LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 15.5

Help for RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives

RECMGMT-L Archives


Next Message | Previous Message
Next in Topic | Previous in Topic
Next by Same Author | Previous by Same Author
Chronologically | Most Recent First
Proportional Font | Monospaced Font


Join or Leave RECMGMT-L
Reply | Post New Message
Search Archives

Subject: Re: Why Gov Needs Better Records Management
From: Christopher Ferry <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2017 09:57:54 -0400

text/plain (25 lines)


I'd add another caveat. Aside from the 2019 deadline applying only to
permanent records (as you mentioned), it also only applies only to
ELECTRONIC records. If a business process is still creating the record in
hardcopy (i.e. for a management signature or hardcopy comment letters from
the public) there is no requirement that the agency scan the hardcopy in
order to manage the record electronically. What it prevents is the printing
of electronic record to hardcopy for the purposes of records management.

This is a big deal for me as my records center has over 2 linear miles of
permanent records in hardcopy either on-site or at a Federal Records
Center. There's no way we can get all that backlog scanned in 2 1/2 years
(nor do we have an approved policy allowing for the hardcopy to be
destroyed after scanning, so there would be no reduction in warehousing
costs by doing this).

Christopher P. Ferry, CRM
Boston, MA
[log in to unmask]

List archives at
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

Back to: Top of Message | Previous Page | Main RECMGMT-L Page



CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager