For general use, I have submitted an algorithm for generating scale-free
random networks as described by Albert-Lásló Barabási in ³Linked: The New
Science of Networks².
The algorithm is available for download at my open-source network algorithm
repository, at http://innovationinsight.com/combinatorium .
I also encourage anyone else to take this opportunity to share their
On 11/18/03 12:55 PM, "Bill Richards" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> ***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.sfu.ca/~insna/ *****
> A recent posting asked about generating a random network:
> "I would like to generate a random network, with a similar number of nodes and
> connection to the network I have created from field data, to compare the
> distance and clustering co-efficient of each. ... My network created from
> field data has no isolated nodes. However, when I ask Pajek to create a
> network with the same number of nodes and connections I get plenty of
> isolates, which apparently will not make a valid clustering co-efficient or
> distance comparison. ... Can anyone suggest a way of either generating a
> random network with a specified number of nodes and connections that has no
> isolates ... ?"
> This raises two new question:
> Is a "random" network still "random" if every node must have at least one
> connection to the rest of the network -- in other words, if it must have no
> isolates, or, perhaps, it must be connected (there must be a path from each
> node to every other node)?
> What does it mean for a network to be "random"?
> Duncan Watts gives a very clear presentation of this issue on pages 43 to 68
> of his excellent book Six Degrees: the science of a connected age.