Skip repetitive navigational links
View: Next message | Previous More Hitsmessage
Next in topic | Previous More Hitsin topic
Next by same author | Previous More Hitsby same author
Previous page (October 2009, 5) | Back to main LRNASST-L page
Join or leave LRNASST-L (or change settings)
Reply | Post a new message
Search
Log in
Options:   Chronologically | Most recent first
Proportional font | Non-proportional font

Subject:

Surge in H1N1 Cases on Campus/Educause Releases Annual Campus IT Study/ Key Senator Criticizes Education Dept. on Loan Plan/ The Mysterious Missing Veterans' Education Claims/DNA Swab for Your Job

From:

Dan Kern <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Open Forum for Learning Assistance Professionals <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:13:05 -0500

Content-Type:

multipart/related

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (447 lines) , image001.gif (447 lines) , image002.gif (447 lines)


Surge in H1N1 Cases on Campus/Educause Releases Annual Campus IT Study/ Key
Senator Criticizes Education Dept. on Loan Plan/ The Mysterious Missing
Veterans' Education Claims/DNA Swab for Your Job 


 

 

Surge in H1N1 Cases on Campus

Colleges have seen a surge in the rates at which students are being
diagnosed with H1N1 or similar flu illnesses, according to new data from the
American College Health Association. The association has been using a
national sample of 270 colleges and universities to track the spread of
H1N1, and, in the last week, the rate of cases increased by 34 percent. In
addition, several regions where H1N1 had appeared to be in decline -- the
Northeast, Southeast, Mid-Atlantic and the Midwest -- saw increases. Of the
colleges in the survey, 97 percent reported new cases. Details on the latest
data are available here. <http://www.acha.org/ILI_Surveillance.cfm> 

Source:  http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/10/29/qt#211898

 


ACHA Pandemic Influenza Surveillance
Influenza Like Illness (ILI) in Colleges and Universities

With preliminary epidemiologic data on novel H1N1 flu suggesting significant
risk among those in the college setting, ACHA deems it epidemiologically
valuable to identify disease burden and population based attack rates of
influenza like illnesses (ILI) [ICD-CM Diagnosis 487.1] on college campuses.
ACHA has thus undertaken an effort to enlist (on a voluntary basis)
interested institutions of higher education to submit data on a weekly basis
regarding the number of new cases of ILI. 

New ILI cases reported include those seen in the student health service,
those triaged over the phone by a health care professional but simply told
to self-isolate and not be seen in the health service, and those known by
the health service to have been seen in a local emergency department or
urgent care center.

  _____  


 <http://www.acha.org/ILI_Epicurve_Enlarge.cfm>
http://www.acha.org/ILIimages/Epicurve_spot.gif



RELATED LINKS

 



http://www.acha.org/images/triangleyr.gif
<http://www.acha.org/ILI_ProjectDescription.cfm> Project Description

http://www.acha.org/images/triangleyr.gif
<http://www.acha.org/info_resources/ACHA_Guidelines_H1N1_Sep09.pdf> ACHA
Guidelines: Campus Response to Novel Influenza H1N1 (.PDF)

http://www.acha.org/images/triangleyr.gif
<http://www.acha.org/ILI_Archive.cfm> Archive of Previous Weeks' Reports


The links below depict weekly case data for the period October 17-23, 2009
as reported to ACHA, as well as ACHA's cumulative case data and an epicurve
chart reflecting weekly case counts and weekly attack rates.

In this weekly period of influenza activity, a total of 8,861 new ILI cases
were reported (twenty hospitalizations) among campus populations totaling
over 3.1 million. Ninety-seven percent of 270 colleges and universities
reported new ILI cases, compared to 95% reporting new cases the prior week.
The nationwide attack rate was 28.0 cases/10,000 students, thirty-four
percent higher than the prior week's rate, indicating a significant surge in
flu like illness on college campuses. 

Unexpectedly, the resurgence of flu activity has been observed in several
regions that had previously seen declines. For example, the Southeast,
Midwest, Mid-Atlantic, and Northeast regions have all experienced a rebound
in disease. As the CDC reported this week, flu is widespread nationally and
fluctuation in disease activity varies significantly both on local and
regional levels. Again, no deaths were observed among the reporting
institutions for the weekly period of October 17th through October 23rd.

"Among over 3 million students, we have observed nearly 56,000 cases of ILI.
But there have been only 98 hospitalizations and no deaths, indicating this
disease remains generally mild. It is somewhat surprising to see resurgence
of disease in regions that had seen recent declines. This likely reflects
the relative lack of natural immunity among young adults and students'
vulnerability to the infection. We remain concerned about the risk of
exposure to vulnerable students on our campuses and their potential to
infect those in their communities or their families who are at higher risk
for complications, hospitalization, or worse. This recent return of flu
helps reaffirm the importance of vaccination once it becomes available."
according to Dr. James C. Turner, president of the American College Health
Association and executive director of the department of student health at
the University of Virginia. 

    http://www.acha.org/images/triangleyr.gif
<http://www.acha.org/ILI_LatestWeek.cfm> Weekly College Case Data [ICD-CM
Diagnosis 487.1]

    http://www.acha.org/images/triangleyr.gif
<http://www.acha.org/ILI_Cumulative.cfm> Cumulative Data Since Report
Inception [ICD-CM Diagnosis 487.1]

    http://www.acha.org/images/triangleyr.gif
<http://www.acha.org/ILI_Epicurve.cfm> Epicurve Chart [ICD-CM Diagnosis
487.1]

Note: These data do not represent all institutions of higher education,
nationwide. 

Limitations: State case counts and rates do not represent the complete
incidence of ILI in the state's population, nor the incidence of ILI among
all institutions of higher education in the state. The case counts and rates
only represent those institutions of higher education that participate in
the surveillance program. 

Suggested Citation: American College Health Association. American College
Health Association Influenza Like Illnesses (ILI) Surveillance in Colleges
and Universities Fall 2009: Weekly College ILI cases reported. Linthicum,
MD: American College Health Association; 2009.

Source:  http://www.acha.org/ILI_Surveillance.cfm

 

Educause Releases Annual Campus IT Study

The higher ed technology group Educause on Wednesday released its based on
the results of its
<http://net.educause.edu/coredata/reports/2008/index.asp> "Core Data Service
Fiscal Year 2008 Summary Report," annual survey of 930 colleges and
universities. This year's installment focuses on information technology
trends on campuses between 2004 and 2008. Centralized IT funding rose, but
only in proportion to enrollment and inflation. Outsourcing became more
popular: In 2008, 70 percent of colleges used an external supplier for at
least one IT function, and the use of homegrown systems decreased for all
categories except library information systems. Colleges have increasingly
turned to commercial vendors for learning management systems and e-mail
clients, with a number of campuses considering dropping institutional e-mail
addresses altogether, the report says.

Key Senator Criticizes Education Dept. on Loan Plan

Well, you can't say that Sen. Lamar Alexander isn't an equal opportunity
irritant to his successors as U.S. education secretary. Alexander, a
Tennessee Republican who headed the federal agency during the first Bush
administration, won the eternal gratitude of many college leaders by
stopping Education Secretary Margaret Spellings dead in her tracks two years
ago when she tried to use the federal regulatory process to bring about
major changes in higher education accreditation. (Alexander argued that
Spellings was trying to work around Congress, and helped pass legislation to
make sure she couldn't; the secretary wasn't pleased.) On Wednesday, he took
to the Senate floor to criticize Spellings' successor, Arne Duncan, on
roughly similar grounds. He was unhappy that Duncan had sent a letter this
week urging college presidents to get their campuses ready for a possible
switch to the government's direct student loan program, even though Congress
has yet to pass -- and the Senate has yet to consider -- legislation that
would mandate such a switch, by ending lending through the bank-based
Federal Family Education Loan Program. "The secretary's gotten a little
ahead of himself," Alexander said, adding that the "Washington takeover" of
the loan program -- he's not a fan of President Obama's proposal -- requires
Congressional approval because "we have more than one branch of government
in this town." He urged the administration to stop trying to ram through
legislation that would force thousands of colleges to switch loan programs
by July 1, which could result, Alexander said, in a "14 million car pileup
on the interstate highways of American education," envisioning students
unable to get loans because of administrative disarray in the government-run
program. Administration officials have repeatedly said that colleges have
found it much easier to switch loan programs than critics allege, and that
they are intent on making changes that will pour tens of billions of dollars
more into student aid programs.

The Mysterious Missing Veterans' Education Claims

While the Department of Veterans Affairs has acknowledged
<http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/09/28/qt#209270>  the concerns of
many campus officials that they were experiencing serious delays with
benefits for students eligible for the greatly expanded Post-9/11 GI Bill,
and expedited payments to veterans in many cases, college administrators
remain on high alert about the issue. So when the VA revamped its weekly
Monday Morning Workload Reports
<http://www.vba.va.gov/REPORTS/mmwr/index.asp>  this month, and omitted the
all-important education claims (as reported
<http://whatsbrewin.nextgov.com/2009/10/wheres_vas_report.php?oref=latest_po
sts>  by the National Journal's NextGov), the move set off alarm bells for
some veterans' education administrators. "A gov't report that has existed in
the same format for decades suddenly declared misleading when the figures
get alarming? Oh please!!!!" wrote one campus official on a widely read
listserv. Asked about the disappearance of the statistics from the weekly
report, a spokesman for the Veterans Affairs Department said that the
education claims had been "inadvertently" dropped in the revision, and that
they would return in the next report. For those following at home, the
spokesman provided the following numbers for the week of October 11-17:
Buffalo, 68,847; Atlanta, 57,090; St. Louis, 45,112; Muskogee, 64,848;
Total, 232,897.

Source:  http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/10/29/qt#211898


DNA Swab for Your Job 


October 29, 2009 

Many colleges now require criminal background checks of all new employees.
But the University of Akron -- in what some experts believe is a first -- is
not only requiring a criminal background check, but is stating that new
employees must be willing to submit a DNA sample.

The requirement was added quietly and is now receiving attention -- and
criticism -- because an adjunct faculty member at Akron quit this week,
citing the new rules. "It's not enough that the university doesn't pay us a
living wage, or provide us with health insurance, but now they want to
sacrifice the sanctity of our bodies. No," said Matt Williams, who had been
teaching four courses this semester in the communications and continuing
education programs.

Williams is a vice president of the New Faculty Majority,
<http://newfacultymajority.info/national/>  a national organization created
this year to advance adjunct interests, and he said that he felt it was time
to take a stand and say that there are limits on how much those off the
tenure track will take from their employers. While the criminal background
checks and potential DNA sample apply to those hired for any position,
Williams noted that adjuncts like himself are technically hired and rehired
semester by semester, and thus could face this prospect term after term.

The <http://www.uakron.edu/hr/background_checks_applicants.php>  new rules
at Akron were adopted by the Board of Trustees in August, but most faculty
members only learned of them in a recent e-mail list of announcements sent
by the university to all employees. The rules state that background checks
will be performed on all candidates selected for employment and that all
offers will be "contingent on successful completion" of the check. Further,
they state that all applicants "may be asked to submit a DNA sample." The
rules specifically state that all employees, including faculty members, are
covered.

Laura Martinez Massie, spokeswoman for Akron, said that the university would
not comment on the resignation of Williams. She also said that to date, the
university has not collected DNA and has no plans to do so, but is "merely
reserving the right to do so."

Massie said that Akron wants "a safe environment for all of its students and
employees" and that "DNA testing was included in the policy because there
have been national discussions that indicate that in the future, reliance on
fingerprinting will diminish and DNA for criminal identification will be the
more prominent technology." If this happens, she said, Akron wants "the
flexibility to adopt the new technology if we found it necessary."

While some colleges have added background checks or tightened screening
procedures in the wake of incidents involving their employees, Akron faculty
leaders said that they knew of no recent event involving employees that
would have suggested a need for such a policy. "Any reasoning behind this is
known to administrators only," said Stephen H. Aby, a librarian and
professor of bibliography at Akron. Aby is also a past president of the
university's chapter of the American Association of University Professors
(which represents full-time professors at the university) and has been
investigating the issue for the AAUP there.

Many faculty members "have been taken aback by the sweep and invasiveness"
of the policy, Aby said. He added that the AAUP was not consulted in
advance, and that some believe that imposing the rules now violates the
union's contract. He said faculty members want to know why DNA would be
collected, what would happen with the samples and how any information would
be used -- and that the policy suggests complete discretion on all such
matters would go to the administration.

While Aby said that he and his colleagues are bothered by the DNA
requirement on principle, he also thinks it is a strategic mistake for the
university. 

"If a university adopts such an abhorrent policy, if you are competing for
top faculty and these faculty members have options, I can't imagine this
would be a good draw," he said.

Andy Brantley, president and CEO of the College and University Professional
Association for Human Resources, said he had never heard of a college having
a rule that would permit DNA testing of new employees. He said that, if
asked about starting such a policy, he would advise a college to check the
implications it might have for various federal laws, such as the Americans
With Disabilities Act and the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act privacy rules.

While Brantley said that while he'd never heard of a DNA rule like the one
at Akron, criminal background checks by colleges are not rare. "I know that
there are lots of faculty that disagree" with such policies, but he said
that they are appropriate. "As an employer, the first responsibility of any
college is the safety of the community," he said.

The national AAUP's position on criminal background checks
<http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/newsroom/prarchives/2004/back.htm>  is that they
should be required only when related to "particular obligations of specific
positions." Policies like Akron's (even without the DNA requirement) in
which all applicants must undergo checks are criticized as unnecessary
invasions of privacy.

Reaction at Akron to the protest resignation of Williams has been mixed.
Some comments in The Buchtelite,
<http://www.buchtelite.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticleComments&ustor
y_id=6ed4df70-571c-4975-beaa-be9e14a1e195#37d7defb-9679-41b7-ba59-7b8cbbeae3
6f>  the student newspaper, were critical. One adjunct wrote that Williams
had "screwed over his students," adding: "As an adjunct instructor, I feel
his pain. I know what it's like to not have health insurance and to receive
lesser pay for equal work. However, what you don't do is shoot yourself in
the foot by resigning your position midway through."

Other comments were supportive. "His is an act of courage and principle. As
long as we continue to accept without comment or protest the appalling
conditions in which we work, conditions will never change. What kind of
example do we show our students by refusing to do anything about our
unprofessional working conditions?"

Williams said he "absolutely" had concerns about leaving his students in the
middle of the semester. But he noted that American higher education appears
unconcerned about the fact that adjuncts are part of "the revolving door" at
most colleges, there one semester and gone the next. So while he's leaving
in the middle of the semester, "it is not me who has created this system."

He also said he was showing students that there are principles worth
fighting for, in this case at the expense of his job. (Williams does some
freelance Web consulting and will now focus on that to replace his lost
income.) "I'm not willing to give up my time and to be treated in this
manner," he said. "It is unfortunate that students have become collateral
damage."

-  <mailto:[log in to unmask]> Scott Jaschik 

Go
<http://www.insidehighered.com/layout/set/print/news/2009/10/29/akron#Commen
ts>  to comments (1) > 


Comments on DNA Swab for Your Job 


*	For trustees, too? 
*	Posted by RW , Prof at Large Public U. on October 29, 2009 at 7:00am
EDT 

.         It would be interesting to know if the criminal background
check/DNA policy applies to the Board of Trustees. Perhaps I'm too cynical,
but I suspect they'd argue they aren't technically employees, and are
therefore exempt.


Related Stories


*	 <http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/10/28/aaup> Seeking Tenure
'Conversion'
October 28, 2009 
*	 <http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/10/27/cornell> Contract
Non-Renewal = Dismissal
October 27, 2009 
*	 <http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/10/26/southwestern> Can
Free Speech Be Furloughed?
October 26, 2009 
*	 <http://www.insidehighered.com/advice/survival_guide/gunsalus12>
Facing a Student Complaint
October 21, 2009 
*	 <http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/10/13/fellows> Stimulus
for Humanities Job Market
October 13, 2009 

C Copyright 2009 Inside Higher Ed 

Sources:
http://www.insidehighered.com/layout/set/print/news/2009/10/29/akron

 

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/10/29/akron

 

 

 

Dan Kern

AD21, Reading

East Central College

1964 Prairie Dell Road

Union, MO  63084-4344

Phone:  (636) 583-5195

Extension:  2426

Fax:  (636) 584-0513

Email:  [log in to unmask]

 

http://www.studentveterans.org/

 

Veterans Day 2009: http://www1.va.gov/opa/vetsday/

 

www.vietnamwomensmemorial.org

 

Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is
it politic?' Vanity asks the question, 'Is it popular?' But, conscience asks
the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a
position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but one must take it
because one's conscience tells one that it is right. (Martin Luther King,
Jr.) 

Instruction begins when you, the teacher, learn from the learner. Put

yourself in his place so that you may understand what he learns and

the way he understands it. (Kierkegaard)

 

To freely bloom - that is my definition of success. -Gerry Spence, lawyer
(b. 1929)    [Benjamin would be proud, I think.]

 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your
subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web browser to
http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html

To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
January 2011
December 2010, Week 5
December 2010, Week 4
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 2
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 5
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
November 2010, Week 1
October 2010, Week 5
October 2010, Week 4
October 2010, Week 3
October 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 1
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 4
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5
August 2010, Week 4
August 2010, Week 3
August 2010, Week 2
August 2010, Week 1
July 2010, Week 5
July 2010, Week 4
July 2010, Week 3
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010, Week 1
June 2010, Week 5
June 2010, Week 4
June 2010, Week 3
June 2010, Week 2
June 2010, Week 1
May 2010, Week 4
May 2010, Week 3
May 2010, Week 2
May 2010, Week 1
April 2010, Week 5
April 2010, Week 4
April 2010, Week 3
April 2010, Week 2
April 2010, Week 1
March 2010, Week 5
March 2010, Week 4
March 2010, Week 3
March 2010, Week 2
March 2010, Week 1
February 2010, Week 4
February 2010, Week 3
February 2010, Week 2
February 2010, Week 1
January 2010, Week 5
January 2010, Week 4
January 2010, Week 3
January 2010, Week 2
January 2010, Week 1
December 2009, Week 5
December 2009, Week 4
December 2009, Week 3
December 2009, Week 2
December 2009, Week 1
November 2009, Week 5
November 2009, Week 4
November 2009, Week 3
November 2009, Week 2
November 2009, Week 1
October 2009, Week 5
October 2009, Week 4
October 2009, Week 3
October 2009, Week 2
October 2009, Week 1
September 2009, Week 5
September 2009, Week 4
September 2009, Week 3
September 2009, Week 2
September 2009, Week 1
August 2009, Week 5
August 2009, Week 4
August 2009, Week 3
August 2009, Week 2
August 2009, Week 1
July 2009, Week 5
July 2009, Week 4
July 2009, Week 3
July 2009, Week 2
July 2009, Week 1
June 2009, Week 5
June 2009, Week 4
June 2009, Week 3
June 2009, Week 2
June 2009, Week 1
May 2009, Week 5
May 2009, Week 4
May 2009, Week 3
May 2009, Week 2
May 2009, Week 1
April 2009, Week 5
April 2009, Week 4
April 2009, Week 3
April 2009, Week 2
April 2009, Week 1
March 2009, Week 5
March 2009, Week 4
March 2009, Week 3
March 2009, Week 2
March 2009, Week 1
February 2009, Week 4
February 2009, Week 3
February 2009, Week 2
February 2009, Week 1
January 2009, Week 5
January 2009, Week 4
January 2009, Week 3
January 2009, Week 2
January 2009, Week 1
December 2008, Week 5
December 2008, Week 4
December 2008, Week 3
December 2008, Week 2
December 2008, Week 1
November 2008, Week 5
November 2008, Week 4
November 2008, Week 3
November 2008, Week 2
November 2008, Week 1
October 2008, Week 5
October 2008, Week 4
October 2008, Week 3
October 2008, Week 2
October 2008, Week 1
September 2008, Week 5
September 2008, Week 4
September 2008, Week 3
September 2008, Week 2
September 2008, Week 1
August 2008, Week 5
August 2008, Week 4
August 2008, Week 3
August 2008, Week 2
August 2008, Week 1
July 2008, Week 5
July 2008, Week 4
July 2008, Week 3
July 2008, Week 2
July 2008, Week 1
June 2008, Week 5
June 2008, Week 4
June 2008, Week 3
June 2008, Week 2
June 2008, Week 1
May 2008, Week 5
May 2008, Week 4
May 2008, Week 3
May 2008, Week 2
May 2008, Week 1
April 2008, Week 5
April 2008, Week 4
April 2008, Week 3
April 2008, Week 2
April 2008, Week 1
March 2008, Week 5
March 2008, Week 4
March 2008, Week 3
March 2008, Week 2
March 2008, Week 1
February 2008, Week 5
February 2008, Week 4
February 2008, Week 3
February 2008, Week 2
February 2008, Week 1
January 2008, Week 5
January 2008, Week 4
January 2008, Week 3
January 2008, Week 2
January 2008, Week 1
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager