LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BEST-L Archives


BEST-L Archives

BEST-L Archives


BEST-L@LISTS.UFL.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BEST-L Home

BEST-L Home

BEST-L  July 2008

BEST-L July 2008

Subject:

Waste? Not

From:

"Dr. Ann C. Wilkie" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Dr. Ann C. Wilkie

Date:

Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:36:54 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (166 lines)

Waste? Not
We all produce a rich resource in our homes and then spend millions of
dollars to throw it away. A new movement says there are smarter ways to
think about waste.
The Boston Globe, Sunday, July 13, 2008

"IN A WORLD of rapidly diminishing resources, there's one we tend to
overlook. It's easy to produce and extremely abundant. But instead of
viewing it as an embarrassment of riches, we're more likely to see it as
just an embarrassment.

This neglected treasure is human waste. Urine is rich in nitrogen,
potassium, and phosphorus, the three main ingredients in artificial
fertilizer. Feces contains these nutrients, too, in smaller doses, and
the methane it produces can be harnessed as biogas, a green energy source.

But now a growing global movement aims to make sanitation more
sustainable by changing how both rich and poor countries think about
human waste - recasting it as a valuable resource that is most costly
when thrown away. Following a philosophy known as ecological sanitation,
or "ecosan," and fueled by a convergence of factors - the rising prices
of energy and artificial fertilizer, increasing worries about food
security, and concern for the environment - the push to reform
sanitation has gained currency around the world, driving innovations
from toilet design to farming practices.

In Europe, recent years have seen the advent of "urine diversion"
toilets, which separate the two kinds of waste in order to treat it more
efficiently, among other benefits. Locally, a private school in Weston
has installed flushless compost toilets manufactured by Clivus Multrum,
a company based in Lawrence. And several European pilot projects have
begun to experiment with vacuum-biogas toilets, which require very
little water and turn waste into energy.

Not everyone shares the enthusiasm for these sanitation technologies.
Skeptics point to the cost, health concerns, and challenge of changing
deeply ingrained habits and beliefs. Depending on the particular kind of
system, the changes could entail a different experience of the toilet,
or a different attitude toward the waste, or both.

The idea of recycling our feces and urine may seem surprising, and
perhaps disgusting, but the concept is hardly new. China and Japan have
long traditions of re-using human waste as fertilizer. Even in England,
as recently as the 19th century, "nightmen" would take human waste from
backyards to sell to farmers.

The flush toilet and its infrastructure have since become standard
throughout the developed world. Excreta flow out of sight to a sewer
system, and then to a waste treatment plant. In more remote areas, the
sewage goes to nearby septic tanks that must be periodically emptied.
The system's benefits are obvious, but it also has downsides that are
growing increasingly apparent.

Annually, each of us produces about 13 gallons of feces and 130 gallons
of urine, which is instantly diluted into the 4,000 gallons we use to
flush it. This large quantity of contaminated liquid further mixes with
"greywater," the water from the laundry, shower, and sink, tripling or
quadrupling the amount of water that must be treated as sewage in
energy-intensive plants. In effect, the system takes a relatively small
amount of pathogenic material - primarily the feces - and taints
enormous amounts of water with it. Especially in regions struggling with
freshwater scarcity, many observers have come to see this system as
highly inefficient.

In this model, it's not only water that's wasted, critics say - it's
also the valuable nutrients in the feces and urine, notably phosphorous.
Global fertilizer prices have tripled in the last year, partly due to a
shortage of phosphorus, which some see as a looming crisis. Against this
background, some argue that it would be folly not to capitalize on the
plentiful phosphorus in human waste. In the same vein, the methane it
generates has the potential to provide cheap, renewable energy.

Over the past couple of decades, some measures have already begun to
exploit the value of waste and improve the system's efficiency. It has
become common for treatment plants to convert some of the methane
generated by sludge into biogas to partially power their own plants.
Low-flush toilets and waterless urinals are small steps to conserve
water. And the practice of using treated sludge - renamed "biosolids" -
as chemical fertilizer has become customary in parts of the developed
world. In the United States, according to the Environmental Protection
Agency, about 50 percent of all biosolids are being recycled to land.
The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority turns all of its sludge into
fertilizer, some of which it sells commercially through a contractor and
some of which it gives to communities.

Although the EPA has issued treatment regulations, and the MWRA defends
the safety of its fertilizer, there are concerns about the impact of
sludge-derived products on soil and human health.

The most radical visionaries of this movement would apply the same
principles to sanitation that we have begun to apply to other garbage in
our homes.

The benefits of taking urine out of the waste stream are clear: Urine
makes up less than 1 percent of all waste water in developed countries,
but contains a huge proportion of the nitrogen and phosphorus. Those
nutrients are essential to agriculture but harmful in water bodies, and
removing them is the most energy-intensive part of treating waste water.
And since urine is almost sterile, it can be used as fertilizer with
little to no treatment.

There are, however, obstacles to widespread implementation of unorthodox
toilets. Space limitations make compost toilets infeasible in most urban
areas. Vacuum toilets require a different plumbing system. And there may
be psychological barriers to changing habits in the bathroom.

Partly due to the lack of infrastructure, it's in the developing world
where the biggest changes have so far taken place. The problems there
are quite different. Due to the lack of proper sanitation facilities,
diseases caused by ingested fecal matter are rampant; diarrhea, for
example, kills more children than AIDS. But the advantages of the ecosan
approach are similar, because a well-designed system allows people to
harvest the benefits of waste. And given the poverty and food
insecurity, these benefits are often more acutely felt.

A popular kind of toilet is called the fossa alterna, in which two
3-meter-deep pit latrines are dug side by side. Once one is filled,
after about a year, it is sealed off, and the other one is used.
Eventually, the waste in the first pit will be ready to be retrieved -
after time, the pathogens die off - and used or sold as fertilizer for
crops.

A more sophisticated system, used most often in urban areas, allows
groups of families, as well as schools, to produce their own biogas. To
create biogas, vegetable scraps and grass and human excreta are
collected in a pit. They produce methane, which is captured in a tube
and channeled to a kitchen stove or shower. The UN is involved in such
projects in India and Senegal, among other places.

One of the most successful efforts has unfolded in Ethiopia. Starting in
2005, Catholic Relief Services introduced a toilet called the arborloo
to extremely poor Ethiopian farmers.

The arborloo is a shallow pit latrine that costs only $5. When it's
filled, the farmer plants a fruit tree seedling. The farmers are given
two seedlings, one to plant in the arborloo, and another as a control.
The comparison enables them to observe that the one in the arborloo
grows much faster and produces more fruit. The farmers can eat the fruit
and sell it on the market. Today more than 26,000 farmers are using
these toilets, with strong support from the Ethiopian government.

This simple device has brought about the kind of change in thinking that
reformers hope will eventually take root in the developed world.

"Some of our farmers say, 'We used to think poop was dirty, but now it's
our gold,'" says Mayling Simpson-Hebert, a technical adviser with
Catholic Relief Services in East Africa. "They won't let their children
defecate in the open. They say, 'Go put your gold in the toilet.'" "

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/07/13/waste_not/?page=full

-- 
**********************************************************************
Dr. Ann C. Wilkie                          Tel: (352)392-8699
Soil and Water Science Department          Fax: (352)392-7008
University of Florida-IFAS
P.O. Box 110960                         E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Gainesville, FL 32611-0960
______________________________________________________________________
Campus location: Environmental Microbiology Laboratory (Bldg. 246).
http://campusmap.ufl.edu/
______________________________________________________________________
BioEnergy and Sustainable Technology Society
http://grove.ufl.edu/~bests/

**********************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager