Skip repetitive navigational links
View: Next message | Previous More Hitsmessage
Next in topic | Previous More Hitsin topic
Next by same author | Previous More Hitsby same author
Previous page (September 2009, 5) | Back to main LRNASST-L page
Join or leave LRNASST-L (or change settings)
Reply | Post a new message
Search
Log in
Options:   Chronologically | Most recent first
Proportional font | Non-proportional font

Subject:

Report Examines Impact of Finances on Community College Students/What Works for the Needy/Book Reviews

From:

Dan Kern <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Open Forum for Learning Assistance Professionals <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:43:38 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (335 lines)

Report Examines Impact of Finances on Community College Students

Increasing numbers of young Americans are choosing to enter postsecondary
education through community colleges -- but too many of them are having to
work and attend part time and too few of them are leaving with degrees as a
result, the think tank Demos argues in a report
<http://demos.org/publication.cfm?currentpublicationID=067E668C-3FF4-6C82-52
B97ADF17DE3CF5> released Tuesday.

Source: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/09/30/qt#209467



Work Less, Study More & Succeed

How Financial Supports Can Improve Postsecondary Success

September 29, 2009

By Viany
<http://demos.org/people.cfm?currentpersonnelid=1BE9C30C%2D3FF4%2D6C82%2D576
FA332CFC25F43> Orozco Nancy
<http://demos.org/people.cfm?currentpersonnelid=A917DBC0%2D3FF4%2D6C82%2D53B
BB33042CAC94E> K. Cauthen

View the PDF <http://www.demos.org/pubs/studymore.pdf> (right-click and
save link as to download) | Order a <mailto:[log in to unmask]> Hardcopy

Even though more of today's young adults are motivated to seek a
postsecondary education, too many of them are sidelined by the financial
burden of paying for school while meeting their other financial obligations.
This report argues that to increase postsecondary success among low- to
moderate-income students, we must reform financial aid and provide
additional financial supports to help students cover the cost of living
expenses (especially housing and transportation) so that young students can
work less, study more, and finish their degrees.

Highlights Include:

・ In the last 25 years, college costs have increased more than 400
percent, while the median family income has increased less than 150 percent.
Not only has financial aid not kept pace with the rise in costs, it has
shifted away from awards based on financial need to loans and merit-based
aid.



・ Even after accounting for all financial sources, full-time,
full-year community college students from families with the lowest incomes
averaged $6,544 of unmet need per year; students from the lower-middle
income quartile had an average unmet need of nearly $5,000.



・ To finance their educations, 58 percent of young community
college students enroll in school only part time, and 61 percent work more
than 20 hours per week. Yet research clearly indicates that full-time
enrollment and part-time employment of less than 15 hours per week provides
the optimal situation for young students to concentrate on their studies and
finish their degree.



・ Surveys of students who have left college without earning a
credential routinely cite employment and finances as the main reasons for
student departure: one study found that nearly 40 percent of students who
worked full time while enrolled dropped out within three years, compared to
19 percent of students who worked part time and 13 percent who did not work.




・ Part-time enrollment appears to increase the risk of departure
even more than employment-after controlling for other factors, 51 percent of
students who enrolled part time left by the end of three years without a
credential compared to 14 percent.

Source and Preview the Report:
http://demos.org/publication.cfm?currentpublicationID=067E668C-3FF4-6C82-52B
97ADF17DE3CF5




What Works for the Needy


September 30, 2009

When it comes to policies that help the needy attend college, simplicity
rules, and financial aid programs seem to be more effective when they link
money to academic performance and/or support services for students.

Those are the key findings of a paper, <http://www.nber.org/papers/w15387>
"Into College, Out of Poverty? Policies to Increase the Postsecondary
Attainment of the Poor," published this week by the National Bureau of
Economic Research. The paper, by written David Deming of Harvard University
and Susan Dynarski of the University of Michigan, was supported by the Robin
Hood Foundation as part of its forthcoming book, Targeting Investments in
Children: Fighting Poverty When Resources are Limited (University of Chicago
Press).

The scholars' paper does not present any new data; it instead reviews 17
studies by other scholars on a range of federal, state and philanthropic
programs and policies that aim in one way or another to reduce what needy
students must spend on college to try to increase their access to college --
and, increasingly, to keep them enrolled. The list of programs is long: Pell
Grants, subsidized loans, tax incentives and veterans' benefits at the
federal level (as well as the Upward Bound college prep program), tuition
subsidies and need- and merit-based grant programs at the state level, and
foundation programs like the Gates Millennium Scholars
<http://www.gmsp.org/> .

