LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CMPLAW-L Archives


CMPLAW-L Archives

CMPLAW-L Archives


CMPLAW-L@LISTS.UFL.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CMPLAW-L Home

CMPLAW-L Home

CMPLAW-L  October 1999

CMPLAW-L October 1999

Subject:

Re: Domain Name Questions

From:

"John P. McNeill" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Internet and Computer Law Association <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 11 Oct 1999 20:17:41 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (51 lines)

For an excellent compilation of domain name cases see the following link:

        http://www.perkinscoie.com/resource/ecomm/netcase/Cases-08.htm


At 12:59 PM 10/11/1999 -0400, you wrote:
>Doesn't  this encourage (loathed) CyberSquatting on large 'territories' of
>domain names styled to provoke?  For the settlement value, "before filing"
>and without plans to do so?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carl Oppedahl <[log in to unmask]>
>To: Internet and Computer Law Association <[log in to unmask]>
>Cc: L Misek-Falkoff <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: Monday, October 11, 1999 12:44 PM
>Subject: Re: Domain Name Questions
>
>
>>At 10:23 AM 10/11/99 , L Misek-Falkoff <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>>Thanks so much for this early and quite educational response, which will
>be
>>>read in detail.  And also for the Law Journal Link.
>>>
>>>Wonder if there have been any cases where a domain name dispute has been
>>>judged frivolous, with punitive sanctions or similar penalty applied?
>>>
>>>Too soon?
>>
>>There have been many recent decisions in favor of domain name owners who
>>were targets of reverse domain name hijacking, among them the cds.com and
>>dci.com cases (written up at http://www.patents.com/pubs/njl1.htm ), the
>>prince.com case in England, and the recent clue.com decision in
>>Massachusetts (now on appeal).
>>
>>But none of which am aware in which the court has seen fit to sanction the
>>reverse domain name hijacker for bringing a frivolous claim.
>>
>>The problem, of course, is that historically most RDN hijackers have used
>>NSI's policy, so that NSI does the dirty work for them, and imposes no
>>penalty for bringing a frivolous claim.
>>
>>The new ICANN policy also imposes no penalty for bringing a frivolous
>claim.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

February 2005
August 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
November 2001
October 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
April 2001
March 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
June 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.UFL.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager