LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: Re: Sham Consultants
From: "Jones, Virginia" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:12:30 -0400

text/plain (20 lines)

You haven't offended me.  One of the prime acceptance criteria of any
bid I let for records storage includes taking past statistics and
applying the bid prices to the stats giving me a one year, two year, and
5 year (length of a contract) estimated cost. I include every unit cost
and every service bid.  The bid that gives me the best TOTAL price based
on these stats, and meets ALL stated requirements wins.  So far, the big
guys have always been far more pricey in total than the local guys.
Simple math.

Ginny Jones
(Virginia A. Jones, CRM)
Records Manager
Information Technology Division
Newport News Dept. of Public Utilities
Newport News, VA
[log in to unmask]

List archives at
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main RECMGMT-L Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager