Skip repetitive navigational links
View: Next message | Previous More Hitsmessage
Next in topic | Previous More Hitsin topic
Next by same author | Previous More Hitsby same author
Previous page (June 2005) | Back to main LRNASST-L page
Join or leave LRNASST-L (or change settings)
Reply | Post a new message
Search
Log in
Options:   Chronologically | Most recent first
Proportional font | Non-proportional font

Subject:

Re: Remedial Course Research

From:

"Materniak, Georgine" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Open Forum for Learning Assistance Professionals <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:52:09 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (193 lines)

Access the actual report at  http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11325.pdf

Georgine Materniak
Assistant Director and
Pitt Pathway Program Manager
University of Pittsburgh
Career Services
224 William Pitt Union
Pittsburgh, PA  15260
(412) 648-7142
[log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Open Forum for Learning Assistance Professionals
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sanders, Karla
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 9:47 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Remedial Course Research

Here's the text from the Chronicle.  You do need a password to get into
the articles:

Friday, June 17, 2005



Remedial Courses Increase Chances That Underprepared Students Will
Complete Their Degrees, Study Finds By DAVID GLENN


Remedial courses appear to improve poorly prepared college students'
odds of eventually completing a degree, two economists reported in a
working paper distributed last week.

The new study, which draws on data for more than 28,000 students who
entered public colleges and universities in Ohio in 1998, arrives at a
time when some state governments and university systems are debating the
cost-effectiveness of remedial programs. The Nevada Board of Regents,
for example, recently adopted a plan that will eliminate state subsidies
for remedial courses. Without the subsidies, students will have to pay
the full cost of such courses.

Scholars have generally found it difficult to estimate the effectiveness
of remedial courses. Few colleges rigorously evaluate their own
programs. Earlier studies have often found that students who take
remedial courses have worse grades and higher dropout rates than their
peers. But that in itself is no surprise, since remedial students
generally have weaker skills and high-school preparation than the
typical college student.

The challenge for researchers has been to find a valid apples-to-apples
comparison that can assess the experiences of students with roughly
equivalent skills and preparation. In other words: If Douglas and
Elizabeth enter college with identical C- high-school grades and
identical achievement-test scores, and Douglas begins college with
remedial courses in English and mathematics, is he likely to be better
off than Elizabeth in the long run?

The authors of the new paper -- Eric P. Bettinger, an assistant
professor of economics at Case Western Reserve University, and Bridget
Terry Long, an associate professor of education and economics at Harvard
University -- believe that they have solved the puzzle.

Their new study takes advantage of the fact that Ohio's public colleges
and universities have considerable discretion in setting their
remediation policies. Some institutions, for example, require students
who score worse than 580 on the verbal portion of the SAT to take
remedial writing courses. But other Ohio colleges use lower SAT-score
cutoffs -- in some cases, as low as 410. There is also similar variation
in the colleges' standards for high-school grade-point averages.

So a student in one corner of Ohio with a 2.1 high-school GPA and a
verbal SAT score of 520 might (hypothetically) enter a Dayton-area
community college and be required to take remedial courses in writing
and mathematics. Meanwhile, in Youngstown, a student with an identical
high-school record might enter the local community college and face no
such requirement. With a large enough number of such pairs, it becomes
possible to generalize about the effects of remedial courses.

The Ohio Board of Regents provided Mr. Bettinger and Ms. Long with data
on 28,376 students who entered public colleges in Ohio in 1998 (with
appropriate steps taken to prevent any student from being identified by
name). The two economists then developed a statistical model that
assesses the progress of the students through the spring-2003 semester.

The researchers were especially interested in a subgroup --
approximately 15,000 students -- whose high-school grades and test
scores were low enough that they would have been required to take
remedial courses at some Ohio colleges, but not so low that they would
have been required to take remedial courses at all 25 institutions
included in the study.

Among the students in that group, the researchers found that those who
took remedial courses in mathematics were 9.6 percent less likely to
drop out of college within five years than were students with similar
high-school preparation who did not take such courses.

Students who took remedial courses in English, the researchers found,
were 17.3 percent more likely to complete a bachelor's degree within
four years than were students with similar high-school preparation who
did not take such courses.

The students who took remedial courses in English were also 18.9 percent
less likely to transfer to a less-selective college than students in the
comparison group.

The authors note that their study has at least one important limitation.
Because of its methodology, the study reveals nothing about the
experiences of students whose high-school grades and test scores were so
low that all 25 public Ohio colleges would have required them to take
remedial courses.

Mr. Bettinger and Ms. Long's study has been presented at several
seminars, but has not yet completed a formal peer review. It was partly
financed by a grant from the Lumina Foundation. An abstract is available
on the Web site of the National Bureau of Economic Research. The full
paper may be purchased for $5 on the same site.


* * *
In a related study, the U.S. Education Department's National Center for
Education Statistics released a report on Thursday about the differing
outcomes between students who enroll in college right out of high school
and those who delay their enrollment, for economic or other reasons.

According to the report, "Waiting to Attend College: Undergraduates Who
Delay Their Postsecondary Enrollment," students who delay beginning
their postsecondary education are at a "significant disadvantage"
relative to those who go straight to college from high school, in terms
of how well prepared they are, how much they have to work to finance
their education, and so on.

Delayed matriculators also tend to be outperformed by their peers who do
not delay: 40 percent of delayed entrants earn some kind of
postsecondary credential, compared with 58 percent of immediate
entrants.


*********************************************************************
Karla Sanders, Ph.D.
Director, Center for Academic Support & Achievement Eastern Illinois
University 600 Lincoln Ave.
Charleston, IL  61920
[log in to unmask]
tel:  217-581-6056
fax:  217-581-7100
www.eiu.edu/~casa2000; www.eiu.edu/~assess

-----Original Message-----
From: Open Forum for Learning Assistance Professionals
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Susan Anker
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 7:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Remedial Course Research

Hi,

For the Chronicle article, did you type in
http://chronicle.com/daily/2005/06/2005061702n.htm  (the URL from David
Arendt's email)? When I did that, it asked for a password. What other
link did you use? Thanks very much.


> From: Winnie Cooke <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Open Forum for Learning Assistance Professionals
> <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:27:05 -0400
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Remedial Course Research
>
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your
subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web
browser to http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html

To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your
subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web
browser to http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html

To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your
subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web browser to
http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html

To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
January 2011
December 2010, Week 5
December 2010, Week 4
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 2
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 5
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
November 2010, Week 1
October 2010, Week 5
October 2010, Week 4
October 2010, Week 3
October 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 1
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 4
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5
August 2010, Week 4
August 2010, Week 3
August 2010, Week 2
August 2010, Week 1
July 2010, Week 5
July 2010, Week 4
July 2010, Week 3
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010, Week 1
June 2010, Week 5
June 2010, Week 4
June 2010, Week 3
June 2010, Week 2
June 2010, Week 1
May 2010, Week 4
May 2010, Week 3
May 2010, Week 2
May 2010, Week 1
April 2010, Week 5
April 2010, Week 4
April 2010, Week 3
April 2010, Week 2
April 2010, Week 1
March 2010, Week 5
March 2010, Week 4
March 2010, Week 3
March 2010, Week 2
March 2010, Week 1
February 2010, Week 4
February 2010, Week 3
February 2010, Week 2
February 2010, Week 1
January 2010, Week 5
January 2010, Week 4
January 2010, Week 3
January 2010, Week 2
January 2010, Week 1
December 2009, Week 5
December 2009, Week 4
December 2009, Week 3
December 2009, Week 2
December 2009, Week 1
November 2009, Week 5
November 2009, Week 4
November 2009, Week 3
November 2009, Week 2
November 2009, Week 1
October 2009, Week 5
October 2009, Week 4
October 2009, Week 3
October 2009, Week 2
October 2009, Week 1
September 2009, Week 5
September 2009, Week 4
September 2009, Week 3
September 2009, Week 2
September 2009, Week 1
August 2009, Week 5
August 2009, Week 4
August 2009, Week 3
August 2009, Week 2
August 2009, Week 1
July 2009, Week 5
July 2009, Week 4
July 2009, Week 3
July 2009, Week 2
July 2009, Week 1
June 2009, Week 5
June 2009, Week 4
June 2009, Week 3
June 2009, Week 2
June 2009, Week 1
May 2009, Week 5
May 2009, Week 4
May 2009, Week 3
May 2009, Week 2
May 2009, Week 1
April 2009, Week 5
April 2009, Week 4
April 2009, Week 3
April 2009, Week 2
April 2009, Week 1
March 2009, Week 5
March 2009, Week 4
March 2009, Week 3
March 2009, Week 2
March 2009, Week 1
February 2009, Week 4
February 2009, Week 3
February 2009, Week 2
February 2009, Week 1
January 2009, Week 5
January 2009, Week 4
January 2009, Week 3
January 2009, Week 2
January 2009, Week 1
December 2008, Week 5
December 2008, Week 4
December 2008, Week 3
December 2008, Week 2
December 2008, Week 1
November 2008, Week 5
November 2008, Week 4
November 2008, Week 3
November 2008, Week 2
November 2008, Week 1
October 2008, Week 5
October 2008, Week 4
October 2008, Week 3
October 2008, Week 2
October 2008, Week 1
September 2008, Week 5
September 2008, Week 4
September 2008, Week 3
September 2008, Week 2
September 2008, Week 1
August 2008, Week 5
August 2008, Week 4
August 2008, Week 3
August 2008, Week 2
August 2008, Week 1
July 2008, Week 5
July 2008, Week 4
July 2008, Week 3
July 2008, Week 2
July 2008, Week 1
June 2008, Week 5
June 2008, Week 4
June 2008, Week 3
June 2008, Week 2
June 2008, Week 1
May 2008, Week 5
May 2008, Week 4
May 2008, Week 3
May 2008, Week 2
May 2008, Week 1
April 2008, Week 5
April 2008, Week 4
April 2008, Week 3
April 2008, Week 2
April 2008, Week 1
March 2008, Week 5
March 2008, Week 4
March 2008, Week 3
March 2008, Week 2
March 2008, Week 1
February 2008, Week 5
February 2008, Week 4
February 2008, Week 3
February 2008, Week 2
February 2008, Week 1
January 2008, Week 5
January 2008, Week 4
January 2008, Week 3
January 2008, Week 2
January 2008, Week 1
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager