|
|
An interesting read, but it does not address a couple of key questions.
* Will the students be more likely to remediate their deficiencies at a community college or at a four year institution?
* Will the cost to the students be less at a community college?
Why are these two questions so important? Because the real focus should not be on which option is better for the state, but on which option is better for the student. Our state has already moved remedial courses away from four year institutions. I am waiting to see what the data says, but knowing the success and retention rates for remedial students at four year institutions, I suspect we will find that the students are better served at the community colleges.
Martin Golson
Instructional Specialist
Academic Support Center
Austin Peay State University
931-221-6553
-----Original Message-----
From: Open Forum for Learning Assistance Professionals [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Arendale
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 4:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Kicking the can down the road: Ohio to eliminate DE courses at 4-yr colleges
Greetings,
I just read an article in the Hamilton Journal-News that by 2015
nearly all remedial (also called developmental level) courses would be
eliminated at public four-year colleges in Ohio. "The nearly 40
percent of college freshmen in Ohio who are not ready for
college-level work will take most of their remedial courses at
community colleges under a statewide plan that dramatically changes
how four-year schools provide instruction to those needing extra
help." The newspaper reporter stated, "Ohio is following a national
trend that critics say could limit access to the four-year degrees
many need for high-paying jobs. Some fear it may discourage some
students from attending college at all." State education leaders, at
least those at the four-year institutions, said the long-term solution
was for elementary and secondary education to do a better job. "By the
end of 2012, university and college presidents must develop standards
of what it means for a student to be "remediation free." Critics of
the plan said "A lot of the students who need remediation are the same
students who have already been marginalized by the system because they
attended the worst high schools and are the least prepared," said Tara
L. Parker, a University of Massachusetts professor who studies
developmental education. "There is no evidence community colleges do
remedial courses any better or cheaper."
http://www.journal-news.com/news/hamilton-news/ohio-universities-to-drop-most-remedial-classes-1266589.html
The "Ohio Solution" is the same one that has been talked about since
the mid 1970s with the "Nation At Risk" report. Elementary and
secondary education must do a better job. Better articulation
agreements need to be developed between secondary and postsecondary
education. An endless number of education commissions made up of
leaders from K-12 education, postsecondary education, corporate world,
public advocacy groups, and the rest have been talking and
experimenting for years to make "this problem" go away.
It appears the intense fiscal pressures facing public four-year
colleges due to decreasing financial support from state government has
renewed the desire to "save costs" and eliminate remedial or
developmental-level courses. State officials claim offering these
courses at the four-year public four-year colleges costs $130 million
annually. While to the average taxpayer this seems considerable, what
is the combined budget for these public colleges? National studies on
this issue report the funds devoted to offering these courses is
between one and five percent. Most faculty who teach these courses are
part-time and paid considerably less than full-time and especially
tenured faculty members at the same four-year institution.
The "Ohio Solution" has been implemented previously in many other
places. They all share the same problems with achieving their stated
goals. Here are just a few quick thoughts on the matter. Many more
could be added by others.
1. Changing K-12 education curriculum does nothing to meet the needs
of returning adults to education. While their exit from high school
might have given them adequate skills for immediate entry to college,
the long period out of school has led to atrophy of their skills and
need for basic level instruction to bring them back to
college-readiness.
2. Even if a school district wanted to change its curriculum, if it
has less economic resources, how can it be expected to do the same
level of quality as the better-funded suburban schools?
3. Changing K-12 education curriculum does nothing for the students
who are not enrolled in rigorous college-bound curriculum. Some
students and their parents have other future plans that initially do
not include college. Maybe they plan to begin a family. Maybe attend a
trade school or continue in the family business. Do we want to only
have one track choice for students in high school?
4. Changing K-12 education curriculum does nothing for the students
who do not fully focus on their classes, read their textbooks with
great intensity, and complete all homework to perfection. If everyone
earned A's in their classes, achieved to highest level of proficiency
with all high risks tests, and in general, were "on task" all the
time, they might not need the developmental-level courses. Assuming
that they immediately enter postsecondary education immediately after
successful completion of high school. With skyrocketing tuition costs,
family members out of work or working low-wage jobs, and difficulty
for high-school students to earn much at part-time jobs that now are
sought by the out-of-work adults, it is not so easy to immediately
attend college. Some have to earn some money first.
A wise person once said, "complex problems require complex solutions."
The "Ohio Solution" fails on this account. So much more could be said
about this issue. Could some of our Ohio LRNASST members share more
about this? (My regrets if this has already been discussed recently on
LRNASST).
Take care,
David
David Arendale, Associate Professor, History & Higher Education and
Co-Director, Jandris Center for Innovative Higher Education. Author of
"Access at the Crossroads: Learning Assistance in Higher Education",
http://z.umn.edu/bookinfo
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, College of Education and Human
Development, Department of Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, Burton
Hall 225, 178 Pillsbury Drive, SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455; (work)
612-625-2928; (cell) 612-812-0032; [log in to unmask]
http://arendale.org http://twitter.com/DavidArendale
http://www.facebook.com/DavidArendale
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your
subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web browser to
http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html
To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your
subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web browser to
http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html
To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]
|
|
|
Archives |
January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011, Week 3 January 2011, Week 2 January 2011, Week 1 January 2011 December 2010, Week 5 December 2010, Week 4 December 2010, Week 3 December 2010, Week 2 December 2010, Week 1 November 2010, Week 5 November 2010, Week 4 November 2010, Week 3 November 2010, Week 2 November 2010, Week 1 October 2010, Week 5 October 2010, Week 4 October 2010, Week 3 October 2010, Week 2 October 2010, Week 1 September 2010, Week 5 September 2010, Week 4 September 2010, Week 3 September 2010, Week 2 September 2010, Week 1 August 2010, Week 5 August 2010, Week 4 August 2010, Week 3 August 2010, Week 2 August 2010, Week 1 July 2010, Week 5 July 2010, Week 4 July 2010, Week 3 July 2010, Week 2 July 2010, Week 1 June 2010, Week 5 June 2010, Week 4 June 2010, Week 3 June 2010, Week 2 June 2010, Week 1 May 2010, Week 4 May 2010, Week 3 May 2010, Week 2 May 2010, Week 1 April 2010, Week 5 April 2010, Week 4 April 2010, Week 3 April 2010, Week 2 April 2010, Week 1 March 2010, Week 5 March 2010, Week 4 March 2010, Week 3 March 2010, Week 2 March 2010, Week 1 February 2010, Week 4 February 2010, Week 3 February 2010, Week 2 February 2010, Week 1 January 2010, Week 5 January 2010, Week 4 January 2010, Week 3 January 2010, Week 2 January 2010, Week 1 December 2009, Week 5 December 2009, Week 4 December 2009, Week 3 December 2009, Week 2 December 2009, Week 1 November 2009, Week 5 November 2009, Week 4 November 2009, Week 3 November 2009, Week 2 November 2009, Week 1 October 2009, Week 5 October 2009, Week 4 October 2009, Week 3 October 2009, Week 2 October 2009, Week 1 September 2009, Week 5 September 2009, Week 4 September 2009, Week 3 September 2009, Week 2 September 2009, Week 1 August 2009, Week 5 August 2009, Week 4 August 2009, Week 3 August 2009, Week 2 August 2009, Week 1 July 2009, Week 5 July 2009, Week 4 July 2009, Week 3 July 2009, Week 2 July 2009, Week 1 June 2009, Week 5 June 2009, Week 4 June 2009, Week 3 June 2009, Week 2 June 2009, Week 1 May 2009, Week 5 May 2009, Week 4 May 2009, Week 3 May 2009, Week 2 May 2009, Week 1 April 2009, Week 5 April 2009, Week 4 April 2009, Week 3 April 2009, Week 2 April 2009, Week 1 March 2009, Week 5 March 2009, Week 4 March 2009, Week 3 March 2009, Week 2 March 2009, Week 1 February 2009, Week 4 February 2009, Week 3 February 2009, Week 2 February 2009, Week 1 January 2009, Week 5 January 2009, Week 4 January 2009, Week 3 January 2009, Week 2 January 2009, Week 1 December 2008, Week 5 December 2008, Week 4 December 2008, Week 3 December 2008, Week 2 December 2008, Week 1 November 2008, Week 5 November 2008, Week 4 November 2008, Week 3 November 2008, Week 2 November 2008, Week 1 October 2008, Week 5 October 2008, Week 4 October 2008, Week 3 October 2008, Week 2 October 2008, Week 1 September 2008, Week 5 September 2008, Week 4 September 2008, Week 3 September 2008, Week 2 September 2008, Week 1 August 2008, Week 5 August 2008, Week 4 August 2008, Week 3 August 2008, Week 2 August 2008, Week 1 July 2008, Week 5 July 2008, Week 4 July 2008, Week 3 July 2008, Week 2 July 2008, Week 1 June 2008, Week 5 June 2008, Week 4 June 2008, Week 3 June 2008, Week 2 June 2008, Week 1 May 2008, Week 5 May 2008, Week 4 May 2008, Week 3 May 2008, Week 2 May 2008, Week 1 April 2008, Week 5 April 2008, Week 4 April 2008, Week 3 April 2008, Week 2 April 2008, Week 1 March 2008, Week 5 March 2008, Week 4 March 2008, Week 3 March 2008, Week 2 March 2008, Week 1 February 2008, Week 5 February 2008, Week 4 February 2008, Week 3 February 2008, Week 2 February 2008, Week 1 January 2008, Week 5 January 2008, Week 4 January 2008, Week 3 January 2008, Week 2 January 2008, Week 1 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 July 2002 June 2002 May 2002 April 2002 March 2002 February 2002 January 2002 December 2001 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 July 2001 June 2001 May 2001 April 2001 March 2001 February 2001 January 2001 December 2000 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 July 2000 June 2000 May 2000 April 2000 March 2000 February 2000 January 2000 December 1999 November 1999 October 1999 September 1999 August 1999 July 1999 June 1999 May 1999 April 1999 March 1999 February 1999 January 1999 December 1998 November 1998 October 1998 September 1998 August 1998 July 1998 June 1998 May 1998 April 1998 March 1998 February 1998 January 1998 December 1997 November 1997 October 1997 September 1997 August 1997 July 1997 June 1997 May 1997 April 1997 March 1997 February 1997 January 1997 December 1996 November 1996 October 1996 September 1996 August 1996 July 1996 June 1996 May 1996 April 1996 March 1996 February 1996 January 1996 December 1995 November 1995 October 1995 September 1995 August 1995 July 1995 June 1995 May 1995 April 1995 March 1995 February 1995 January 1995
|
|