientific
> research and knowledge econometric analysis at several commands. One of
> the analysis tools we use is Social Network analysis. It started as a
> small project, but due to popularity of our approach has since expanded
> to a project that could span a large section of the Army.
> IMII is interested in collaborating with researchers interested in
> social network analysis.
> We have also developed a software instrument in C# to conduct a variety
> of social network analysis and econometrics. We are interested in
> learning about current metrics that could be incorporated with within
> this tool.
> If you are interested in collaborating with us on a US Army project,
> please contact me at: [log in to unmask] .
> The hub of the project is located near Tucson, Arizona.
> Edward Swanstrom
> Innovation Management Institute International (IMII)
> [log in to unmask]
> +1 520-731-3130