Deming and Dynarski examined the programs to try to gauge which are most
effective, dollar for dollar, at increasing college going and persistence.
They draw attention to some comparatively little known programs --
underscoring the "very encouraging" results in student retention, for
instance, produced through MDRC's
<http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/05/22/scholarship> "Opening Doors"
project, which provided small grants and significant services at community
colleges in Louisiana, New York and Ohio.

But the authors' most intriguing conclusions are probably the ones they draw
about the country's most highly visible programs: federal Pell Grants and
state initiatives like Georgia's HOPE Scholarship program. While Pell Grants
are narrowly targeted at the scholars' chosen goal -- drawing low-income
students into higher education who would not otherwise have gone at all --
they fall short of their promise because they require so much paperwork
(especially on the part of applicants who are often intimidated by the Free
Application for Federal Student Aid). "If targeted students are deterred by
administrative hurdles, these programs will not work as well as intended,"
the authors write.

Many advocates for low-income students have criticized Georgia's merit-based
HOPE program (which has no income cutoff and goes to students with high
high-school grade point averages) because its funds have gone
disproportionately to students from higher up on the income scale. But the
program's simplicity -- potential recipients know that they can get free
tuition at any public college in the state if they get a 3.0 in high school
-- makes it highly effective in getting low-income students into college,
even if it means that large numbers of students who are not in the target
population of needy students also benefit.

"In sum, the best evidence for effective financial aid on educational
attainment comes from simple, broad-based programs," the authors write. If
enough students from low-income families enter college because of HOPE and
programs like it, they argue -- a threshold that they say previous studies
show the programs clearly pass -- it appears that "a simple, broad-based aid
program can increase social welfare."

The authors go out of their way to say that they do not mean to imply that
Pell is not effective -- only that it is far less effective than it could
be, and that the changes Congress and the Obama administration are
considering to simplify both the process for applying for federal aid and
the criteria the government uses to award the grants would strengthen it
significantly. "We try to focus on what can be done pretty simply to improve
the program," Deming said in an interview.

Donald E. Heller, director of Pennsylvania State University's Center for the
Study of Higher <http://www.ed.psu.edu/cshe/> Education and another
financial aid researcher, said he did not read the study as suggesting that
the Georgia program is better or more effective than Pell. But he did say he
thought the paper's authors "missed the boat" by failing to point out that
HOPE's effectiveness as a tool to help the poor get a higher education could
be greatly enhanced if it added a financial need component.

"They say that the reason that HOPE has such a large impact is because it is
very transparent," Heller said. "But I'm surprised they didn't say that if
you did something that was as simple to understand, but was based on need,
it would have an even bigger impact" from a social welfare standpoint.

"Just imagine if you took the $460 million a year Georgia spends and said
something equivalent, like 'If you're from income below $x, you will go to
college for free,' " Heller said. "You would get some kind of multiplier if
the state put it in need-based aid instead."

- <mailto:[log in to unmask]> Doug Lederman

Go
<http://www.insidehighered.com/layout/set/print/news/2009/09/30/aid#Comments
> to comments (1) ≫

* <http://www.insidehighered.com/career/seekers> Search Jobs

(c) Copyright 2009 Inside Higher Ed


Related Stories


* <http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/09/23/fafsa> FAFSA
Experiment Boosts College Going
September 23, 2009
* <http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/09/18/aid> House Passes
Student Aid Bill
September 18, 2009
* <http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/09/16/ega> Here Today,
Gone Tomorrow
September 16, 2009
* <http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/09/15/default> Economy
Sinks, Default Rates Rise
September 15, 2009
* <http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/09/14/aid> More Aid ≠
More Graduates
September 14, 2009

Sources: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/09/30/aid



http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/09/30/aid



Book Reviews:

On Critically Conscious Research: Approaches to Language and Literacy
Research

reviewed by Marcella Kehus
<http://www.tcrecord.org/AuthorDisplay.asp?aid=21196> - August 31, 2009

Source: http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=15763





Deaf Cognition: Foundations and Outcomes



reviewed by Diane Clark
<http://www.tcrecord.org/AuthorDisplay.asp?aid=21195> - August 31, 2009



Source: http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=15762





The Very Thought of Education: Psychoanalysis and the Impossible Professions



reviewed by K. Daniel Cho
<http://www.tcrecord.org/AuthorDisplay.asp?aid=21192> - August 24, 2009



Source: http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=15758





Breaking into the All-Male Club: Female Professors of Educational
Administration





reviewed by Carol Issac
<http://www.tcrecord.org/AuthorDisplay.asp?aid=21193> - August 24, 2009




Source: http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=15759












Dan Kern

AD21, Reading

East Central College

1964 Prairie Dell Road

Union, MO 63084-4344

Phone: (636) 583-5195

Extension: 2426

Fax: (636) 584-0513

Email: [log in to unmask]



http://www.studentveterans.org/



Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is
it politic?' Vanity asks the question, 'Is it popular?' But, conscience asks
the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a
position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but one must take it
because one's conscience tells one that it is right. (Martin Luther King,
Jr.)

Instruction begins when you, the teacher, learn from the learner. Put

yourself in his place so that you may understand what he learns and

the way he understands it. (Kierkegaard)



To freely bloom - that is my definition of success. -Gerry Spence, lawyer
(b. 1929) [Benjamin would be proud, I think.]




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your
subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web browser to
http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html

To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
January 2011
December 2010, Week 5
December 2010, Week 4
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 2
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 5
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
November 2010, Week 1
October 2010, Week 5
October 2010, Week 4
October 2010, Week 3
October 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 1
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 4
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5
August 2010, Week 4
August 2010, Week 3
August 2010, Week 2
August 2010, Week 1
July 2010, Week 5
July 2010, Week 4
July 2010, Week 3
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010, Week 1
June 2010, Week 5
June 2010, Week 4
June 2010, Week 3
June 2010, Week 2
June 2010, Week 1
May 2010, Week 4
May 2010, Week 3
May 2010, Week 2
May 2010, Week 1
April 2010, Week 5
April 2010, Week 4
April 2010, Week 3
April 2010, Week 2
April 2010, Week 1
March 2010, Week 5
March 2010, Week 4
March 2010, Week 3
March 2010, Week 2
March 2010, Week 1
February 2010, Week 4
February 2010, Week 3
February 2010, Week 2
February 2010, Week 1
January 2010, Week 5
January 2010, Week 4
January 2010, Week 3
January 2010, Week 2
January 2010, Week 1
December 2009, Week 5
December 2009, Week 4
December 2009, Week 3
December 2009, Week 2
December 2009, Week 1
November 2009, Week 5
November 2009, Week 4
November 2009, Week 3
November 2009, Week 2
November 2009, Week 1
October 2009, Week 5
October 2009, Week 4
October 2009, Week 3
October 2009, Week 2
October 2009, Week 1
September 2009, Week 5
September 2009, Week 4
September 2009, Week 3
September 2009, Week 2
September 2009, Week 1
August 2009, Week 5
August 2009, Week 4
August 2009, Week 3
August 2009, Week 2
August 2009, Week 1
July 2009, Week 5
July 2009, Week 4
July 2009, Week 3
July 2009, Week 2
July 2009, Week 1
June 2009, Week 5
June 2009, Week 4
June 2009, Week 3
June 2009, Week 2
June 2009, Week 1
May 2009, Week 5
May 2009, Week 4
May 2009, Week 3
May 2009, Week 2
May 2009, Week 1
April 2009, Week 5
April 2009, Week 4
April 2009, Week 3
April 2009, Week 2
April 2009, Week 1
March 2009, Week 5
March 2009, Week 4
March 2009, Week 3
March 2009, Week 2
March 2009, Week 1
February 2009, Week 4
February 2009, Week 3
February 2009, Week 2
February 2009, Week 1
January 2009, Week 5
January 2009, Week 4
January 2009, Week 3
January 2009, Week 2
January 2009, Week 1
December 2008, Week 5
December 2008, Week 4
December 2008, Week 3
December 2008, Week 2
December 2008, Week 1
November 2008, Week 5
November 2008, Week 4
November 2008, Week 3
November 2008, Week 2
November 2008, Week 1
October 2008, Week 5
October 2008, Week 4
October 2008, Week 3
October 2008, Week 2
October 2008, Week 1
September 2008, Week 5
September 2008, Week 4
September 2008, Week 3
September 2008, Week 2
September 2008, Week 1
August 2008, Week 5
August 2008, Week 4
August 2008, Week 3
August 2008, Week 2
August 2008, Week 1
July 2008, Week 5
July 2008, Week 4
July 2008, Week 3
July 2008, Week 2
July 2008, Week 1
June 2008, Week 5
June 2008, Week 4
June 2008, Week 3
June 2008, Week 2
June 2008, Week 1
May 2008, Week 5
May 2008, Week 4
May 2008, Week 3
May 2008, Week 2
May 2008, Week 1
April 2008, Week 5
April 2008, Week 4
April 2008, Week 3
April 2008, Week 2
April 2008, Week 1
March 2008, Week 5
March 2008, Week 4
March 2008, Week 3
March 2008, Week 2
March 2008, Week 1
February 2008, Week 5
February 2008, Week 4
February 2008, Week 3
February 2008, Week 2
February 2008, Week 1
January 2008, Week 5
January 2008, Week 4
January 2008, Week 3
January 2008, Week 2
January 2008, Week 1
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager