On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 06:29:00PM -0500, Daniel Franke wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 05:43:29PM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> > Experience in other lists says you get about the same number of
> > unsubscribes sent to the list even with that. Plus you break PGP
> > signatures.
> That shouldn't break signatures any more than the MTA adding RFC822
> headers breaks them. The part of the message that's signed is
> delimited by the BEGIN/END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE markers, and that's the
> only part that gets verified. Alternatively, if you use PGP/MIME, then
> the signed part is an attachment and only that gets verified.
Signatures are fine when they're the "BEGIN/END" type. With PGP/MIME,
the signature is an untouched attachment but the message body is
FFC-L uses this and my PGP/MIME signed messages do not verify correctly.
.''`. | This Sig Kills Fascists!
: :' : | http://deadbox.ath.cx