LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BEST-L Archives


BEST-L Archives

BEST-L Archives


BEST-L@LISTS.UFL.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BEST-L Home

BEST-L Home

BEST-L  July 2008

BEST-L July 2008

Subject:

Georgia state judicial decision blocks coal plant

From:

Kathleen Pagan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Kathleen Pagan <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:39:38 -0400

Content-Type:

multipart/related

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (110 lines) , image001.gif (110 lines)

  

Source: Christian Science Monitor

 

Citing global warming, Georgia judge blocks coal plant

Eoin O'Carroll | 07.02.08

In what is thought to be an unprecedented ruling, a Superior Court judge
in Fulton County, Ga., halted the construction of a coal-fired power
plant, saying that the plant must limit its emissions of carbon dioxide.

Citing an April 2007 US Supreme Court ruling that recognizes carbon
dioxide - the primary gas responsible for global warming - as a
pollutant under the federal Clean Air Act, Judge Thelma Wyatt Cummings
Moore overturned a lower court's decision to issue an air-pollution
permit to Dynegy's Longleaf power plant near Columbus, Ga. Her decision
is believed to be the first one that links global warming to an
air-pollution permit.

The case had been brought by the Sierra Club and Friends of the
Chattahoochee, a local environmental group. They were represented by
GreenLaw, an Atlanta-based public-interest law firm.

The coal-fired power plant - the first proposed in Georgia in 20 years -
cannot begin construction until it can obtain a valid permit that
complies with the court's ruling.

The 19-page ruling
<http://www.green-law.org/Files/GreenLaw/2008/LongleafFinalSuperiorCourt
Decision.pdf>  [PDF via GreenLaw
<http://www.green-law.org/net/content/go.aspx?s=71240.0.101.19069> ]
says that "[t]here is no dispute that the proposed power plant would be
a 'major emitting facility' as defined by the [Clean Air] Act,"
requiring that the plant must incorporate the "best available control
technology" to limit carbon dioxide emissions.

GreenLaw says that the proposed plant would emit 9 million tons of CO2
each year
<http://www.green-law.org/net/content/go.aspx?s=71240.0.101.19069>  -
the equivalent of 1.3 million cars. The firm also notes that a typical
coal-fired plant emits 3.7 million tons annually, according to the Union
of Concerned Scientists.

The Atlanta-Journal Constitution quotes opponents of the plant who hail
the groundbreaking decision
<http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/printedition/2008/07/01/coal.html> :

"We think this is the beginning of the end of conventional coal-fired
power plants, because of the enormity of their emissions," said Bruce
Nilles, director of the Sierra Club's national campaign against coal.

Of the 80 coal plants in the permitting process nationwide, about 30 are
in active litigation, Nilles said. The Sierra Club is fighting coal
plants across the country and was one of the petitioners in the Georgia
case.

"Our state can find other ways to produce cleaner, more economically
beneficial energy," said Patty Durand, director of the Georgia Chapter
of the Sierra Club. "Other states are doing it. Why can't we?"

The New York Times says that the impact of the decision
<http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/01/business/01coal.html>  for the
Longleaf plant, or for other proposed plants in Georgia and around the
country, is unclear:

Robert Wyman, a partner in the Los Angeles office of Latham & Watkins,
the law firm, who has represented power producers in previous cases,
said of the decision: "I would be surprised if it had much of an impact.
I'm not sure other jurisdictions will pick up that opinion." He said
that, despite the Supreme Court finding, federal regulators had not
issued the finding required before a pollutant can be regulated.

Vickie Patton, the deputy general counsel at the Environmental Defense
Fund, however, argued that the judge's reasoning might prove persuasive
to other courts facing similar issues.

The Knight Science Journalism Tracker - an insider blog for science
writers - is skeptical that the ruling will stick
<http://ksjtracker.mit.edu/?p=6788> :

Big coal has BIG money, as do the utilities that burn its product, and
as does industry and, most important, as does the general public. None
are at all resigned to blackouts and rolling brownouts and soaring
electricity bills while coal capture and sequestration technologies
remain good ideas with absolutely no full-scale prototype operations,
anywhere.

 

 

Kathleen W. Pagan, AICP, Senior Planner

(352) 374-5249  http://growth-management.alachua.fl.us/

 

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

 

   

 


Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager