Skip repetitive navigational links
View: Next (less recent) message | Previous (more recent) message
Next (less recent) in topic | Previous (more recent) in topic
Next (less recent) by same author | Previous (more recent) by same author
Previous page (July 2006) | Back to main LRNASST-L page
Join or leave LRNASST-L (or change settings)
Reply | Post a new message
Search
Log in
Options:   Chronologically | Most recent first
Proportional font | Non-proportional font

Subject:

Accountability Proposal Evolves/articles-pdf links

From:

Dan Kern <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:15:01 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (92 lines)

Accountability Proposal Evolves


Three months ago, an association of state universities stepped out in front
of other higher education groups by announcing that it was exploring the
possibility of creating a new, voluntary system
<http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/04/03/nasulgc>  to define, measure and
make public how well its members educate undergraduates.

Today, the group, the National Association of State Universities and
Land-Grant Colleges, is providing new details about the plan,
<http://www.nasulgc.org/Accountability_DiscussionPaper_Revised_NASULGC.pdf>
which suggests that its members collect and make publicly available a common
and clearly defined "bundle of information" including consumer information
about costs and graduation rates, data about the "learning climate" on
campuses, and information on how students perform in college.

Although colleges already generate a wealth of information about their
performance, the NASULGC paper argues, it is insufficient for two reasons:
(1) the information is often incomparable from institution to institution,
because institutions collect it using differing definitions, and (2) much of
the data is not released to the public, in large part because institutions
believe it will be misunderstood or misused.

 

The thorniest set of measures, the report acknowledges, is in the area of
"educational outcomes" - particularly trying to gauge the quality of the
"general education" institutions offer. Part of the problem is figuring out
what to measure: critical thinking, analytical reasoning, written
communication? The answer to that question influences which tests might be
used: the Collegiate Learning Assessment, the Measure of Academic
Proficiency, the Collegiate Assessment of Academic Proficiency, to cite
three the NASULGC report mentions.

 

Continue 7-11-06 article:

http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/07/11/nasulgc

-    Doug Lederman <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 

 

".a new, voluntary system." article (Fresh Approach to
Accountability/4-3-06) link:

http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/04/03/nasulgc

 

".new details about the plan." 13-page pdf (Elements of Accountability for
Public Universities and Colleges/7-6-06) link:

http://www.nasulgc.org/Accountability_DiscussionPaper_Revised_NASULGC.pdf

 

".the earlier paper."  25-page pdf discussion paper (Improving Student
Learning in Higher Education Through Better Accountability and
Assessment/4-7-06) link:

http://www.nasulgc.org/Accountability_DiscussionPaper_NASULGC.pdf

 

".Charles Miller, has urged." 5-page pdf (Issue Paper:
Accountability/Consumer Information) link: 

http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports/miller.pdf

 

".creating a national 'unit records' database." article (Wrangling Over Unit
Records/7-7-06) link:

http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/07/07/unitrecord

 

 

 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your
subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web browser to
http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html

To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password