***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org *****
Acknowledging that this recommendation is self promoting: You might read our recent article on identifying bridges in networks:
Valente, T. W. & Fujimoto, K. (2010) Bridging: Locating critical connectors in a network.Social Networks, Vol. 32, p. 212-220.
It may help clarify or futher muddy the waters.
Thomas W. Valente, PhD
Director, Master of Public Health Program
Department of Preventive Medicine
Keck School of Medicine
University of Southern California
1000 S. Fremont Ave.
Building A Room 5110
Alhambra CA 91803
phone: (626) 457-4139
cell: (626) 429-4123
fax: (626) 457-6699
email: [log in to unmask]
My personal webpage:
Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods, and Applications:
http://www.oup.com/us (promo code: 28569)
The Empirical Networks Project
Evaluating Health Promotion Programs
(Oxford U. Press):
Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations
----- Original Message -----
From: Sandy I <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 3:20 pm
Subject: Brokerage... is there one best approach?
To: [log in to unmask]
> ***** To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org *****
> Hi there,
> I have a dilemma as I review some of my SNA results against the
> qualitative information I collected in my study; these results
> address the questions - who in my network helps to bring others
> together; and then who in my network helps to connect different
> segments of my network together. I assumed these are brokerage
> roles and so first considered betweenness central to identify key
> players in my network as a whole. I ended up identifying one
> particular node above all others as a prominent broker, yet in the
> interviews I conducted this particular organization, although
> offering much to the network, did not stand out as a connector -
> others were much more likely to do so. I reviewed the survey
> responses for this node, and the respondent indicated all kinds of
> connections outward towards others.
> I have been toying with using directed-betweeness, but I must
> admit to not understanding this concept entirely. I ran this in
> UCINET - actors I believed to be prominent brokers from my
> interviews now appear to be prominent brokers in my results- the
> actor initially identified falls back though still prominent. I'm
> not sure where to go from here. If someone could offer me some
> direction in this I'd greatly appreciate it.
> As for brokers connecting different sectors to one another, I used
> Fermandez and Gould's approach. Raw scores fit with what 'I'
> would have expected (I'm avoiding normalized scores for now), and
> in some ways also are more consistent with the directed-
> betweenness results although I realize this approach deals with
> egonetworks, not the whole of the network.
> Thanks for any thoughts or suggestions.
> SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social
> network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send
> an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line
> UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.
SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social
network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send
an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line
UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.