*****  To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org  *****

You might find this study relevant:

Troster, Mehra, and Kippenberg. 2015. Structuring teams for success. OBHDP

Available free here:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597814000326




Sent from a faraway galaxy


> On Jul 7, 2016, at 13:26, Buchler, Norbou CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> *****  To join INSNA, visit http://www.insna.org  *****
> 
> Colleagues,
> 
> I'm looking to reference research articles that have tied network structure of small teams (n=6-8 people) to measured (scored) indices of performance. 
> 
> In low performing small teams, we find more communications and the team leader is central.
> In high performing teams, we find less communications overall and the team leader is in the periphery. 
> 
> This seems counter-intuitive, but is understandable in terms of the stages of team formation (Tuckman) and the establishment of normative and performance-focused work routines. 
> 
> If you have similar or contrary findings, please let me know and I will cite.
> 
> Thank you,
> Norbou
> 
> 
> Norbou Buchler, PhD
> Network Science Program
> Army Research Laboratory
> Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social
> network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send
> an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line
> UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.

_____________________________________________________________________
SOCNET is a service of INSNA, the professional association for social
network researchers (http://www.insna.org). To unsubscribe, send
an email message to [log in to unmask] containing the line
UNSUBSCRIBE SOCNET in the body of the message.