Mark Oden wrote:
> Thanks Edward! The command has been running for 12 hours+ now, we'll
> see how long it takes :-)
Ouch, how much memory do you actually have in the system?
Did you use that buffer-size suggestion?
It's possible that specifying more buffer than you actual have forces
the system into a "swappy place" whereas letting the dymanic allocation
occur might have worked out better. Can't say for sure, just thinking
Just curious about what your performance metrics look like while running