Skip repetitive navigational links
View: Next message | Previous More Hitsmessage
Next in topic | Previous More Hitsin topic
Next by same author | Previous More Hitsby same author
Previous page (September 2005) | Back to main LRNASST-L page
Join or leave LRNASST-L (or change settings)
Reply | Post a new message
Search
Log in
Options:   Chronologically | Most recent first
Proportional font | Non-proportional font

Subject:

Mapping the Town: Highlighting Adelman's "Moving into.."

From:

Dan Kern <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Dan Kern <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:06:27 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (86 lines)

Mapping the Town: Highlighting Adelman's "Moving Into Town" Monograph

by Linda Serra Hagedorn - August 30, 2005

Clifford Adelman's latest publication, Moving Into Town-And Moving On creates an analogy comparing community colleges to a town. Using national and representative data, this work examines the educational outcomes of traditionally aged community college students through their transcript records. The work corrects myths and brings new facts to light. 


Since the inception of American community colleges a little over a century ago, soaring student populations have been met with an expanding college mission.  Like a growing and thriving town that responds through new businesses, services, and increased construction, community colleges have responded not only to increases in demand for their services, but also to growing diversity of students who benefit from their offerings.  Dr. Clifford Adelman, senior research analyst at the U.S. Department of Education, recently published Moving Into Town-And Moving On, wherein he analogized the community college to a town and provided analyses of progress of traditionally aged community college students.  Analogies serve as useful tools providing clarity to the unknown through comparison to the familiar.  Adelman's recent project was inspired by the earlier work of Clark Kerr (1963) who likened the smaller environments of early colleges with towns while seeing modern universities as cities. 




Similar to towns, the inhabitants of community colleges (i.e., students) differ by their purpose and longevity of occupancy.  Adelman likened some students to visitors who come as temporary residents but never establish a true residency (earning less than 30 credits).  Other students are more like tenants who establish a temporary home on a short-term basis with the realization that it may be home for now, but there are plans for a future move (30 credits or more but not the majority of college credits).  Finally, finishing the analogy, Adelman assigns the title of homeowner to the students who establish a residency and connection with the community college through the earning of at least 60 % of all of their undergraduate credits at the community college.




The analogy refreshes and supports dialogue of the differences between community college students and their four-year university counterparts.  Furthermore, the reader is encouraged to differentiate community college students based on their course-taking actions that ultimately may determine the educational benefits derived.  The town taxonomy emphasizes the greater heterogeneity among community college students than that among their four-year counterparts.  Using Adelman's metaphor, one might map community college towns and university cities on different continents across the globe.  




Interestingly, higher education researchers, policymakers, and administrators have known that older students who attend college are much more likely to attend a community college.  While that fact remains true, Adelman informs us that more traditionally aged students are choosing community colleges.  Note the emphasis on the word choosing.  Community colleges are not only higher education for those who could not be academically accepted at more prestigious institutions.  Community colleges have more to offer than open admission policies.  Price, diversity, smaller class size, convenient locations, and other qualities are attracting more traditionally aged students regardless of their academic prowess and likelihood of acceptance in prestigious universities.  Adelman reminds us that 40 % of all traditionally aged students in higher education enter through the portals of community colleges.  Another corrected myth is that community colleges are the choice for students of color.  Adelman has shown that with the exception of Latinos, traditionally aged students of color are no more likely to enroll in community colleges than their Caucasian counterparts.  Perhaps most important of all is the bursting of the long held conclusion that community colleges serve to "cool out" students from obtaining bachelor degrees.  Or said differently and within the metaphor, community colleges are towns with opportunities for those who wish to participate rather than deserts providing a false oasis beckoning low achievement students with a mirage composed only of mist and without substance.  




Within the metaphor, the community college town contains six distinct groupings that can be likened to communities or neighborhoods: (a) traditional academic students seeking transfer, (b) intermediate occupational students seeking credentials, (c) weaker secondary school students earning a small number of credits, (d) "passer-bys" who appear for only a short time and then disappear, (e) temporary transfers who take but a few credits and then move on, and (f) undergraduate reverse transfers.  Just as neighborhoods tend to group individuals with similar backgrounds, the community college town contains diversity within these described or circumscribed groupings.  




This classification scheme allows us to group students in accordance with their activities and course-taking patterns rather than by the usual demographics of gender, ethnicity, or age.  Adelman's typology describes the diversity of the American community college in a new light-measured by how students utilize and live within the "town" rather than by condition of birth.  Of course like most typologies, Adelman's may look less ideal when viewed from alternate or opposing angles.  There are streams of diversity running through the six categories that also could be used to define and separate the groupings.  For example, predominant level of course work such as remedial versus college level may also be a hefty divider of community college students-although much of the report repudiates the long term effect of remediation if students pass the courses.  Full and part time enrollment (enrollment intensity) or even demographics such as distance between home and campus may be useful in defining the taxonomy.  Although addressed briefly, the differences between students in "trade-like" vocational programs and those in more "liberal arts" type curricula was not been given sufficient weight.  Many community colleges might be compared to segregated towns because vocational and liberal arts faculty and students virtually never meet, never speak, and remain completely separate.  Vocational courses and apprenticeship programs such as culinary arts, welding, and auto theory typically require students to don clothing appropriate to their goals.  These students' appearance on campus immediately separates them from those on campus to attend an English, History or Mathematics course.  Walking on any campus that includes true vocational curriculums will likely reveal student social groupings by discipline.  Although anecdotal, I would like to add a personal comment based on 30 years of community college involvement.  I cannot remember ever seeing a student dressed in auto theory overalls conversing comfortably within a group of traditional students decked in the trends of student garb.  




While the Moving Into Town report ventures into new territory, it also brings us back to the traditional measures of success of community college students-namely subsequent attendance at a four-year university.  Using national data (NELS88/2000) and logistic regression, Adelman points out that aspirations, academic resources, and socio-economic level remain statistically significant predictors.  While these analyses really bring no surprises, we must accept the fact that although community colleges are very different from universities, if students are to cross the bridge to the "big city" (i.e., university), the typical predictors still hold fast and that academic outcomes count when the goal is academic (i.e., bachelor degrees).  




Through tables delineating the first institution of attendance by 12th graders from the high school classes of 1972, 1982, and 1992, we see expected trends of an increasing percentage of students from the second through fifth quintile choosing community colleges.  In only the highest quintile is the trend one of decreasing enrollments.  Logistic regression equations verify that students who begin postsecondary education at the community college are more likely to have lower educational expectations, to have delayed entry, to not have taken advanced mathematics in high school, and overall to not have participated in intense academic curricula in high school.  




Back to the trichotomy of visitor, tenant, and homeowner, there is a surprise ending of sorts.  Tenants appear to be the group most likely to succeed-at least in terms of the typical postsecondary outcomes of transfer and retention.  Perhaps this may be likened to a case of declining property values for those who invested as homeowners.  It pays to come "to town" but not stay too long.  Other important findings are that what counts for transfer are college level mathematics, credits during summer, continuous enrollments, and a lack of withdrawals and repeats.  




Like other of Adelman's reports that utilize national transcript data, the current report provides a clear prescription for researchers and others.  The courses in which students enroll, the intensity of the curriculum, consistent enrollment, and persistence within courses (i.e., not dropping or withdrawing) contribute to the success of the student and to the well-being of the town.  Moreover, the reader may come away from the analogy with a fresh perspective of traditionally aged community college students.  Adelman has invited us to appreciate community colleges as postsecondary institutions with a high level of diversity deserving different snapshots and desegregation of the inhabitants.  



      Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record, Date Published: August 30, 2005
      http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number: 12139, Date Accessed: 9/1/2005 12:06:32 PM 







Dan Kern
Reading Skills Improvement
East Central College AD21
1964 Prairie Dell Road
Union, MO  63084
Phone:  636-583-5195
Extension:  2426
Fax:  636-584-0513
Email:  [log in to unmask]
"What you teach is second 
to whom you teach.  If it isn't,
please find a 'job' very far 
away from students"
(Andy Maedit)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your
subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web browser to
http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html

To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
January 2011
December 2010, Week 5
December 2010, Week 4
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 2
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 5
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
November 2010, Week 1
October 2010, Week 5
October 2010, Week 4
October 2010, Week 3
October 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 1
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 4
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5
August 2010, Week 4
August 2010, Week 3
August 2010, Week 2
August 2010, Week 1
July 2010, Week 5
July 2010, Week 4
July 2010, Week 3
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010, Week 1
June 2010, Week 5
June 2010, Week 4
June 2010, Week 3
June 2010, Week 2
June 2010, Week 1
May 2010, Week 4
May 2010, Week 3
May 2010, Week 2
May 2010, Week 1
April 2010, Week 5
April 2010, Week 4
April 2010, Week 3
April 2010, Week 2
April 2010, Week 1
March 2010, Week 5
March 2010, Week 4
March 2010, Week 3
March 2010, Week 2
March 2010, Week 1
February 2010, Week 4
February 2010, Week 3
February 2010, Week 2
February 2010, Week 1
January 2010, Week 5
January 2010, Week 4
January 2010, Week 3
January 2010, Week 2
January 2010, Week 1
December 2009, Week 5
December 2009, Week 4
December 2009, Week 3
December 2009, Week 2
December 2009, Week 1
November 2009, Week 5
November 2009, Week 4
November 2009, Week 3
November 2009, Week 2
November 2009, Week 1
October 2009, Week 5
October 2009, Week 4
October 2009, Week 3
October 2009, Week 2
October 2009, Week 1
September 2009, Week 5
September 2009, Week 4
September 2009, Week 3
September 2009, Week 2
September 2009, Week 1
August 2009, Week 5
August 2009, Week 4
August 2009, Week 3
August 2009, Week 2
August 2009, Week 1
July 2009, Week 5
July 2009, Week 4
July 2009, Week 3
July 2009, Week 2
July 2009, Week 1
June 2009, Week 5
June 2009, Week 4
June 2009, Week 3
June 2009, Week 2
June 2009, Week 1
May 2009, Week 5
May 2009, Week 4
May 2009, Week 3
May 2009, Week 2
May 2009, Week 1
April 2009, Week 5
April 2009, Week 4
April 2009, Week 3
April 2009, Week 2
April 2009, Week 1
March 2009, Week 5
March 2009, Week 4
March 2009, Week 3
March 2009, Week 2
March 2009, Week 1
February 2009, Week 4
February 2009, Week 3
February 2009, Week 2
February 2009, Week 1
January 2009, Week 5
January 2009, Week 4
January 2009, Week 3
January 2009, Week 2
January 2009, Week 1
December 2008, Week 5
December 2008, Week 4
December 2008, Week 3
December 2008, Week 2
December 2008, Week 1
November 2008, Week 5
November 2008, Week 4
November 2008, Week 3
November 2008, Week 2
November 2008, Week 1
October 2008, Week 5
October 2008, Week 4
October 2008, Week 3
October 2008, Week 2
October 2008, Week 1
September 2008, Week 5
September 2008, Week 4
September 2008, Week 3
September 2008, Week 2
September 2008, Week 1
August 2008, Week 5
August 2008, Week 4
August 2008, Week 3
August 2008, Week 2
August 2008, Week 1
July 2008, Week 5
July 2008, Week 4
July 2008, Week 3
July 2008, Week 2
July 2008, Week 1
June 2008, Week 5
June 2008, Week 4
June 2008, Week 3
June 2008, Week 2
June 2008, Week 1
May 2008, Week 5
May 2008, Week 4
May 2008, Week 3
May 2008, Week 2
May 2008, Week 1
April 2008, Week 5
April 2008, Week 4
April 2008, Week 3
April 2008, Week 2
April 2008, Week 1
March 2008, Week 5
March 2008, Week 4
March 2008, Week 3
March 2008, Week 2
March 2008, Week 1
February 2008, Week 5
February 2008, Week 4
February 2008, Week 3
February 2008, Week 2
February 2008, Week 1
January 2008, Week 5
January 2008, Week 4
January 2008, Week 3
January 2008, Week 2
January 2008, Week 1
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager