LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: Microsoft's 'Self destructing e-mail' - one more comment
From: "Howard, Catherine (JUS)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:52:00 -0500

text/plain (47 lines)

Dear List members
At Mr Gould's request ...

Love ya'all!

-----Original Message-----
From: Grahame Gould [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:54 PM
To: 'Howard, Catherine (JUS)'
Subject: RE: Microsoft's 'Self destructing e-mail' and response of line
to p m y posting

I think you should be putting your responses (the opinions below) on the
list serve.


-----Original Message-----
From: Howard, Catherine (JUS) [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 October 2003 22:58
To: 'Grahame Gould'
Subject: Microsoft's 'Self destructing e-mail'

Good feature for deleting transitory records.
Bad feature if it deletes official records before the official disposition
date outlined in the record's retention schedule.
But my understanding is that like many of the features - the IT or Systems
Admin people turn them on or off, purchase certain features and not
Let's all keep calm and ensure we have our response ready should anyone
suggest this feature for all electronic records.

And that is what makes the RM list and its people such a great thing.

List archives at
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main RECMGMT-L Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager