LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for SOCNET Archives


SOCNET Archives

SOCNET Archives


SOCNET@LISTS.UFL.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SOCNET Home

SOCNET Home

SOCNET  December 2005

SOCNET December 2005

Subject:

Re: Does p* contain p2?

From:

"Mark S. Handcock" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Mark S. Handcock

Date:

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:33:05 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (133 lines)

*****  To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org  *****

Dear Kim,

To add a few words to Tom's comments: The ERGM (exponential random graph model), referred to as "p*" here, is a way to parameterize arbitrary random graph models. In principle it can represent any probabilistic structure via appropriate choice of the network statistics in the model. However this is less than it seems, as determining the statistics to represent a given structure can be difficult and non-parsimonious.

The fundamental conceptual difference between the ERGM and p2 modeling perspectives is the use of fixed effects in the former and random effects in the latter. The choice of perspective is similar to that in other statistical settings (e.g., ANOVA and hierarchical models). Roughly: If the characteristics of these particular individuals in the network are of primary interest then a fixed effects (ERGM) approach is usually preferable. If the social process that generated the individual characteristics is of primary interest then the random effects (p2 and generalizations) is often preferred. 

In this sense the choice between ERGM and p2 perspectives is based on the primary scientific questions. These perspectives aside: the p2 and generalizations can be viewed as a further hierarchical specification of an ERGM, and the model forms at the highest level can be very similar. Most statisticians see the two as variants on a theme and mix random and fixed effects as appropriate.

Regards to all,

Mark

-------------------------------------------------
Mark S. Handcock
Professor of Statistics and Sociology    
Department of Statistics, C014-B Padelford Hall
University of Washington, Box 354322     Phone: (206) 221-6930
Seattle, WA 98195-4322.          FAX:   (206) 685-7419
Web: www.stat.washington.edu/~handcock
internet: [log in to unmask]
   


----Original Message----
From: Social Networks Discussion Forum
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of T.A.B.SNIJDERS
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:30 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Does p* contain p2?

> *****  To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org  *****
> 
> Dear Kim and social networkers,
> 
> p* and p2 do not contain each other either way. p* has an in
> principle unlimited possibility for network effects (and p2
> doesn't); the practical limitation resides in the
> estimability of these effects (cf.
> Snijders, Pattison, Robins, Handcock,  New specifications for
> exponential random graph models; To be published,
> Sociological Methodology; downloadable from
> http://stat.gamma.rug.nl/sprh_f.pdf
> p* now is often referred to as ergm (exponential random graph model).
> 
> On the other hand, p2 has random effects for representing
> between-actor differences (and p* doesn't). However,
> in/out/mixed-twostars effects in
> p* have to some degree a similar functionality; but the
> interpretability of unexplained variances at the actor level,
> which is a feature of p2, is not available in p*.
> 
> The focus of p2 is on testing effects of covariates, which
> can be actor-bound or dyad-bound, and which can interact with
> reciprocity; while controlling for differential actor
> tendencies to sending and receiving ties, and for
> reciprocity. The focus of p*/ergm is on structurally modeling
> networks (which may include covariate effects).
> 
> For p2, better estimation methods have been an advantage;
> recently there have been advances in estimation methods for
> both p*/ergm and p2, and p*/ergm now is in much better shape
> than with the earlier pseudolikelihood methods. I think that
> with recent and almost finished work on multivariate and
> multilevel p2, p2 retains an advantage concerning
> availability of good estimation methods across a range of
> model extensions. (The new January 2006 release of Stocnet
> will contain a new p2 version with multivariate and
> multilevel options.) p*/ergm has the advantage of a much
> better representation of structural network effects.
> 
> Best regards,
> Tom
> 
> 
> Kim Se Kwon wrote:
>> ---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
>> Sender:       Social Networks Discussion Forum <[log in to unmask]>
>> Poster:       Kim Se Kwon <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject:      Does p* contain p2?
>> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>> 
>> *****  To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org  *****
>> 
>> I've read some papers about p* and one paper about p2.
>> 
>> If I've read correctly, Equation 4 of reference 2 ;extends ;first p*
>> (equation 1) to contain covariates. And p2 is 'the extension of p1
>> that doesn't assume dyadic independence and accounts for nodal & dyadic covariates.'
>> 
>> Does p* (equation 4 in reference 2) contain p2? Because p* has p1 as
>> submodels, p2's model equation is very similar to p*'s. If not, what is the unique features of p2? 
>> 
>> Thanks in advance for any comments.
>> 
>> --- Equations ---
>> Equation 1 of Reference 2 ; : ; P(X = x) ;= exp(theta' * ;t(x)) /
>> c(theta) Equation 4 of Reference 2 ; : ; P(X = x) = exp(vec(x)' Z beta
>> + sum of alpha_k * d_k(x) + theta' * t(x)) / c(alpha, beta, theta) ;
>> (d_k : the number of individuals with exactly k links, Z : exogenous dyadic
>> covariates)
>> 
>> 
>> --- References ---
>> 1. Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks : I An
>> Introduction to markov graphs and p*. Stanley ;Wasserman...
>> 2. statnet: An R package for the Statistical Analysis and Simulation
>> of Social Networks, Mark S. Handcock...
>> 3. p2: a random effects model with covariates for directed graphs. Marijtje A. J. van Duijn...
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards
>> Se Kwon, Kim
>> 
>> -------------
>> KAIST (Korean Advanced Institute of Science & Technology) Mathematics
>> Student http://math.kaist.ac.kr
>> 
>> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
>> SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social
>> network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send an
>> email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line
>> UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.

_____________________________________________________________________
SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social
network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send
an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line
UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008, Week 62
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager