Print

Print


Wow!
What a suggestion.

Archival
Other

How much more simple does a person from what university did you say, need?

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Larry Medina [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:   Friday, March 15, 2002 4:07 PM
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        Re: New Topic!  Records Classifications and
Descriptions/Definiti ons

>Larry is this what you mean?
>
>Stuff
>Miscellaneous
>Ephemera
>More stuff
>Junk
>New stuff
>Archival


Actually, no.  But I'm sure this is about how your program in Idaho is
designed... seeing as you are the ultimate authority on the retention of
records for the institution (and yes, I DO feel safer with you being
Institutionalized, ESPECIALLY today).

It would seem based on this schema that you ONLY have Archival as a
legitimate classification?

Larry  (if you'd like a second chance, I'm feeling gracious today)

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance