LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BEST-L Archives


BEST-L Archives

BEST-L Archives


BEST-L@LISTS.UFL.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BEST-L Home

BEST-L Home

BEST-L  December 2008

BEST-L December 2008

Subject:

This gloomy assessment is from the USDOE and USDA

From:

"David E. Bruderly" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

David E. Bruderly

Date:

Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:19:43 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (135 lines)

Besters

This gloomy assessment is from the USDOE and USDA:

Am I missing something? This report confirms that corn ethanol will yield
higher (1.8%) or similar ghg emissions without considering secondary land
use changes, result in lower supplies and export of corn for food, and
require much higher energy prices to be commercially viable - this is with
current biofuel policy.

 

This gloomy assessment is from the Biomass Research and Development Board.
It strikes me as requiring rose tinted reading glasses; it does not support
the theory that biofuels will make a significant near-term contribution to
the climate chaos problem let alone contribute to more sustainable global
agriculture.

 

R&D into higher crop yields and more sustainable farming are nice long term
goals; but if biofuels do NOT reduce ghg emissions in the near-term then it
seems to me that infrastructure incentives and R&D money needs to be focused
on deployment of REAL solutions that reduce ghg emissions NOW.  In addition
R&D is needed that opens more pathways to even more significant ghg
emissions reductions through zero-carbon energy carriers.

 

Throwing good money after bad makes absolutely no sense.

 

Am I missing something?

 

dave

 


Report: Improved Crops Would Help Meet Federal Biofuel Targets


A new report from the Biomass Research and Development Board finds that
higher corn yields and improved energy crops could make it much easier to
meet the federal Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) in coming years. The RFS
requires conventional ethanol production to increase to 15 billion gallons
per year by 2016, and to meet that with current trends in corn yields would
require a 4.1% increase in corn acreage. The good news is that the increase
would be mostly accommodated by existing farmland in the areas that now grow
most of the nation's corn, but the increased production would also cause a
price increase that would cut non-ethanol corn use by 5.2% and reduce
exports by 7.7%. Although the report did not examine international effects,
such a cut in U.S. corn exports would presumably spur greater production in
other countries, which could lead to land use changes that would impact
greenhouse gas emissions. However, higher U.S. corn yields could ease these
impacts. While the report assumes a yield increase of about 2 bushels per
acre per year, an accelerated increase in corn yield of about 3.1 bushels
per acre per year would mitigate most corn prices impacts, as well as the
impacts of corn plantings on other crop production. 

The RFS also requires the production of 20 billion gallons of advanced
biofuels, such as cellulosic ethanol, by 2022. Cellulosic ethanol is
produced from non-food biomass sources, such as corn stover (the stalks,
leaves, and cobs from corn), wood chips, other agricultural residues, and
energy crops such as straw, switchgrass, and poplar. Wood chips left over
from wood product production and from forest fuels reduction are expected to
supply about 4 billion gallons of cellulosic ethanol. That provides relief
for farm-based feedstocks, holding their price to about $45 per ton versus
$60 per ton without the wood chips. Agricultural residues would provide
about 60% of the remaining 16 billion gallons, with corn stover comprising
most of the residues, even though the report assumes that some corn stover
will be left in place to maintain land quality. The remaining cellulosic
ethanol will be produced from dedicated energy crops, including hay in the
Northern Plains, the Mountain States, and the Pacific region, and other
energy crops in the Corn Belt, the Southeast, Appalachia, and the
Mississippi Delta. Most crops will probably be grown on pasture land or
unproductive farmland, although some productive farmland will be shifted to
energy crops, particularly in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. 

The report also examines the greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts within the United
States of meeting the RFS requirements. It notes that the increase in corn
production will boost agricultural GHG emissions by only 1.8%, the
equivalent of about 8 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions, and a
boost in corn yield could essentially eliminate that increase. However, the
report does not account for international impacts or for secondary impacts
on livestock production and feed production, nor does it take credit for
reductions in petroleum consumption. The report does anticipate that a high
price for fuel and a price of $25 per thousand tons of carbon dioxide
emissions would encourage farmers to reduce their GHG emissions, and thus
reduce the impact of growing the energy crops. The report concludes with a
call for research on higher crop yields, on more sustainable farming
methods, and on a broad portfolio of potential energy crops. It also calls
for more data on energy crops and more rigorous models to examine the
impacts of growing such crops on such factors as GHG emissions. The Biomass
Research and Development Board is co-chaired by DOE and the U.S. Department
of Agriculture (USDA), and is part of the Biomass Research and Development
Initiative (BRDi), which involves six federal agencies and two executive
offices. See the
<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=bWFpbGluZ2lkPTM3MzU2N
iZtZXNzYWdlaWQ9UFJELUJVTC0zNzM1NjYmZGF0YWJhc2VpZD0xMDAxJnNlcmlhbD0xMjE1NDY0N
TYwJmVtYWlsaWQ9YnJ1ZGVybHlAYmVsbHNvdXRoLm5ldCZ1c2VyaWQ9YnJ1ZGVybHlAYmVsbHNvd
XRoLm5ldCZleHRyYT0mJiY=&&&110&&&http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/!ut/p/_s.7_0_
A/7_0_1OB?contentidonly=true&contentid=2008/12/0304.xml> USDA press release
and the full report (
<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=bWFpbGluZ2lkPTM3MzU2N
iZtZXNzYWdlaWQ9UFJELUJVTC0zNzM1NjYmZGF0YWJhc2VpZD0xMDAxJnNlcmlhbD0xMjE1NDY0N
TYwJmVtYWlsaWQ9YnJ1ZGVybHlAYmVsbHNvdXRoLm5ldCZ1c2VyaWQ9YnJ1ZGVybHlAYmVsbHNvd
XRoLm5ldCZleHRyYT0mJiY=&&&111&&&http://www.brdisolutions.com/Site%20Docs/Inc
reasing%20Feedstock_revised.pdf> PDF 9.7 MB).
<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=bWFpbGluZ2lkPTM3MzU2N
iZtZXNzYWdlaWQ9UFJELUJVTC0zNzM1NjYmZGF0YWJhc2VpZD0xMDAxJnNlcmlhbD0xMjE1NDY0N
TYwJmVtYWlsaWQ9YnJ1ZGVybHlAYmVsbHNvdXRoLm5ldCZ1c2VyaWQ9YnJ1ZGVybHlAYmVsbHNvd
XRoLm5ldCZleHRyYT0mJiY=&&&112&&&http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readst
ep2.html> Download Adobe Reader.

 

 

David E. Bruderly PE

Clean Power Engineering

Wise Gas Inc.

920 SW 57th Drive

Gainesville FL 32607-3838

352-377-0932

 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager