Unfortunately, I don't see it here:
Wonder what keeps it from officially being open source as it does
look pretty permissive indeed?
Jordan Wiens, CISSP
UF Network Security Engineer
On May 1, 2007, at 9:12 AM, Eric Lavigne wrote:
> Microsoft is open sourcing some very nice pieces of technology. They
> languages. They have released their new dynamic language runtime
> (DLR), a sandboxing runtime called Silverlight, as well as the first
> two of those four languages, under the Microsoft Permissive License,
> which seems like a very open license. OCaml is provided free as in
> beer, but under a more restrictive license that might keep it out of
> Linux distros.
> Here is the Microsoft Permissive License. It is a short license that
> doesn't seem to have any weird strings attached.
> This is a very significant gift to the open source community, and I
> don't see any indication of Trojans hiding inside.