You have really begun to make me think about what are the significant “attributes of a relationship/tie”.
I am thinking of a list that begins with:
I am sure there are others, and I will keep thinking. Do you have any others to add to the list?
Dee Kramer, MES, MSc, PhD.
Institute for Work & Health
481 University Ave., Suite 800
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2E9
Tel: (416)927-2027, ext. 2146
Email: [log in to unmask]
From: Graeme Larsen [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:49 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: evaluating networks qualitatively
Catherine and other SOCNET colleagues,
You ask what kind of attributes i am interested in. Well i am unsure. Whiltst i accept 'how' communicaiton occurs in an informal network can be mapped and positions quantified by SNA, the only explaination for 'why' they occur this way is based around the SNA quantitative data/paradigm. Regarding innovations, there are many attributes related to the innovation, cost, advantages, drivers behind it etc etc (Rogers early stuff) and the type of social system it is diffused into, interest rates, political system, level of competition etc etc. This is before we start to consider elements concerning the actors, education, value systems, individual drivers etc. If occurs to me that there are all these complementary 'softer' issues that actually contribute to the network which i want to include.
I hope you can make sense of this.
University of Reading