Skip repetitive navigational links
View: Next message | Previous More Hitsmessage
Next in topic | Previous More Hitsin topic
Next by same author | Previous More Hitsby same author
Previous page (December 2009, 1) | Back to main LRNASST-L page
Join or leave LRNASST-L (or change settings)
Reply | Post a new message
Search
Log in
Options:   Chronologically | Most recent first
Proportional font | Non-proportional font

Subject:

CAP: The Promise of Proficiency & The Week Ahead: three reports on the future of community colleges; Lumina: Accelerated Postsecondary Degree and Credential Programs

From:

Dan Kern <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Open Forum for Learning Assistance Professionals <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:20:31 -0600

Content-Type:

multipart/related

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (321 lines) , image001.jpg (321 lines)

The Promise of Proficiency

How College Proficiency Information Can Help High Schools Drive Student
Success

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/12/img/collegesummit_onpage.jpgS
OURCE: AP/Bebeto Matthews 

While schools have spent decades learning to measure and manage toward
graduation, they now need the data and measurement tools that will
demonstrate their college proficiency rate—or how well their students are
doing the year after high school. Without this information they must rely on
anecdotes at best and guesswork at worst.

By J.B. Schramm, E. Kinney Zalesne | December 3, 2009 

Download
<http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/12/pdf/collegesummitreport.pdf>
the full report (pdf)

Download
<http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/12/pdf/collegesummitreport_exec
_summ.pdf>  the executive summary (pdf)

Given the 21st century workforce’s demands, educators and policymakers agree
that high school’s purpose has changed. Whereas the goal of high school used
to be graduation, now it strives to launch students to college and career
success.

Unfortunately, high schools’ tools have not caught up with their mission.
While schools have spent decades learning to measure and manage toward
graduation, they now need the data and measurement tools that will
demonstrate their college proficiency rate—or how well their students are
doing the year after high school. Without this information they must rely on
anecdotes at best and guesswork at worst.

And that seems risky, given education’s importance to people’s lives and to
the economy. Indeed, asking schools to deliver postsecondary success without
enabling them to measure postsecondary performance is to demand the
impossible. After all, we wouldn’t ask air traffic controllers to land
planes with radars that shut down at 10,000 feet. We wouldn’t let surgeons
operate if they could only guess at how previous patients had done. And yet
at the moment we are asking high schools to deliver students who can perform
in college without giving schools the tools to know whether or how their
current efforts are paying off.

Throughout America, districts, schools, and nonprofits are starting to see
postsecondary data’s value, and they are improving their offerings based on
whether, where, and how successfully their graduates are enrolled the year
after high school. The federal government, too, has begun to see the value
of this data and is moving the needle forward, especially with the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act’s call for better data systems and college
proficiency reporting.

But the urgency of getting more American students to and through college
means the federal government should use the significant opportunity it has
to ground certain Recovery Act principles into lasting education policy.
With three targeted steps, the federal government can help 21st century high
schools meet their 21st century mission. Specifically, the federal
government should:

§  Support the gathering of college proficiency data by school, so that each
school can see how their students are doing in “Year 13,” or the first year
after college 

§  Disseminate the data and empower educators to interpret the information
and lead relevant programmatic change 

§  Support and reward high schools for progress in college proficiency, thus
encouraging the visibility of and activity toward this success outcome 

This paper is about helping every high school in America learn in a
systematic, methodical way how its graduates are doing, whether in four-year
colleges, two-year colleges, vocational programs, or apprenticeships. And
it’s about making sure high schools can use that information every day to
make sound, strategic decisions to launch their students to postsecondary
success.

Download
<http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/12/pdf/collegesummitreport.pdf>
the full report (pdf)

Download
<http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/12/pdf/collegesummitreport_exec
_summ.pdf>  the executive summary (pdf)

To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:

Print: Suzi Emmerling (foreign policy and security, energy, education,
immigration)
202.481.8224 or [log in to unmask]

Print: Jason Rahlan (health care, economy, civil rights, poverty)
202.481.8132 or [log in to unmask]

Radio: John Neurohr
202.481.8182 or [log in to unmask]

TV: Andrea Purse
202.741.6250 or [log in to unmask]

Web: Erin Lindsay
202.741.6397 or [log in to unmask]

© Center for American Progress <http://www.americanprogress.org> 

 

Sources:
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/12/promise_of_proficiency.html/p
rint.html

 

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/12/promise_of_proficiency.html

The Week Ahead:

 
<http://app.mx3.americanprogressaction.org/e/er.aspx?s=785&lid=35580&elq=ea8
d81c085ad44bd8a44df97efefb02c> EDUCATION: New reports on technical
assistance principles for performance pay and language for teacher
effectiveness; plus, three reports on the future of community colleges.

Source:  http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/domestic/education/

 

 

From the Lumina Foundation:


Back to School and Back to Work


December 3, 2009

Proposal for a National Strategy to Rapidly Train Workers for High-Demand,
High-Wage Jobs Through Accelerated Postsecondary Degree and Credential
Programs

Jamie Merisotis, President and CEO, Lumina Foundation for Education


Context


A major part of the national strategy for putting Americans back to work in
living wage jobs must be to get more individuals into and through
postsecondary education programs very rapidly, especially those offering
degrees and credentials linked to high-demand, high-wage occupations. Two
overarching factors make this imperative. First, the vast majority of jobs
currently available—and those likely to be created in the near-term—require
some form of postsecondary education. Second, individuals and families
without jobs or with limited income require immediate relief, something that
has been difficult for college and university programs to accomplish. Many
programs take too long to finish, particularly for families already under
financial pressure. Time is a major factor that drives many individuals—both
adults and traditional age students—into low-wage, low-skill jobs that
simply exacerbates the need for additional, and often costly, education in
the future.


Proposal


We propose a new national program that allows students to achieve
job-relevant postsecondary degrees and credentials very quickly—in a year or
less. A "shovel ready" program focused on students seeking Associate’s
degrees in high-demand, high-wage jobs could be established very rapidly in
collaboration with community colleges and other providers that are able to
deliver curriculum on an accelerated timeframe.1 The highest priority should
be given to programs that: 

1.	Target unemployed adults. 
2.	Partner with employers. 
3.	Focus on high-demand, high-wage occupational areas—e.g., healthcare,
teaching, green occupations, information technology. 

Programs would require students to treat their education as a job—to go to
college 9-5 every day, with other needs addressed through a range of student
services (assistance with housing, childcare, transportation, and other
real-life concerns). Students would receive a stipend that is significant
enough to reduce the need for any outside work until they complete the
degree. In effect, the stipend becomes their "pay" while they are completing
their "job" of getting a high quality, workforce-ready postsecondary
education.

Such a national, large-scale effort could be launched for an estimated $1.5
billion for every 100,000 participants who complete the program. Costs are
estimated at $12,000 per student for the stipend and $3,000 in other
institutional costs associated with course redesign, student recruitment and
assessment, and student services and counseling. We believe this could be
immediately implemented at approximately 10% of community and technical
colleges nationally (150-200 institutions) in the next year. Many more could
be ready within three years. 

Accelerated Associate’s degree programs have been piloted by states and
institutions with the goal of helping students earn quality credentials that
have real value in the new economy. Some of these are being developed
through support from Lumina Foundation and other philanthropic partners. A
large- scale expansion of these proven programs would help make President
Obama’s call for every American to complete at least one year of
postsecondary education a reality. 

Here are two promising examples of accelerated Associate’s degree programs: 

*	Indiana’s Ivy Tech Community College has a new "second-chance"
option for at-risk high school students who commit to enrolling in a
tuition-free, accelerated Associate’s degree in a high-demand field. The
program includes a summer "boot camp" for students who need developmental
education and a tuition-free transfer option for students to move into
four-year institutions. Students will complete the 60 credit hours necessary
for an Associate’s degree in just 10 months. The program treats
postsecondary education like a full-time job, with full-day time commitments
and block-scheduling of classes. This intensive schedule not only makes the
program much shorter; it also minimizes the distractions many students
encounter at college that contribute to dropping out. Students are given a
stipend to help pay for transportation and some meals, to augment the living
cost allowances typically available through financial aid programs. 
*	New York’s Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP) offers
free tuition, small classes, block schedules, and work experience to enable
highly motivated community college students to complete an Associate degree
more quickly. In 2007, a qualified cohort of more than 1,100 students
enrolled at CUNY's six community colleges (Borough of Manhattan Community
College, Bronx Community College, Hostos Community College, Kingsborough
Community College, LaGuardia Community College, Queensborough Community
College). Data for retention are very promising: 80% of ASAP students re-
enrolled full-time in fall 2008; a similar group of fall 2006 students had a
59% fall-to-fall retention rate. 

About Lumina Foundation

Lumina Foundation for Education is the nation's largest private foundation
committed to enrolling and graduating more students from college—especially
low-income students, students of color, first-generation students, and adult
learners. Our goal is to increase the percentage of Americans who hold
high-quality degrees and credentials to 60 percent by 2025. Lumina pursues
this goal in three ways: by identifying and supporting successful practices,
through public policy advocacy, and by using our communications and
convening power to build public will for change. For more information go to
www.luminafoundation.org <http://www.luminafoundation.org/>  

1 Various accelerated postsecondary programs, ranging from Certificate to
Bachelor’s degree programs, could be developed. We believe that accelerated
Associate’s degree programs would be the most immediate and impactful way to
connect high-demand, high-wage jobs with the required postsecondary
education needed to be successful in those jobs.

Source:  www.luminafoundation.org

 

 

 

 

Dan Kern

AD21, Reading

East Central College

1964 Prairie Dell Road

Union, MO  63084-4344

Phone:  (636) 583-5195

Extension:  2426

Fax:  (636) 584-0513

Email:  [log in to unmask]

 

http://www.studentveterans.org/

 

Veterans Day 2009: http://www1.va.gov/opa/vetsday/

 

www.vietnamwomensmemorial.org

 

Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is
it politic?' Vanity asks the question, 'Is it popular?' But, conscience asks
the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a
position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but one must take it
because one's conscience tells one that it is right. (Martin Luther King,
Jr.) 

Instruction begins when you, the teacher, learn from the learner. Put

yourself in his place so that you may understand what he learns and

the way he understands it. (Kierkegaard)

 

To freely bloom - that is my definition of success. -Gerry Spence, lawyer
(b. 1929)    [Benjamin would be proud, I think.]

 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your
subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web browser to
http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html

To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
January 2011
December 2010, Week 5
December 2010, Week 4
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 2
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 5
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
November 2010, Week 1
October 2010, Week 5
October 2010, Week 4
October 2010, Week 3
October 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 1
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 4
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5
August 2010, Week 4
August 2010, Week 3
August 2010, Week 2
August 2010, Week 1
July 2010, Week 5
July 2010, Week 4
July 2010, Week 3
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010, Week 1
June 2010, Week 5
June 2010, Week 4
June 2010, Week 3
June 2010, Week 2
June 2010, Week 1
May 2010, Week 4
May 2010, Week 3
May 2010, Week 2
May 2010, Week 1
April 2010, Week 5
April 2010, Week 4
April 2010, Week 3
April 2010, Week 2
April 2010, Week 1
March 2010, Week 5
March 2010, Week 4
March 2010, Week 3
March 2010, Week 2
March 2010, Week 1
February 2010, Week 4
February 2010, Week 3
February 2010, Week 2
February 2010, Week 1
January 2010, Week 5
January 2010, Week 4
January 2010, Week 3
January 2010, Week 2
January 2010, Week 1
December 2009, Week 5
December 2009, Week 4
December 2009, Week 3
December 2009, Week 2
December 2009, Week 1
November 2009, Week 5
November 2009, Week 4
November 2009, Week 3
November 2009, Week 2
November 2009, Week 1
October 2009, Week 5
October 2009, Week 4
October 2009, Week 3
October 2009, Week 2
October 2009, Week 1
September 2009, Week 5
September 2009, Week 4
September 2009, Week 3
September 2009, Week 2
September 2009, Week 1
August 2009, Week 5
August 2009, Week 4
August 2009, Week 3
August 2009, Week 2
August 2009, Week 1
July 2009, Week 5
July 2009, Week 4
July 2009, Week 3
July 2009, Week 2
July 2009, Week 1
June 2009, Week 5
June 2009, Week 4
June 2009, Week 3
June 2009, Week 2
June 2009, Week 1
May 2009, Week 5
May 2009, Week 4
May 2009, Week 3
May 2009, Week 2
May 2009, Week 1
April 2009, Week 5
April 2009, Week 4
April 2009, Week 3
April 2009, Week 2
April 2009, Week 1
March 2009, Week 5
March 2009, Week 4
March 2009, Week 3
March 2009, Week 2
March 2009, Week 1
February 2009, Week 4
February 2009, Week 3
February 2009, Week 2
February 2009, Week 1
January 2009, Week 5
January 2009, Week 4
January 2009, Week 3
January 2009, Week 2
January 2009, Week 1
December 2008, Week 5
December 2008, Week 4
December 2008, Week 3
December 2008, Week 2
December 2008, Week 1
November 2008, Week 5
November 2008, Week 4
November 2008, Week 3
November 2008, Week 2
November 2008, Week 1
October 2008, Week 5
October 2008, Week 4
October 2008, Week 3
October 2008, Week 2
October 2008, Week 1
September 2008, Week 5
September 2008, Week 4
September 2008, Week 3
September 2008, Week 2
September 2008, Week 1
August 2008, Week 5
August 2008, Week 4
August 2008, Week 3
August 2008, Week 2
August 2008, Week 1
July 2008, Week 5
July 2008, Week 4
July 2008, Week 3
July 2008, Week 2
July 2008, Week 1
June 2008, Week 5
June 2008, Week 4
June 2008, Week 3
June 2008, Week 2
June 2008, Week 1
May 2008, Week 5
May 2008, Week 4
May 2008, Week 3
May 2008, Week 2
May 2008, Week 1
April 2008, Week 5
April 2008, Week 4
April 2008, Week 3
April 2008, Week 2
April 2008, Week 1
March 2008, Week 5
March 2008, Week 4
March 2008, Week 3
March 2008, Week 2
March 2008, Week 1
February 2008, Week 5
February 2008, Week 4
February 2008, Week 3
February 2008, Week 2
February 2008, Week 1
January 2008, Week 5
January 2008, Week 4
January 2008, Week 3
January 2008, Week 2
January 2008, Week 1
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager