LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: Re: Fetal Heart Monitor Strips
From: [log in to unmask]
Reply-To:Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:53:46 EDT

text/plain (71 lines)

Okay, I'll jump in with a couple of naive questions:

    Why not scan the strips and/or microfilm them?

    Why can't these monitors create electronic files instead of strips?

    Why can't the monitors print on something other than paper they are
currently on?

    Up until a decade or so ago (maybe longer), everything a computer printed
out was on that green and white pin-fed printer paper.  When was the last
time you handed a report to a client on that kind of paper?  Electric adding
machines, electronic calculators with printouts and faxes used thermal paper, but
they don't use that paper anymore.  Is a thermal printer faster?  I just can't
believe that monitor manufacturers are hopelessly wed to this paper.


Ken Haller
Systems Analyst
Lorton, VA

In a message dated 10/18/2003 2:00:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> I was told the requirement in Texas and some other
> states is "life of
> the patient plus  20" so you might have different
> requirements
> depending on where the Health Organization is
> headquartered.

Yep, and then when the organization changes hands,
hope that the records are indexed well enough that
they'll be able to know what they have and how long
they've had it and need to keep it =)  But then again,
this IS Texas we're talking about...

> Plus there is an issue of the longevity of the
> strips as the folded
> type tend to bleed from strip to strip when kept in
> a humid warehouse
> and the strips begin to stick to themselves over
> longer requirements.

Humidity IS a concern for these, but heat is a greater
concern.  The "wet ink" type (recorded using a stylus
on regular paper with a graphed background) are
affected even more by humididty because they use a
water-based ink.

Same is true for any water-based ink records actually,
which is why it's important to ask your commercial
storage provider about the temperature and humidity
conditions in their facility, and ask to see if they
have records for a year (or more) when you're
evaluating providers.  Naturally, this is less
critical for two year records, but few companies send
short retention records off to storage.


List archives at
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main RECMGMT-L Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager