|
|
|
|
FYI
I'm passing this info on that I received from a colleague.
Georgine Materniak
Director
University of Pittsburgh
Learning Skills Center
311 William Pitt Union
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
phone: (412)648-7920
fax: (412)648-7924
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
"Life is what happens while you are making other plans" John Lennon
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 11:19:09 -0500
From: Cheryl Lovell <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: NASPA Public Policy Alert
RELEASED January 22, 1998
!!!!!!!! NASPA PUBLIC POLICY ALERT !!!!!!!!
Attention NASPA members:
On Tuesday, January 14th an emergency meeting of higher education
governmental relations officers was held in Washington, DC to discuss
strategies to combat the recent news of President Clinton's proposal to
eliminate Perkins Loans. Every association is encouraging its members
to contact the White House comment line at (202) 456-1414 and the Office
of Public Liaison at the White House at (202) 456-2930. Therefore, we
ask our NASPA members to contact these offices IMMEDIATELY to express
your opposition to the proposed elimination of this important loan
program. We also recommend you contact your Congressional
Representatives and your campus and local newspapers to inform them of
this devastating proposal.
It appears Clinton's recommendation to eliminate the Perkins Loan is a
reversal of policy previously backed by the White House administration
and the US Department of Education.
We suggest you refer to the attached copy of the Federal Perkins Loan
Program Fact Sheet and a draft letter which would be appropriate for
sending to your elected officials. Please feel free to incorporate this
information into the letters and the calls you make. It is imperative
we express our concern to these officials and that they understand the
proposed elimination of the Perkins Loan Program will have a significant
impact to our students and campus communities.
Should you need additional information or desire to discuss this
important issue, please feel free to contact Gwen Dungy at
[log in to unmask] or contact Cheryl Lovell at [log in to unmask] The NASPA
Public Policy Advisory
Committee is committed to addressing issues of concern to our members
and to the millions of students you represent. However, we need each of
you to also play an active role in this process. Your telephone calls
and letters will make a tremendous difference. Please follow up TODAY.
This proposal can be reversed if the administration hears from concerned
citizens.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this important public policy
alert.
Cheryl D. Lovell, Chair
NASPA Public Policy Advisory Committee
Assistant Professor of Education and Coordinator of
Master's Program in Higher Education and Adult Studies
University of Denver
Attachments:
Federal Perkins Loan Program Fact Sheet
Sample Letter to Member of Congress
"What you can do" strategies list
**********
Cheryl D. Lovell, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Education and
Coordinator of Master's Program in
Higher Education and Adult Studies
College of Education
University of Denver
2450 S. Vine St., Room 229
Denver, CO 80208
303.871.2479 (voice)
303.871.4456 (fax)
[log in to unmask]
FEDERAL PERKINS LOAN PROGRAM FACT SHEET
The Federal Perkins Loan Program, formerly the National Defense Student
Loan Program was authorized by the National Education Act of 1958 and is
the oldest federally supported student aid program. The program offers
-low interest loans to students of higher education institutions through
campus revolving funds. New funds are added to the revolving fund by a
federal and institutional matching contribution.
The program fosters access to postsecondary education for low income
borrowers by providing low interest loans with favorable terms during a
period of declining grant availability.
Perkins loan borrowers are predominantly from lower income families.
Approximately 83 percent of the undergraduate dependent borrowers are
from families with incomes of $30,000 or below. Approximately 25%
percent of these borrowers are from families with incomes of $18,000 or
below.
Perkins loans have a 5 percent interest rate which begins to accrue
after a 9 month grace period when the borrower ceases to be a student.
The loans carry a number of cancellation provisions for public service
through VISTA, the Peace Corps and teacher shortage areas.
>From program inception over $15 billion in loans were made to 10 million
borrowers from the $6 billion federal dollars appropriated for the
program. In 1991-92, according to analysts at the Department of
Education, 654,244 students borrowed $867,800,439 in loans, with an
average amount of $1326.00 awarded per student. The cohort default rate
of 11 percent for the program is low when compared to other federal loan
programs and is extremely impressive when you consider the borrower
population. The success of the program should be attributed to the
central role of the education institution which originates the loan,
counsels the borrower through repayment. selects contractors for
servicing and collection; ultimately tailoring the program to best fit
the borrower's and institution's needs. Perkins is a risk-sharing
program with an institutional match to new federal contributions of 15
percent in the 1993-94 award year, increasing to 25 percent in
subsequent years.
for additional information on the Federal Perkins Loan Program contact.-
Ellin Nolan Judith Nemerovski Flink
COHEAO Consultant President, COHEAO
202-289-3910 312-996-2515
Prepared by the Coalition of Higher Education Assistance Organizations
(COHEAO)
WHY IS THE FEDERAL PERKINS LOAN PROGRAM NECESSARY?
WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO STUDENTS IF THEY CAN NO LONGER APPLY FOR FEDERAL
PERKINS LOANS?
Without access to a Federal Perkins Loan, many prospective students will
not be able to pursue a post-secondary education, particularly at a time
of escalating college costs. They will be forced to walk away from the
opportunity to improve their lives through the pursuit of their
academic, vocational and professional goals. Further, many currently
enrolled students receiving Federal Perkins Loans would not be able to
return to finish school, consequently dropping graduation rates.
About 83 percent of undergraduate Federal Perkins Loan borrowers are
from families with incomes at or below $30,000. Twenty-five percent of
these borrowers are from families with incomes of $18,000 or less.
Since its establishment in 1958, the Federal Perkins Loan Program has
made a postsecondary education possible for over 10 million of these
low-income borrowers. Since federal legislation places limits on
student borrowing, it would be virtually impossible for them to pay for
college without a Federal Perkins Loan. The alternative, in many
instances, is a PLUS (parent loan) or a private loan. These
alternatives are far more costly and, for certain students, not even an
option because of poor credit history, lack of credit-worthy co-signers,
or
COULDN'T THE FEDERAL PERKINS LOAN PROGRAM SURVIVE WITHOUT THE FEDERAL
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION (FCC)?
The Federal Perkins Loan Program is notable fbr its structure-students
who benefit from access to Perkins capital help keep the doors of
post-secondary education open for those who follow with every loan
repayment check they send to their institution. However, the FCC is
critical to insuring the longevity of the Federal Perkins Loan Program
for several reasons: it covers the default costs which even the best run
programs face; it meets the needs of increased numbers of eligible
students; and it covers costs that allows campuses to best meet
students' needs. The formula that determines campus-specific
appropriations is need-based, with consideration given to prior-year
collections. The true impact of the elimination of the FCC on the
Federal Perkins Loan Program is not just the federal government's
contribution, but also the potential loss of the one-third match
required by school participants. This match stretches federal dollars
and contributes to the fiscal health of the program.
WHAT ARE ARE ADVANTAGES OF FEDERAL PERKINS LOANS OVER OTHER LOANS?
The Federal Perkins Loan Program was established by Congress to promote
access to post-secondary education for low income borrowers by providing
low interest loans with favorable terms (current rate is 5%). Also,
deferments and forbearance can be granted to borrowers with documented
hardship. The loans carry a number of cancellation previsions such as
for public service through VISTA, the Peace Corps and for teaching in
teacher shortage areas. The Federal Direct Student Loan Program and the
Federal Family Education Loan Program do not offer students any of these
benefits. The fact that the Federal Perkins Loan Program is campus
-based is also an advantage for students. The local administration of
funds allows schools to tailor the program to best fit borrowers needs
and to insure efficient operation.
*** SAMPLE LETTER ***
Dear Member of Congress:
The Federal Perkins Loan Program, formerly the National Defense Student
Loan Program, was first authorized by the Congress in 1958 and is the
oldest federally supported student aid program. Over 2,700
participating higher education institutions offer low interest Perkins
loans to eligible students. These funds are supplemented each year by
repaid loans and federal funds that are matched by institutional dollars
(3 to 1). It is this critical capital contribution that we are asking
you to preserve.
Collectively, we represent thousands of students who attend higher
education institutions. As participants in the Federal Perkins Loan
Program, we know firsthand the importance of Perkins loans to low-income
students. The $158 million appropriated by the Congress in Fiscal Years
1994, 1995 and 1997 for the Perkins program leveraged $900 million each
year in loan capital for student borrowers. In addition, in FY 1998,
Congress increased allocations for the Federal Perkins Loan Program's
loan cancellation fired, an indication of increased support for loan
forgiveness for students who serve their communities.
The Federal Perkins Loan Program fosters access to postsecondary
education for low-income borrowers by providing low interest loans (five
percent annually) with favorable terms during a period of declining
grant availability. Approximately 83 percent of undergraduate Federal
Perkins borrowers are from families with incomes of $30,000 or below.
Approximately 25 percent of these borrowers are from families with
incomes of $18,000 or below.
Of particular importance are the loan cancellation provisions contained
in the Federal Perkins Loan Program, that apply to nurses, teachers and
other low-income service employees, who choose to work in disadvantaged
areas. The benefits to these areas would be lost with the elimination
of the Perkins program.
The Federal Perkins Loan Program has made over $13 billion in education
loans to eligible borrowers. This is a program that has stood the test
of time. It enjoys the support of all participating institutions and
its I I percent national cohort default rate indicates satisfaction
among its primary beneficiaries -- student borrowers.
At a time when access to education is increasingly important and costs
continue to escalate, we urge you to sustain critical federal support
for, campus-based student loans and the Federal Perkins Loan Program.
Thank you for your interest and attention to our request.
Sincerely,
*** WHAT YOU CAN DO ***
Call people you know in the administration (Department of Education,
Office of Management and Budget, White House)
Call a member of Congress, congressional staffer or committee staffer
you know.
Prepare a grassroots message for your members to use when they call the
administration.
Organize a letter-writing campaign to the administration.
Prepare op-eds for placement in local papers
The Message
Perkins loans have a unique role in student aid. The additional
resources they provide cannot be subsumed under other programs.
The additional $3,000 available through Perkins Loans gives campus
financial aid administrators the flexibility they need to meet the
special needs of low-income students, by providing less expensive loans
or supplementing federal loans for students whose borrowing needs are
greater than the limits set by the Stafford Loan Program.
Support all student aid programs, including Perkins Loans.
From: NASPA Office <[log in to unmask]>
***************************************************************************
This broadcast message was generated by the NASPA Office using listserve
software. If you have any questions or comments, please
DO NOT select reply in your email software, as this may result in your
message being posted back to ALL NASPA members. Questions or comments
should be directed to [log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
Archives |
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
January 2011
December 2010, Week 5
December 2010, Week 4
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 2
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 5
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
November 2010, Week 1
October 2010, Week 5
October 2010, Week 4
October 2010, Week 3
October 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 1
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 4
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5
August 2010, Week 4
August 2010, Week 3
August 2010, Week 2
August 2010, Week 1
July 2010, Week 5
July 2010, Week 4
July 2010, Week 3
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010, Week 1
June 2010, Week 5
June 2010, Week 4
June 2010, Week 3
June 2010, Week 2
June 2010, Week 1
May 2010, Week 4
May 2010, Week 3
May 2010, Week 2
May 2010, Week 1
April 2010, Week 5
April 2010, Week 4
April 2010, Week 3
April 2010, Week 2
April 2010, Week 1
March 2010, Week 5
March 2010, Week 4
March 2010, Week 3
March 2010, Week 2
March 2010, Week 1
February 2010, Week 4
February 2010, Week 3
February 2010, Week 2
February 2010, Week 1
January 2010, Week 5
January 2010, Week 4
January 2010, Week 3
January 2010, Week 2
January 2010, Week 1
December 2009, Week 5
December 2009, Week 4
December 2009, Week 3
December 2009, Week 2
December 2009, Week 1
November 2009, Week 5
November 2009, Week 4
November 2009, Week 3
November 2009, Week 2
November 2009, Week 1
October 2009, Week 5
October 2009, Week 4
October 2009, Week 3
October 2009, Week 2
October 2009, Week 1
September 2009, Week 5
September 2009, Week 4
September 2009, Week 3
September 2009, Week 2
September 2009, Week 1
August 2009, Week 5
August 2009, Week 4
August 2009, Week 3
August 2009, Week 2
August 2009, Week 1
July 2009, Week 5
July 2009, Week 4
July 2009, Week 3
July 2009, Week 2
July 2009, Week 1
June 2009, Week 5
June 2009, Week 4
June 2009, Week 3
June 2009, Week 2
June 2009, Week 1
May 2009, Week 5
May 2009, Week 4
May 2009, Week 3
May 2009, Week 2
May 2009, Week 1
April 2009, Week 5
April 2009, Week 4
April 2009, Week 3
April 2009, Week 2
April 2009, Week 1
March 2009, Week 5
March 2009, Week 4
March 2009, Week 3
March 2009, Week 2
March 2009, Week 1
February 2009, Week 4
February 2009, Week 3
February 2009, Week 2
February 2009, Week 1
January 2009, Week 5
January 2009, Week 4
January 2009, Week 3
January 2009, Week 2
January 2009, Week 1
December 2008, Week 5
December 2008, Week 4
December 2008, Week 3
December 2008, Week 2
December 2008, Week 1
November 2008, Week 5
November 2008, Week 4
November 2008, Week 3
November 2008, Week 2
November 2008, Week 1
October 2008, Week 5
October 2008, Week 4
October 2008, Week 3
October 2008, Week 2
October 2008, Week 1
September 2008, Week 5
September 2008, Week 4
September 2008, Week 3
September 2008, Week 2
September 2008, Week 1
August 2008, Week 5
August 2008, Week 4
August 2008, Week 3
August 2008, Week 2
August 2008, Week 1
July 2008, Week 5
July 2008, Week 4
July 2008, Week 3
July 2008, Week 2
July 2008, Week 1
June 2008, Week 5
June 2008, Week 4
June 2008, Week 3
June 2008, Week 2
June 2008, Week 1
May 2008, Week 5
May 2008, Week 4
May 2008, Week 3
May 2008, Week 2
May 2008, Week 1
April 2008, Week 5
April 2008, Week 4
April 2008, Week 3
April 2008, Week 2
April 2008, Week 1
March 2008, Week 5
March 2008, Week 4
March 2008, Week 3
March 2008, Week 2
March 2008, Week 1
February 2008, Week 5
February 2008, Week 4
February 2008, Week 3
February 2008, Week 2
February 2008, Week 1
January 2008, Week 5
January 2008, Week 4
January 2008, Week 3
January 2008, Week 2
January 2008, Week 1
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
|
|
