Patrick's project sounds intriguing and challenging. Waterworks is not
quite in the same league with space. We only have 6 GBs of server space
occupied by e-mail, although the role of the Records Manager in assisting
with a solution is recognized. 6 GBs of a 12 GB server is a lot of server
space for the e-mail of a small (370 employee) department in local
government. My budget request is driven by the lack of e-mail management by
the users - several of the biggest "never delete" users are in our "C" level
(we have one manager with over 9000 e-mails in their mailbox). Saying we
need to reduce e-mail storage because we occupy 6 gig does not seem to make
an impression. After all, "everyone knows that hard drive space is cheap."
Equating that to 2.1 million e-mails to be managed (usually involving manual
determination/deletion), sorted through for FOIA reponses, and produced for
a legal discovery makes the point in a more dramatic way.
I like the idea Bill had of including the clusters - I just wish I knew how
to do that. I'll have to do some more research.
(Virginia A. Jones, CRM)
Newport News Dept. of Public Utilities
Newport News, VA
[log in to unmask]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Cunningham [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 12:57 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Size of average e-mail
> While indicating that people are saving a zillion emails can be
> impressive, we found that measuring the total space consumed by email
> to be more impressive. The Email Management Project that I outlined in
> my presentation at ARMA in New Orleans showed very directly how
> management can influence overall costs of maintaining email. When we
> started the project just over a year ago, we had about 2.7
> terabytes of
> email. At the time, that was more storage space than our
> mainframes had
> in DASD. We set a target of a 10% reduction, which would have resulted
> in a $2.6 million annual savings to the organization (solely in backup
> media, devices and time). We actually reduced to 1.5 terabytes.
> (There's a whole lot more to the story and if you have the ARMA
> Proceedings you can read my white paper. This was not simply a sweep
> and destroy sort of project -- records management had a huge role.)
> The other impressive numbers were traffic. Indicating to management
> that 80,000 messages a day were going to and from the Internet -- and
> better than half of that traffic was personal (based upon the domain
> names of origin and destination addresses) -- also had an impact.
> The vast majority of our email contains attachments, which are clearly
> the bane of any email system. I suppose measuring the average size of
> email without attachments and then the average size with attachments
> would yield a target number that could be gained by limiting email to
> plain text with pointers to attachments stored in an EDMS.
> We are measuring email size right now, trying to figure out an optimal
> maximum limit -- we have had people attach the entire contents of a
> CD-ROM (650MB) to an email and try to send it out. That size of email
> (and apparently, anything greater than 30MB) will break the mail
> Pat Cunningham, CRM
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance