Skip repetitive navigational links
View: Next message | Previous More Hitsmessage
Next in topic | Previous More Hitsin topic
Next by same author | Previous More Hitsby same author
Previous page (April 2014) | Back to main LRNASST-L page
Join or leave LRNASST-L (or change settings)
Reply | Post a new message
Search
Log in
Options:   Chronologically | Most recent first
Proportional font | Non-proportional font

Subject:

from CC Daily

From:

Norman Stahl <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Open Forum for Learning Assistance Professionals <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:48:14 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (64 lines)

States setting mandates on developmental ed



By Ellie Ashford, Published April 21, 2014












​Development education is going to get a lot more attention from state lawmakersover the next few years, according to an official from theEducation Commission of the States (ECS), which tracks state policy trends.
As legislatures work through revamping K-12 policies, the next step will be to address developmental education in higher education, which mainly bridges the gap between high school and college-level work, said Matt Gianneschi, vice president of policy and programs at ECS.
According to Gianneschi, the trend is an outgrowth of the Common Core, a set of educational standards adopted by 44 states aimed at ensuring high school graduates are ready for college and careers. In 2015, the first round of career-ready benchmarks will be issued, and for the first time, there will be “a common entry point and a common exit point,” Gianneschi said, which is “creating tension between K-12 and higher education” and causing anxiety among legislators.
“This is now your issue,” he told community college leaders this month at the annual convention of the American Association of Community Colleges. “Early evidence indicates there won’t be more college-ready students; there will be fewer.”
As a result, there will be more pressure to provide skills-based education and data showing that graduates have attained jobs in their field.
“The black box is starting to become more transparent,” he said.
Meanwhile, the completion challenge — calling for the college degree attainment rate to increase from 40 percent of the U.S. population to 60 percent by 2020 — is also raising the stakes for community colleges.
A different approach
All this is leading to a big shift in how remedial education is viewed. Several years ago, the focus was on improving K-12 education to reduce the number of incoming college students who need developmental education, Gianneschi said. Now the focus has shifted to how well colleges are handling those students and the extent to which students are completing remedial education courses, moving on to credit-bearing courses and, ultimately, graduating, he said. And there’s a push to identify — and eliminate — the barriers that are preventing students from moving beyond developmental education.
Instead of letting higher education figure it out, some states are taking a more direct approach, Gianneschi said. Connecticut, for example, enacted legislation calling for college students who need limited remediation to be placed in accelerated “co-requisite” (concurrent developmental and college-level) courses. The measure also limits remediation to one semester of intensive pre-collegiate work.
In Colorado, a new law allows the use of multiple measures of readiness and also authorizes two- and four-year institutions to offer co-requisite courses for certain populations of students. The legislature directed the Colorado Commission on Higher Education to align its remedial education policy with the state’s higher education admissions requirements.
Florida has taken the most extreme approach, Gianneschi said. Its new law allows high school graduates and members of the military to bypass additional assessments and be placed directly into credit-bearing courses. If Florida students want to opt into remedial courses, they are given a list of instructional approaches to select, including co-requisite, modularized, compressed and contextualized courses.
Promote success
The general goal of these new state policies is to push students into regular education courses, rather than keep them out. That’s important because only one in 10 remedial students will eventually graduate, said Stan Jones of Complete College America, a nonprofit group focused on increasing degree attainment, especially among minorities.

“For too many of them, remediation is their first college experience and their last college experience,” Jones said.About 60 percent of recent high school graduates end up in remediation, including large numbers of African-Americans and Hispanics.
Math is the most troublesome subject for remedial students, and according to Achieving the Dream, 70 percent of college applicants who place into remedial math don’t even enroll. In Texas, only 15 percent of those who started in remedial math completed a college-level math course within three years.
Complete College America’s strategy is to look at remediation and placement testing differently — to find a way to help struggling students succeed and graduate, rather than put up barriers.

There are different models for co-requisites, such as having students spend an extra 45 minutes with the instructor after class, a required lab with mentors, additional class periods, five weeks of development education followed by 10 weeks of a regular course, and stretching a regular course over two semesters.Jones recommends more time on task and extra help for students when they need it. He also says co-requisite remedial courses are more effective than prerequisites.
According to Jones, the Community College of Baltimore County had a 74 percent success rate with a one-semester accelerated learning co-requisite model, compared with a 33 percent success rate with traditional remediation.
Fix it, don’t nix it
Hunter Boylan, director of the National Center for Developmental Education at Appalachian State University in North Carolina, agreed that stand-alone remedial courses haven’t worked very well at most community colleges, but he disputes the contention that “all remedial education is broken.”
“We have more than three decades of research on how to do effective course-based remediation,” Boylan said. “Fixing remedial courses is less costly and less labor-intensive than starting all over. We already have the infrastructure in place. We don’t use that infrastructure systematically so it’s connected to student success.”
If states are going to enact mandates on remediation, he said, “there are ways to do this wisely,” based on the following principles:

First identify baseline performance to help determine whether the new approach is successful.
Develop an evaluation plan early.
Pilot innovations to work the bugs out before implementing them across a whole college or state.
Allow for local flexibility in implementation, because what works on one campus might not work at another.
Provide professional development to help faculty implement mandates.
Involve those who will be implementing the mandates in the planning process.




Norman Stahl
[log in to unmask]



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To access the LRNASST-L archives or User Guide, or to change your
subscription options (including subscribe/unsubscribe), point your web browser to
http://www.lists.ufl.edu/archives/lrnasst-l.html

To contact the LRNASST-L owner, email [log in to unmask]

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
January 2011
December 2010, Week 5
December 2010, Week 4
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 2
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 5
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
November 2010, Week 1
October 2010, Week 5
October 2010, Week 4
October 2010, Week 3
October 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 1
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 4
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5
August 2010, Week 4
August 2010, Week 3
August 2010, Week 2
August 2010, Week 1
July 2010, Week 5
July 2010, Week 4
July 2010, Week 3
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010, Week 1
June 2010, Week 5
June 2010, Week 4
June 2010, Week 3
June 2010, Week 2
June 2010, Week 1
May 2010, Week 4
May 2010, Week 3
May 2010, Week 2
May 2010, Week 1
April 2010, Week 5
April 2010, Week 4
April 2010, Week 3
April 2010, Week 2
April 2010, Week 1
March 2010, Week 5
March 2010, Week 4
March 2010, Week 3
March 2010, Week 2
March 2010, Week 1
February 2010, Week 4
February 2010, Week 3
February 2010, Week 2
February 2010, Week 1
January 2010, Week 5
January 2010, Week 4
January 2010, Week 3
January 2010, Week 2
January 2010, Week 1
December 2009, Week 5
December 2009, Week 4
December 2009, Week 3
December 2009, Week 2
December 2009, Week 1
November 2009, Week 5
November 2009, Week 4
November 2009, Week 3
November 2009, Week 2
November 2009, Week 1
October 2009, Week 5
October 2009, Week 4
October 2009, Week 3
October 2009, Week 2
October 2009, Week 1
September 2009, Week 5
September 2009, Week 4
September 2009, Week 3
September 2009, Week 2
September 2009, Week 1
August 2009, Week 5
August 2009, Week 4
August 2009, Week 3
August 2009, Week 2
August 2009, Week 1
July 2009, Week 5
July 2009, Week 4
July 2009, Week 3
July 2009, Week 2
July 2009, Week 1
June 2009, Week 5
June 2009, Week 4
June 2009, Week 3
June 2009, Week 2
June 2009, Week 1
May 2009, Week 5
May 2009, Week 4
May 2009, Week 3
May 2009, Week 2
May 2009, Week 1
April 2009, Week 5
April 2009, Week 4
April 2009, Week 3
April 2009, Week 2
April 2009, Week 1
March 2009, Week 5
March 2009, Week 4
March 2009, Week 3
March 2009, Week 2
March 2009, Week 1
February 2009, Week 4
February 2009, Week 3
February 2009, Week 2
February 2009, Week 1
January 2009, Week 5
January 2009, Week 4
January 2009, Week 3
January 2009, Week 2
January 2009, Week 1
December 2008, Week 5
December 2008, Week 4
December 2008, Week 3
December 2008, Week 2
December 2008, Week 1
November 2008, Week 5
November 2008, Week 4
November 2008, Week 3
November 2008, Week 2
November 2008, Week 1
October 2008, Week 5
October 2008, Week 4
October 2008, Week 3
October 2008, Week 2
October 2008, Week 1
September 2008, Week 5
September 2008, Week 4
September 2008, Week 3
September 2008, Week 2
September 2008, Week 1
August 2008, Week 5
August 2008, Week 4
August 2008, Week 3
August 2008, Week 2
August 2008, Week 1
July 2008, Week 5
July 2008, Week 4
July 2008, Week 3
July 2008, Week 2
July 2008, Week 1
June 2008, Week 5
June 2008, Week 4
June 2008, Week 3
June 2008, Week 2
June 2008, Week 1
May 2008, Week 5
May 2008, Week 4
May 2008, Week 3
May 2008, Week 2
May 2008, Week 1
April 2008, Week 5
April 2008, Week 4
April 2008, Week 3
April 2008, Week 2
April 2008, Week 1
March 2008, Week 5
March 2008, Week 4
March 2008, Week 3
March 2008, Week 2
March 2008, Week 1
February 2008, Week 5
February 2008, Week 4
February 2008, Week 3
February 2008, Week 2
February 2008, Week 1
January 2008, Week 5
January 2008, Week 4
January 2008, Week 3
January 2008, Week 2
January 2008, Week 1
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager